A Systematic Review of Commercial Smart Gloves: Current Status and Applications

Overview

Journal Sensors (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biotechnology

Date 2021 Apr 30

PMID 33920101

Citations 16

Authors

Manuel Caeiro-Rodriguez

Ivan Otero-Gonzalez

Fernando A Mikic-Fonte

Martin Llamas-Nistal

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Smart gloves have been under development during the last 40 years to support human-computer interaction based on hand and finger movement. Despite the many devoted efforts and the multiple advances in related areas, these devices have not become mainstream yet. Nevertheless, during recent years, new devices with improved features have appeared, being used for research purposes too. This paper provides a review of current commercial smart gloves focusing on three main capabilities: (i) hand and finger pose estimation and motion tracking, (ii) kinesthetic feedback, and (iii) tactile feedback. For the first capability, a detailed reference model of the hand and finger basic movements (known as degrees of freedom) is proposed. Based on the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews for the period 2015-2021, 24 commercial smart gloves have been identified, while many others have been discarded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria: currently active commercial and fully portable smart gloves providing some of the three main capabilities for the whole hand. The paper reviews the technologies involved, main applications and it discusses about the current state of development. Reference models to support end users and researchers comparing and selecting the most appropriate devices are identified as a key need.

Citing Articles

The Design and Validation of an Open-Palm Data Glove for Precision Finger and Wrist Tracking.

Hosie O, Isaksson M, McCormick J, Tirosh O, Hensman C Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(2).

PMID: 39860737 PMC: 11769055. DOI: 10.3390/s25020367.

Systematic Evaluation of IMU Sensors for Application in Smart Glove System for Remote Monitoring of Hand Differences.

Harrison A, Jester A, Mouli S, Fratini A, Jabran A Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(1.

PMID: 39796792 PMC: 11722738. DOI: 10.3390/s25010002.

Static and Dynamic Hand Gestures: A Review of Techniques of Virtual Reality Manipulation.

Herbert O, Perez-Granados D, Ruiz M, Cadena Martinez R, Gutierrez C, Antunano M Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(12).

PMID: 38931542 PMC: 11207792. DOI: 10.3390/s24123760.

Teleoperated Grasping Using Data Gloves Based on Fuzzy Logic Controller.

Lu C, Jin L, Liu Y, Wang J, Li W Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(2).

PMID: 38392162 PMC: 10886496. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9020116.

Hand Gesture Interface for Robot Path Definition in Collaborative Applications: Implementation and Comparative Study.

Vysocky A, Postulka T, Chlebek J, Kot T, Maslowski J, Grushko S Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(9).

PMID: 37177421 PMC: 10180605. DOI: 10.3390/s23094219.

References

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

Galvan-Ruiz J, Travieso-Gonzalez C, Tejera-Fettmilch A, Pinan-Roescher A, Esteban-Hernandez L, Dominguez-Quintana L . Perspective and Evolution of Gesture Recognition for Sign Language: A Review. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(12). PMC: 7349703. DOI: 10.3390/s20123571. View

Jaskiewicz F, Kowalewski D, Starosta K, Cierniak M, Timler D . Chest compressions quality during sudden cardiac arrest scenario performed in virtual reality: A crossover study in a training environment. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(48):e23374. PMC: 7710239. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023374. View

Parger M, Tang C, Xu Y, Twigg C, Tao L, Li Y . UNOC: Understanding Occlusion for Embodied Presence in Virtual Reality. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2021; 28(12):4240-4251. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3085407. View

Lee H, Lim J, Jeon B, Song C . Non-immersive Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Applied to a Task-oriented Approach for Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2020; 38(2):165-172. DOI: 10.3233/RNN-190975. View

Brand J, Piccirelli M, Hepp-Reymond M, Eng K, Michels L . Brain Activation During Visually Guided Finger Movements. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:309. PMC: 7456884. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00309. View

Blanke O, Metzinger T . Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008; 13(1):7-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.003. View

Arkenbout E, de Winter J, Breedveld P . Robust Hand Motion Tracking through Data Fusion of 5DT Data Glove and Nimble VR Kinect Camera Measurements. Sensors (Basel). 2015; 15(12):31644-71. PMC: 4721788. DOI: 10.3390/s151229868. View

Kim M, Jeon C, Kim J . A Study on Immersion and Presence of a Portable Hand Haptic System for Immersive Virtual Reality. Sensors (Basel). 2017; 17(5). PMC: 5470817. DOI: 10.3390/s17051141. View

10.

Gao Q, Jiang S, Shull P . Simultaneous Hand Gesture Classification and Finger Angle Estimation via a Novel Dual-Output Deep Learning Model. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(10). PMC: 7287638. DOI: 10.3390/s20102972. View

11.

Jung H, Kim H, Jeong J, Jeon B, Taekeong Ryu , Kim Y . Feasibility of using the RAPAEL Smart Glove in upper limb physical therapy for patients after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017; 2017:3856-3859. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037698. View

12.

Bohil C, Alicea B, Biocca F . Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011; 12(12):752-62. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3122. View

13.

Johnson-Glenberg M . Immersive VR and Education: Embodied Design Principles That Include Gesture and Hand Controls. Front Robot AI. 2021; 5:81. PMC: 7805662. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00081. View

14.

Kang M, Yun S, Lee S, Oh B, Lee H, Lee S . Effects of Upper-Extremity Rehabilitation Using Smart Glove in Patients With Subacute Stroke: Results of a Prematurely Terminated Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Neurol. 2020; 11:580393. PMC: 7680863. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.580393. View

15.

Ahmed M, Zaidan B, Zaidan A, Salih M, Lakulu M . A Review on Systems-Based Sensory Gloves for Sign Language Recognition State of the Art between 2007 and 2017. Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18(7). PMC: 6069389. DOI: 10.3390/s18072208. View

16.

Chen W, Yu C, Tu C, Lyu Z, Tang J, Ou S . A Survey on Hand Pose Estimation with Wearable Sensors and Computer-Vision-Based Methods. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(4). PMC: 7071082. DOI: 10.3390/s20041074. View

17.

Pacchierotti C, Sinclair S, Solazzi M, Frisoli A, Hayward V, Prattichizzo D . Wearable Haptic Systems for the Fingertip and the Hand: Taxonomy, Review, and Perspectives. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2017; 10(4):580-600. DOI: 10.1109/TOH.2017.2689006. View

18.

Wang D, Song M, Naqash A, Zheng Y, Xu W, Zhang Y . Toward Whole-Hand Kinesthetic Feedback: A Survey of Force Feedback Gloves. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2018; 12(2):189-204. DOI: 10.1109/TOH.2018.2879812. View