» Articles » PMID: 33914197

Comparing Two Treatment Approaches for Patients with Type 1 Diabetes During Aerobic Exercise: a Randomised, Crossover Study

Overview
Journal Sports Med Open
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Apr 29
PMID 33914197
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In a randomised, counterbalanced, crossover design, eight men with type 1 diabetes (T1D; mean ± SD age, 27.6 ± 11.4 years) reduced insulin (INS) by 50% of their normal dose or consumed carbohydrates equivalent to 1 g of carbohydrate per kilogramme of their body weight without the usual insulin bolus (CARBS) over two sessions, held a week apart. Each session included standardised meals, a 45-min treadmill walk at 7.24 km h and a 6-min walk test (6MWT). Rate of perceived exertion (RPE), blood glucose, ketone and lactate measures were taken before, during and immediately after the aerobic exercise. The distance covered in metres and the predicted VO max (mL kg min) were also calculated for the 6MWT.

Results: Participants completing the INS intervention spent more time in normoglycaemia (242 ± 135 min vs 88 ± 132 min; P < 0.01) and less time in hyperglycaemia (41 ± 95 min vs 154 ± 125 min; P = 0.01) as compared to the CARBS intervention. Mild hypoglycaemia occurred in two participants during INS and no participants during CARBS. Furthermore, there was no significant difference for blood lactate, ketone, RPE, distance covered and predicted VO max between interventions.

Conclusion: Based on this pilot study, INS intervention appears to be the best approach for maintaining blood glucose levels in those with T1D during aerobic exercise, though this does need evaluation in other groups, including women, children and those with suboptimal glycaemic control.

Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12619001397101p . Registered 09 September 2019.

References
1.
Wrobel M, Rokicka D, Czuba M, Golas A, Pyka L, Greif M . Aerobic as well as resistance exercises are good for patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018; 144:93-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.08.008. View

2.
Floyd B, Chandra P, Hall S, Phillips C, Alema-Mensah E, Strayhorn G . Comparative analysis of the efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012; 6(5):1094-102. PMC: 3570843. DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600513. View

3.
Burr J, Bredin S, Faktor M, Warburton D . The 6-minute walk test as a predictor of objectively measured aerobic fitness in healthy working-aged adults. Phys Sportsmed. 2011; 39(2):133-9. DOI: 10.3810/psm.2011.05.1904. View

4.
Moser O, Mueller A, Eckstein M, Ziko H, Aberer F, Treiber G . Improved glycaemic variability and basal insulin dose reduction during a running competition in recreationally active adults with type 1 diabetes-A single-centre, prospective, controlled observational study. PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0239091. PMC: 7485886. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239091. View

5.
Riddell M, Milliken J . Preventing exercise-induced hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes using real-time continuous glucose monitoring and a new carbohydrate intake algorithm: an observational field study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011; 13(8):819-25. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2011.0052. View