» Articles » PMID: 33917232

In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit After a Return Visit to the Emergency Department

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 Apr 30
PMID 33917232
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) admission following a short-term emergency department (ED) revisit has been considered a particularly undesirable outcome among return-visit patients, although their in-hospital prognosis has not been discussed. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes between adult patients admitted to the ICU after unscheduled ED revisits and those admitted during index ED visits.

Method: This retrospective study was conducted at two tertiary medical centers in Taiwan from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. All adult non-trauma patients admitted to the ICU directly via the ED during the study period were included and divided into two comparison groups: patients admitted to the ICU during index ED visits and those admitted to the ICU during return ED visits. The outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, mechanical ventilation (MV) support, profound shock, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and total medical cost.

Results: Altogether, 12,075 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 64.6 (15.7) years were included. Among these, 5.3% were admitted to the ICU following a return ED visit within 14 days and 3.1% were admitted following a return ED visit within 7 days. After adjusting for confounding factors for multivariate regression analysis, ICU admission following an ED revisit within 14 days was not associated with an increased mortality rate (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89 to 1.32), MV support (aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.26), profound shock (aOR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.18), prolonged HLOS (difference: 0.04 days, 95% CI: -1.02 to 1.09), and increased total medical cost (difference: USD 361, 95% CI: -303 to 1025). Similar results were observed after the regression analysis in patients that had a 7-day return visit.

Conclusion: ICU admission following a return ED visit was not associated with major in-hospital outcomes including mortality, MV support, shock, increased HLOS, or medical cost. Although ICU admissions following ED revisits are considered serious adverse events, they may not indicate poor prognosis in ED practice.

Citing Articles

Prediction of high-risk emergency department revisits from a machine-learning algorithm: a proof-of-concept study.

Sung C, Ho J, Fan C, Chen C, Chen C, Lin S BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024; 31(1).

PMID: 38649237 PMC: 11043771. DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100859.

References
1.
Naved S, Siddiqui S, Khan F . APACHE-II score correlation with mortality and length of stay in an intensive care unit. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011; 21(1):4-8. DOI: 01.2011/JCPSP.0408. View

2.
Brennan T, Leape L, Laird N, Hebert L, Localio A, Lawthers A . Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324(6):370-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240604. View

3.
Hu K, Lu Y, Lin H, Guo H, Foo N . Unscheduled return visits with and without admission post emergency department discharge. J Emerg Med. 2012; 43(6):1110-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.01.062. View

4.
Jimenez-Puente A, Del Rio-Mata J, Arjona-Huertas J, Mora-Ordonez B, Martinez-Reina A, Martinez Del Campo M . Which unscheduled return visits indicate a quality-of-care issue?. Emerg Med J. 2016; 34(3):145-150. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205603. View

5.
Fan J, Kao W, Yen D, Wang L, Huang C, Lee C . Risk factors and prognostic predictors of unexpected intensive care unit admission within 3 days after ED discharge. Am J Emerg Med. 2007; 25(9):1009-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.03.005. View