» Articles » PMID: 33919772

A Retrospective Case Study into the Effect of Hoof Lesions on the Lying Behaviour of Holstein-Friesian in a Loose-Housed System

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2021 Apr 30
PMID 33919772
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The association between hoof lesions and lying behaviour was assessed on a Holstein-Friesian dairy farm in England. Twenty-nine cows were included in the study. Cows with claw horn disruption lesions (CHDL, = 8), soft tissue lesions (STL, = 6), and no lesions (NL, = 15) were assessed. Data were collected on parity, days in milk (DIM), and mobility scores. Cows were trimmed and treated, and lesions were recorded by a professional foot trimmer. Lying behaviour was assessed before and after claw trimming. The milking herd ( = 96) prevalence of lameness was 32.3%. Mobility was scored using the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) Mobility Scoring system. Mobility scores were significantly different across lesions groups ( = 0.022). CHDL cows had a mean mobility score of 2.0 ± 0.9 (mean ± SD), STL were scored 1.2 ± 1.3, and NL cows were 0.9 ± 0.7. CHDL were associated with longer lying times (15.00 ± 1.04 h/d; = 0.0006) and shorter standing times (9.68 ± 2.38 h/d; = 0.0351) compared with NL lying times (11.77 ± 1.67 h/d) and standing times (12.21 ± 1.67 h/d). STL cows spent significantly less time lying (11.30 ± 2.44; = 0.0013) than CHDL but not NL cows. No significant differences were found with any of the other lying behaviours. After trimming, CHDL cows spent significantly less time lying down than before trimming (13.66 ± 0.98; = 0.0125). Cows with NL spent significantly more time lying down (12.57 ± 1.90; = 0.0398) and had a shorter minimum lying bout duration (0.17 ± 0.09; = 0.0236) after trimming. In conclusion, lying behaviour in dairy cattle was impacted by type of hoof lesions and hoof trimming.

Citing Articles

A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of lameness and digital dermatitis in dairy cattle herds in Egypt.

Salem S, Mesalam A, Monir A BMC Vet Res. 2023; 19(1):68.

PMID: 37147700 PMC: 10163755. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-023-03620-5.

References
1.
Walker S, Smith R, Routly J, Jones D, Morris M, Dobson H . Lameness, activity time-budgets, and estrus expression in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91(12):4552-9. PMC: 2729911. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1048. View

2.
Flower F, Weary D . Effect of hoof pathologies on subjective assessments of dairy cow gait. J Dairy Sci. 2005; 89(1):139-46. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72077-X. View

3.
Overton M, Sischo W, Temple G, Moore D . Using time-lapse video photography to assess dairy cattle lying behavior in a free-stall barn. J Dairy Sci. 2002; 85(9):2407-13. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74323-3. View

4.
Gomez A, Cook N . Time budgets of lactating dairy cattle in commercial freestall herds. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93(12):5772-81. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3436. View

5.
Cook N, Bennett T, Nordlund K . Effect of free stall surface on daily activity patterns in dairy cows with relevance to lameness prevalence. J Dairy Sci. 2004; 87(9):2912-22. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73422-0. View