» Articles » PMID: 33922016

Overcoming the Challenges of High Quality RNA Extraction from Core Needle Biopsy

Overview
Journal Biomolecules
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Apr 30
PMID 33922016
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of gene expression profiling (GEP) in cancer management is rising, as GEP can be used for disease classification and diagnosis, tailoring treatment to underlying genetic determinants of pharmacological response, monitoring of therapy response, and prognosis. However, the reliability of GEP heavily depends on the input of RNA in sufficient quantity and quality. This highlights the need for standard procedures to ensure best practices for RNA extraction from often small tumor biopsies with variable tissue handling. We optimized an RNA extraction protocol from fresh-frozen (FF) core needle biopsies (CNB) from breast cancer patients and from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue when FF CNB did not yield sufficient RNA. Methods to avoid ribonucleases andto homogenize or to deparaffinize tissues and the impact of tissue composition on RNA extraction were studied. Additionally, RNA's compatibility with the nanoString nCounter technology was studied. This technology platform enables GEP using small RNA fragments. After optimization of the protocol, RNA of high quality and sufficient quantity was obtained from FF CNB in 92% of samples. For the remaining 8% of cases, FFPE material prepared by the pathology department was used for RNA extraction. Both resulting RNA end products are compatible with the nanoString nCounter technology.

Citing Articles

Proof of Concept Study: Comparison of Semi-Automated RNA Isolation Methods from Archived Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues with Clinical Routine RNA Isolation Methods.

Petersen P, James J, Riis L, Hogdall C, Hogdall E Methods Protoc. 2024; 7(6).

PMID: 39728621 PMC: 11678837. DOI: 10.3390/mps7060101.


Evaluation of Needles in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition of Pancreatic Cancer for Genetic Yield and Quality.

Tiong J, Nguyen P, Sritharan M, Lundy J, Shen H, Kumar B Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e68431.

PMID: 39360054 PMC: 11445693. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68431.


Targeted Radionuclide Therapy with Low and High-Dose Lutetium-177-Labeled Single Domain Antibodies Induces Distinct Immune Signatures in a Mouse Melanoma Model.

Ertveldt T, De Beck L, De Ridder K, Locy H, de Mey W, Goyvaerts C Mol Cancer Ther. 2022; 21(7):1136-1148.

PMID: 35499391 PMC: 9377759. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-21-0791.


Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer: A Proposal for Combining Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression Analysis to Refine Scoring.

Locy H, Verhulst S, Cools W, Waelput W, Brock S, Cras L Front Immunol. 2022; 13:794175.

PMID: 35222378 PMC: 8876933. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.794175.

References
1.
Lu W, Li N, Liao F . Identification of Key Genes and Pathways in Pancreatic Cancer Gene Expression Profile by Integrative Analysis. Genes (Basel). 2019; 10(8). PMC: 6722756. DOI: 10.3390/genes10080612. View

2.
Zhu T, Zheng J, Hu S, Zhang W, Zhou H, Li X . Construction and validation of an immunity-related prognostic signature for breast cancer. Aging (Albany NY). 2020; 12(21):21597-21612. PMC: 7695418. DOI: 10.18632/aging.103952. View

3.
Koroknai V, Patel V, Szasz I, Adany R, Balazs M . Gene Expression Signature of BRAF Inhibitor Resistant Melanoma Spheroids. Pathol Oncol Res. 2020; 26(4):2557-2566. PMC: 7471197. DOI: 10.1007/s12253-020-00837-9. View

4.
Bhattacharya A, Hamilton A, Furberg H, Pietzak E, Purdue M, Troester M . An approach for normalization and quality control for NanoString RNA expression data. Brief Bioinform. 2020; 22(3). PMC: 8138885. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa163. View

5.
Van Lint S, Renmans D, Broos K, Goethals L, Maenhout S, Benteyn D . Intratumoral Delivery of TriMix mRNA Results in T-cell Activation by Cross-Presenting Dendritic Cells. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015; 4(2):146-56. DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0163. View