» Articles » PMID: 33912361

Lateral Sagittal Versus Costoclavicular Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparison of Block Dynamics Through A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2021 Apr 29
PMID 33912361
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction In this study, our objective was to compare the lateral sagittal infraclavicular block (LS-ICB) with the costoclavicular infraclavicular block (CC-ICB) for ultrasound (US)-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block in terms of block dynamics as well as patient and surgeon satisfaction levels. Methods A total of 100 patients, falling under the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I-III categories, who were aged 18-65 years and scheduled for elective forearm and hand surgery were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly allocated to receive a US-guided LS-ICB or US‑guided CC-ICB. The local anesthetic (LA) agent used (20-ml 0.5% bupivacaine) was identical in all subjects. The block performance time and the motor and sensory block onset times were determined to be the primary outcomes. Results The block performance time and the sensory block onset time were shorter in the CC-ICB group compared to the LS-ICB group [median (interquartile range): three (2.5-3.3) vs. two (1.5-2.3) minutes, p: <0.001; five (4.4-6) vs. four (3.8-6) minutes, p = 0.022, respectively]. The number of needle redirections was lower in the CC-ICB [three (2.7-4) vs. two (one to two) times, p: <0.001]. The motor block onset time and the motor-sensory block times were similar in both groups. There were more patients with a complete sensory blockade at five and 10 minutes in the CC-ICB group than in the LS-ICB group (30% vs. 12%, p = 0.027; 66% vs. 26%, p: <0.001, respectively). No complications were observed with regard to both techniques, and patient and surgeon satisfaction levels observed were similar for both groups. Conclusion Based on our findings, the CC approach provided a shorter performance time and a faster onset of the sensory block compared to the LS approach. However, no complications were reported with respect to either technique, and similar patient and surgeon satisfaction levels were observed.

Citing Articles

Effects of different approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block on perfusion index and tissue perfusion.

Baytar C, Koksal B Ann Med. 2025; 57(1):2451765.

PMID: 39797918 PMC: 11727169. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2451765.


Costoclavicular versus lateral sagittal infraclavicular brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing upper limb orthopaedic surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

Mondal S, Sinha C, Kumari P, Kumar A, Kumar A, Agarwal P Indian J Anaesth. 2024; 68(8):693-698.

PMID: 39176120 PMC: 11338381. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_812_23.


Comparison of the classical approach and costoclavicular approach of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Garg H, Makhija P, Jain D, Kumar S, Kashyap L Indian J Anaesth. 2024; 68(7):606-615.

PMID: 39081919 PMC: 11285893. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_1124_23.


Comparing the clinical features of lateral and medial approaches of costoclavicular technique versus traditional lateral sagittal technique as infraclavicular brachial plexus block methods: a randomized controlled trial.

Bingul E, Canbaz M, Guzel M, Salviz E, Akalin B, Berkoz O BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24(1):254.

PMID: 39054425 PMC: 11270787. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02645-z.


Comparison of ultrasonography-guided lateral versus medial costoclavicular brachial plexus block in pediatric patients : A randomized clinical trial.

Cosgun M, Salviz E, Bingul E, Guzel M, Senturk E, Dinc M Anaesthesiologie. 2024; 73(2):93-100.

PMID: 38227022 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-023-01365-2.


References
1.
Monzo E, Boezaart A, Tubbs R, Sanroman-Junquera M, Nin O, Reina M . A reliable septum exists between the lateral cord and medial and posterior cords in the costoclavicular region: Clinical and microanatomical considerations in brachial plexus anesthetic blockade. Clin Anat. 2020; 34(3):411-419. DOI: 10.1002/ca.23665. View

2.
Kapral S, Krafft P, Eibenberger K, FitzGerald R, Gosch M, Weinstabl C . Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for regional anesthesia of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg. 1994; 78(3):507-13. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199403000-00016. View

3.
Brenner D, Mahon P, Iohom G, Cronin M, OFlynn C, Shorten G . Fascial layers influence the spread of injectate during ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a cadaver study. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 121(4):876-882. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.043. View

4.
Li J, Songthamwat B, Samy W, Sala-Blanch X, Karmakar M . Ultrasound-Guided Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Sonoanatomy, Technique, and Block Dynamics. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017; 42(2):233-240. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000566. View

5.
Hsu A, Tai Y, Lin K, Yao H, Chiang H, Ho B . Infraclavicular brachial plexus block in adults: a comprehensive review based on a unified nomenclature system. J Anesth. 2019; 33(3):463-477. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-019-02638-0. View