» Articles » PMID: 33923312

Long-Term Results of a Standard Algorithm for Intravenous Port Implantation

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2021 Apr 30
PMID 33923312
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intravenous ports serve as vascular access and are indispensable in cancer treatment. Most studies are not based on a systematic and standardized approach. Hence, the aim of this study was to demonstrate long-term results of port implantation following a standard algorithm. A total of 2950 patients who underwent intravenous port implantation between March 2012 and December 2018 were included. Data of patients managed following a standard algorithm were analyzed for safety and long-term outcomes. The cephalic vein was the predominant choice of entry vessel. In female patients, wire assistance without use of puncture sheath was less likely and echo-guided puncture via internal jugular vein (IJV) with use of puncture sheath was more likely to be performed, compared to male patients ( < 0.0001). The procedure-related complication rate was 0.07%, and no pneumothorax, hematoma, catheter kinking, catheter fracture, or pocket erosion was reported. Catheter implantations by echo-guided puncture via IJV notably declined from 4.67% to 0.99% ( = 0.027). Mean operative time gradually declined from 37.88 min in 2012 to 23.20 min in 2018. The proposed standard algorithm for port implantation reduced the need for IJV echo-guided approach and eliminated procedure-related catastrophic complications. In addition, it shortened operative time and demonstrated good functional results.

Citing Articles

Cephalic Vein Cut Down for Total Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution Series.

Velez A EJVES Vasc Forum. 2023; 59:2-7.

PMID: 37213486 PMC: 10196808. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2023.04.002.


Central venous catheterization: the cephalic vein access.

Jiang S, Shen Y, Zhao X Crit Care. 2022; 26(1):169.

PMID: 35676729 PMC: 9178892. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-04031-y.

References
1.
Fu J, Wu C, Ko P, Wu C, Kao T, Yu S . Analysis of chest X-ray plain film images of intravenous ports inserted via the superior vena cava. Surg Today. 2014; 44(8):1513-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-0893-5. View

2.
Wu C, Ko P, Wu C, Liu Y, Kao T, Yu S . A single-center study of vascular access sites for intravenous ports. Surg Today. 2013; 44(4):723-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-013-0610-9. View

3.
Sun X, Bai X, Shen J, Yu Z, Zhuang Z, Jin Y . Comparison between ultrasound-guided TIVAD via the right innominate vein and the right internal jugular vein approach. BMC Surg. 2019; 19(1):189. PMC: 6907195. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0651-0. View

4.
Spencer T, Mahoney K . Reducing catheter-related thrombosis using a risk reduction tool centered on catheter to vessel ratio. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017; 44(4):427-434. DOI: 10.1007/s11239-017-1569-y. View

5.
Wu C, Cheng C, Fu J, Chu Y, Wu C, Chiu C . Recommended irrigation volume for an intravenous port: Ex vivo simulation study. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0201785. PMC: 6091923. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201785. View