» Articles » PMID: 33907267

A Randomised, Prospective Study of the Effects of 3% Diquafosol on Ocular Surface Following Cataract Surgery

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Apr 28
PMID 33907267
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is still no established therapeutic solution for postoperative Dry Eye Syndrome (DES) after cataract surgery, in spite of progress in surgical techniques. Diquafosol tetrasodium (DQS), a recently developed ophthalmic solution, has been reported to be effective in DES, but no study evaluated post-cataract surgery lipid layer thickness (LLT) changes in healthy patients who used DQS postoperatively. We randomly divided participants into two groups; the DQS group was treated six times daily with DQS after cataract surgery, and the sodium hyaluronate (HA) group was treated with HA in the same way. Throughout study period, the DQS group showed significantly higher tear break up time (TBUT) and LLT than HA group. In multivariate analysis, better preoperative TBUT, Schirmer's I test score, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, and LLT were significantly associated with improved postoperative outcomes in each parameter. Also, the postoperative use of DQS served as an independent parameter of better TBUT, OSDI score, and LLT in postoperative 15 weeks. Treatment with 3% DQS following cataract surgery showed more improvement in TBUT and LLT, compared with 0.1% HA. Improving TBUT and LLT preoperatively and using 3% DQS postoperatively, could be a reliable choice for managing DES after cataract surgery.Trial Registration: ISRCTN registry with ISRCTN 18755487.

Citing Articles

Tolerability of Diquas LX on tear film and meibomian glands findings in a real clinical scenario.

Arita R, Fukuoka S, Kaido M PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0305020.

PMID: 39325761 PMC: 11426461. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305020.


Management of Dry Eye Disease for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Kawahara A Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38927833 PMC: 11201055. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11060597.


Preventing and Managing Iatrogenic Dry Eye Disease during the Entire Surgical Pathway: A Study Focusing on Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery.

Giannaccare G, Barabino S, Di Zazzo A, Villani E J Clin Med. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38337442 PMC: 10856703. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030748.


Ocular Surface Ion Transport and Dry Eye Disease.

Lindgren E, Cil O, Verkman A, Pasricha N Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2024; 10(4):188-197.

PMID: 38213468 PMC: 10783585. DOI: 10.1007/s40135-022-00295-3.


The effect of 3% diquafosol on the improvement of ocular surface post cataract surgery: A meta-analysis for time of intervention.

Zhang Y, Qi Y, Xie X, Zhang F Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2023; 2(3):100063.

PMID: 37846290 PMC: 10577826. DOI: 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.100063.


References
1.
Miyake K, Yokoi N . Influence on ocular surface after cataract surgery and effect of topical diquafosol on postoperative dry eye: a multicenter prospective randomized study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017; 11:529-540. PMC: 5364011. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S129178. View

2.
Nichols K, Foulks G, Bron A, Glasgow B, Dogru M, Tsubota K . The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52(4):1922-9. PMC: 3072157. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997a. View

3.
Kang D, Lee Y, Hwang K, Koh K, Kwon Y, Kim B . Changes of tear film lipid layer thickness by 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solutions in patients with dry eye syndrome. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019; 12(10):1555-1560. PMC: 6796099. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2019.10.06. View

4.
Zhao X, Xia S, Chen Y . Comparison of the efficacy between topical diquafosol and artificial tears in the treatment of dry eye following cataract surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(39):e8174. PMC: 5626315. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008174. View

5.
Johnson M, Murphy P, Boulton M . Effectiveness of sodium hyaluronate eyedrops in the treatment of dry eye. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005; 244(1):109-12. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-005-0028-1. View