Comparison of the Caregivers' and Community Health Professionals' Views on Home Health Care Services for Disabled Older Adults: a Cross-sectional Study in Beijing, China

Overview

Journal BMC Health Serv Res

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Health Services

Date 2021 Apr 27

PMID 33902564

Citations 4

Authors

Xiaojingyuan Xu

Chunyan Zhao

Meirong Wang

Xiaolei Chen

Shuang Shao

Juan Du

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: In an era of an increasingly ageing society, part of healthcare for older adults can be provided in patients' homes, and the need for home health care services (HHCSs) is increasing. This study sought to determine whether a gap exists between the views of community health professionals and the caregivers of disabled older adults towards HHCSs in Beijing, China.

Methods: A cross-sectional study with two comparative questionnaire surveys was conducted in Beijing, China. One survey was administered to the caregivers of disabled older adults, and the other was administered to health professionals in community health service institutions (CHSIs). T-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to explore potential differences between the views of caregivers and community health professionals towards HHCSs.

Results: We received 370 valid questionnaires from caregivers and 224 questionnaires from health professionals. Of the 370 caregivers, 314 (84.9%) were willing to apply for HHCSs for the older adults, but only 20.5% (N = 76) received HHCSs. Over 80% of the caregivers accepted out-of-pocket costs less than 100 yuan per visit. Caregivers' demands on home nursing services were significantly higher than those of health guidance services (Z = - 7.725, P < 0.001). Most of the 224 health professionals chose "health professionals' personal safety cannot be guaranteed" as a problem limiting the provision of HHCSs (N = 151, 40.8%). The health professionals' attitudes towards home nursing services were significantly less positive than those towards health guidance services (Z = - 10.081, P < 0.001). For home nursing services, health professionals' attitude scores were lower than the caregivers' demand scores (Z = - 4.960, P < 0.001), while for health guidance services, health professionals' attitude scores were higher than the caregivers' demand scores (Z = - 8.373, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Gaps exist between the views of caregivers and health professionals on HHCSs. Compared to health professionals with a higher willingness to provide health guidance services, caregivers need home nursing services. Feasible policies should be implemented to safeguard the rights and interests of health professionals, and qualified health professionals should be trained for HHCSs.

Citing Articles

Demand analysis of health care services for community-dwelling breast cancer survivors based on the Kano model: A cross-sectional study.

Zhang M, Zhang L, Zhi X, Cheng F, Yao Y, Deng R Int J Nurs Sci. 2024; 11(2):171-178.

PMID: 38707692 PMC: 11064550. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.03.015.

Developing Family-Community Interactive program for the disabled older adults at home: a study protocol.

Wang P, Niu M, Chen Y, Wang S, Wu C, Zhao D BMC Geriatr. 2023; 23(1):609.

PMID: 37773100 PMC: 10540501. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04273-7.

Nurses' Willingness and Demand for Internet+Home Care Services and the Associated Factors in Municipal Hospitals in China: Cross-Sectional Survey.

Zhang J, Peng S, Hou J, Ma G, Liu Y, Fan Y J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e45602.

PMID: 37540546 PMC: 10439466. DOI: 10.2196/45602.

Nurses' Willingness and Demand for Internet +home Care Services and Its Influencing Factors in Different Levels of Hospitals in China - A Nationwide Survey.

Ma G, Hou J, Peng S, Luo L, Xu R, Liu Y Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022; 15:1395-1405.

PMID: 35911086 PMC: 9326896. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S367412.

References

Chang S, Yang W, Deguchi H . Care providers, access to care, and the Long-term Care Nursing Insurance in China: An agent-based simulation. Soc Sci Med. 2019; 244:112667. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112667. View

Fang E, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Jahn H, Li J, Ling L, Guo H . A research agenda for aging in China in the 21st century. Ageing Res Rev. 2015; 24(Pt B):197-205. PMC: 5179143. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2015.08.003. View

Hammersley V, Donaghy E, Parker R, McNeilly H, Atherton H, Bikker A . Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2019; 69(686):e595-e604. PMC: 6607843. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X704573. View

Roth G, Wolter A, Stolle C, Rothgang H . The long and bumpy road to outcome-oriented management of long-term care in Germany: implementation of the Resident Assessment Instrument in home-care services. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2013; 29(3):316-29. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2186. View

Gong F, Baron S, Ayala L, Stock L, McDevitt S, Heaney C . The role for community-based participatory research in formulating policy initiatives: promoting safety and health for in-home care workers and their consumers. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99 Suppl 3:S531-8. PMC: 2774173. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.152405. View

Cheung P . Changing Perception of the Rights and Responsibilities in Family Care for Older People in Urban China. J Aging Soc Policy. 2019; 31(4):298-320. DOI: 10.1080/08959420.2019.1626324. View

Mitra M, Bogen K, Long-Bellil L, Heaphy D . Unmet needs for home and community-based services among persons with disabilities in Massachusetts. Disabil Health J. 2011; 4(4):219-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.08.003. View

Gilmour H . Formal home care use in Canada. Health Rep. 2018; 29(9):3-9. View

Kroger T, Leinonen A . Transformation by stealth: the retargeting of home care services in Finland. Health Soc Care Community. 2011; 20(3):319-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01047.x. View

10.

Balia S, Brau R . A country for old men? Long-term home care utilization in Europe. Health Econ. 2013; 23(10):1185-212. DOI: 10.1002/hec.2977. View

11.

Hidiroglu S, Kulbay H, Karavus M, Onsuz F . Expectations, requirements, and problems of family health care workers providing home services in Turkey. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018; 68(11):1696-1698. View

12.

Carmona-Torres J, Rodriguez-Borrego M, Laredo-Aguilera J, Lopez-Soto P, Santacruz-Salas E, Cobo-Cuenca A . Disability for basic and instrumental activities of daily living in older individuals. PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0220157. PMC: 6660130. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220157. View

13.

Quinn M, Markkanen P, Galligan C, Sama S, Kriebel D, Gore R . Occupational health of home care aides: results of the safe home care survey. Occup Environ Med. 2015; 73(4):237-45. PMC: 4819650. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103031. View

14.

Wang Q, Zhou Y, Ding X, Ying X . Demand for Long-Term Care Insurance in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 15(1). PMC: 5800106. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15010006. View

15.

Koike S, Furui Y . Long-term care-service use and increases in care-need level among home-based elderly people in a Japanese urban area. Health Policy. 2013; 110(1):94-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.12.011. View

16.

Markkanen P, Galligan C, Quinn M . Safety Risks Among Home Infusion Nurses and Other Home Health Care Providers. J Infus Nurs. 2017; 40(4):215-223. PMC: 5502120. DOI: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000227. View

17.

Wang Y, Leifheit-Limson E, Fine J, Pandolfi M, Gao Y, Liu F . National Trends and Geographic Variation in Availability of Home Health Care: 2002-2015. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017; 65(7):1434-1440. PMC: 5507741. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14811. View

18.

Zhang Y, Yu X . Evaluation of Long-Term Care Insurance Policy in Chinese Pilot Cities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(20). PMC: 6843341. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16203826. View

19.

Lim J, Noh W, Kim E, Choi K . A review of the present state and future policy alternatives for home visit nursing services in Korea. Public Health Nurs. 2014; 31(4):354-62. DOI: 10.1111/phn.12106. View

20.

Liang Y, Liang H, Corazzini K . Predictors and patterns of home health care utilization among older adults in Shanghai, China. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2019; 38(1):29-42. DOI: 10.1080/01621424.2018.1483280. View