Canopy Size and Light Use Efficiency Explain Growth Differences Between Lettuce and Mizuna in Vertical Farms
Overview
Affiliations
Vertical farming is increasingly popular due to high yields obtained from a small land area. However, the energy cost associated with lighting of vertical farms is high. To reduce this cost, more energy efficient (biomass/energy use) crops are required. To understand how efficiently crops use light energy to produce biomass, we determined the morphological and physiological differences between mizuna ( var. ) and lettuce ( 'Green Salad Bowl'). To do so, we measured the projected canopy size (PCS, a morphological measure) of the plants throughout the growing cycle to determine the total amount of incident light the plants received. Total incident light was used together with the final dry weight to calculate the light use efficiency (LUE, g of dry weight/mol of incident light), a physiological measure. Plants were grown under six photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFD), from 50 to 425 µmol m s, for 16 h d. Mizuna and lettuce were harvested 27 and 28 days after seeding, respectively. Mizuna had greater dry weight than lettuce ( < 0.0001), especially at higher PPFDs (PPFD ≥ 125 µmol m s), partly because of differences in the projected canopy size (PCS). Mizuna had greater PCS than lettuce at PPFDs ≥ 125 µmol m s and therefore, the total incident light over the growing period was also greater. Mizuna also had a higher LUE than lettuce at all six PPFDs. This difference in LUE was associated with higher chlorophyll content index and higher quantum yield of photosystem II in mizuna. The combined effects of these two factors resulted in higher photosynthetic rates in mizuna than in lettuce ( = 0.01). In conclusion, the faster growth of mizuna is the result of both a larger PCS and higher LUE compared to lettuce. Understanding the basic determinants of crop growth is important when screening for rapidly growing crops and increasing the efficiency of vertical farms.
Nam S, van Iersel M, Ferrarezi R Physiol Plant. 2025; 177(1):e70073.
PMID: 39835492 PMC: 11748110. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.70073.
Mayorga-Gomez A, van Iersel M, Ferrarezi R Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1467443.
PMID: 39719936 PMC: 11667103. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1467443.
Jayalath T, van Iersel M, Ferrarezi R Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(5).
PMID: 38475498 PMC: 10934181. DOI: 10.3390/plants13050652.
Hammock H, Kopsell D, Sams C Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1174823.
PMID: 38023892 PMC: 10644351. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1174823.
Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density Effects on in Controlled-Environment Agriculture.
Kudirka G, Virsile A, Lauzike K, Sutuliene R, Samuoliene G Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(20).
PMID: 37896086 PMC: 10609831. DOI: 10.3390/plants12203622.