» Articles » PMID: 33918651

Social Vulnerability Indicators for Flooding in Aotearoa New Zealand

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Apr 30
PMID 33918651
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Social vulnerability indicators are a valuable tool for understanding which population groups are more vulnerable to experiencing negative impacts from disasters, and where these groups live, to inform disaster risk management activities. While many approaches have been used to measure social vulnerability to natural hazards, there is no single method or universally agreed approach. This paper proposes a novel approach to developing social vulnerability indicators, using the example of flooding in Aotearoa New Zealand. A conceptual framework was developed to guide selection of the social vulnerability indicators, based on previous frameworks (including the MOVE framework), consideration of climate change, and a holistic view of health and wellbeing. Using this framework, ten dimensions relating to social vulnerability were identified: exposure; children; older adults; health and disability status; money to cope with crises/losses; social connectedness; knowledge, skills and awareness of natural hazards; safe, secure and healthy housing; food and water to cope with shortage; and decision making and participation. For each dimension, key indicators were identified and implemented, mostly using national Census population data. After development, the indicators were assessed by end users using a case study of Porirua City, New Zealand, then implemented for the whole of New Zealand. These indicators will provide useful data about social vulnerability to floods in New Zealand, and these methods could potentially be adapted for other jurisdictions and other natural hazards, including those relating to climate change.

Citing Articles

The need to reconfigure consistency and variability to best manage changing flood risks in Aotearoa-New Zealand.

Serrao-Neumann S, White I, Dean S, Paulik R, Sleight B, Stori F J R Soc N Z. 2024; 54(4):473-490.

PMID: 39440122 PMC: 11459775. DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2023.2211777.


A bibliometric and systematic review of the Methods for the Improvement of Vulnerability Assessment in Europe framework: A guide for the development of further multi-hazard holistic framework.

Jamshed A, Rana I, Birkmann J, McMillan J, Kienberger S Jamba. 2024; 15(1):1486.

PMID: 38223542 PMC: 10784246. DOI: 10.4102/jamba.v15i1.1486.


Vulnerability assessment of debris flow in the central Peruvian rainforest - An intercultural approach.

Izquierdo-Horna L, Sanchez-Castro A, Duran J Heliyon. 2023; 9(10):e20788.

PMID: 37876464 PMC: 10590786. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20788.


Social vulnerability, social-ecological resilience and coastal governance.

Jozaei J, Chuang W, Allen C, Garmestani A Glob Sustain. 2023; 5:1-9.

PMID: 37383242 PMC: 10304588. DOI: 10.1017/sus.2022.10.

References
1.
Smith W, Davies-Colley C, Mackay A, Bankoff G . Social impact of the 2004 Manawatu floods and the 'hollowing out' of rural New Zealand. Disasters. 2011; 35(3):540-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01228.x. View

2.
Alderman K, Turner L, Tong S . Floods and human health: a systematic review. Environ Int. 2012; 47:37-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.003. View

3.
Phibbs S, Kenney C, Severinsen C, Mitchell J, Hughes R . Synergising Public Health Concepts with the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: A Conceptual Glossary. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13(12). PMC: 5201382. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13121241. View

4.
Du W, FitzGerald G, Clark M, Hou X . Health impacts of floods. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010; 25(3):265-72. DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x00008141. View

5.
Blake D, Lyons A . Opioid Substitution Treatment Planning in a Disaster Context: Perspectives from Emergency Management and Health Professionals in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13(11). PMC: 5129332. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13111122. View