» Articles » PMID: 33909074

Measurement Indicators of Age-Friendly Communities: Findings From the AARP Age-Friendly Community Survey

Overview
Journal Gerontologist
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2021 Apr 28
PMID 33909074
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Cities and counties worldwide have adopted the concept of "age-friendly communities." These communities aspire to promote older adults' well-being by providing a safe, affordable built environment and a social environment that encourages their participation. A major limitation in this field is the lack of valid and reliable measures that capture the complex dimensionality and dynamic nature of the aging-environment interface.

Research Design And Methods: This study uses data from the AARP 2016 Age-Friendly Community Surveys (N = 3,652 adults aged 65 and older). The survey includes 62 indicators of age-friendliness, for example, outdoor spaces, transportation, housing, social participation, and community and health services. We randomly split the sample into 2 equal subsamples for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM).

Results: CFA results indicated that both the 5-factor model and the second-order factor model adequately fit the data. In the SEM 5-factor model, outdoor space (β = 0.134; p = .017), social participation (β = 0.307; p < .001), and community and health services (β = -0.149; p = .008) were associated with self-rated health, the outcome of interest. The path coefficients of housing and transportation were not significant. In the second-order factor model, people who lived in more age-friendly communities reported better self-rated health (β = 0.295; p < .001).

Discussion And Implications: Our findings show that the Age-Friendly Community Survey measures demonstrate reliability and concurrent validity. To promote older adults' well-being, practitioners, policymakers, and researchers should focus on improving their built and social environments. They can use these measures for short- and long-term planning, monitoring, and evaluating age-friendly community initiatives.

Citing Articles

Relationship between Internet use and offline leisure activities among Chinese older adult people: a moderated mediation model.

Xiang S, Deng Q, Chen B Front Public Health. 2025; 12():1458413.

PMID: 39845655 PMC: 11753352. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1458413.


Measuring the age-friendliness of cities in the Russian Federation: The translation, validation and application of the age-friendly cities and communities Questionnaire in the city of Kazan.

Ziganshina L, Garaeva A, Talipova L, Khairullin R, Dikken J, van Hoof J Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41100.

PMID: 39807523 PMC: 11728952. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41100.


The Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire: A validation study of the Hebrew version in Israel.

Ayalon L, Dikken J, van Hoof J Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e39182.

PMID: 39660191 PMC: 11629180. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39182.


"It Made Me Change the Way I Do Business": Outcomes From Age-Friendly Community Initiatives as Systems Change.

Greenfield E, Pope N Gerontologist. 2024; 65(1).

PMID: 39450442 PMC: 11638776. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnae149.


Assessing Age-Friendly Community Initiatives: Developing a Novel Survey Tool for Assessment and Evaluation.

Webster S, Robertson M, Keresztes C, Puxty J Gerontologist. 2024; 64(12).

PMID: 39422571 PMC: 11586661. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnae146.


References
1.
Menec V, Newall N, Nowicki S . Assessing Communities' Age-Friendliness: How Congruent Are Subjective Versus Objective Assessments?. J Appl Gerontol. 2014; 35(5):549-65. DOI: 10.1177/0733464814542612. View

2.
Dunlop D, Manheim L, Song J, Chang R . Gender and ethnic/racial disparities in health care utilization among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002; 57(4):S221-33. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/57.4.s221. View

3.
Garner I, Holland C . Age-friendliness of living environments from the older person's viewpoint: development of the Age-Friendly Environment Assessment Tool. Age Ageing. 2019; 49(2):193-198. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz146. View

4.
Thomese F, Broese van Groenou M . Adaptive strategies after health decline in later life: increasing the person-environment fit by adjusting the social and physical environment. Eur J Ageing. 2017; 3(4):169-177. PMC: 5546375. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-006-0038-9. View

5.
van Hoof J, Kazak J, Perek-Bialas J, Peek S . The Challenges of Urban Ageing: Making Cities Age-Friendly in Europe. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 15(11). PMC: 6266083. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15112473. View