» Articles » PMID: 33902040

The Use of a Robot to Insert an Electrode Array of Cochlear Implants in the Cochlea: A Feasibility Study and Preliminary Results

Overview
Publisher Karger
Date 2021 Apr 26
PMID 33902040
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Cochlear implants (CIs) are commonly used for the rehabilitation of profound bilateral hearing loss. However, patients with substantial residual acoustic hearing are potential CI candidates. Because of both improvements in technology and advancements in surgical techniques, it may be possible to preserve hearing to some extent. For more than a decade, it has been suggested that robots are used to perform middle ear surgery. We evaluated the use of the RobOtol® otologic robot specifically to insert CI electrodes into the inner ear.

Methods: CI surgery with the conventional approach was performed under general anesthesia. The MED-El Flex 24-electrode array was inserted using RobOtol®. Video recordings were used to calculate the speed of insertion. The positions of the electrodes were evaluated using a cone beam CT. All subjects underwent pure-tone audiometry tests before and after surgery, and the pure-tone average (PTA) was calculated from 250 to 4,000 Hz.

Results: The robot inserted implants in 5 patients, and complete insertion of the electrode array was achieved. The speed of insertion of the electrode array was 0.88 ± 0.12 mm/s. The mean loss of the PTA for 5 frequencies (250, 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz) was 13.60 ± 7.70 dB. Only 1 patient showed a loss of the PTA by >20 dB. For these 5 patients, the cone beam CT findings showed that all the electrode arrays were in the tympanic ramp and had a grade of 0. The results were compared with those obtained from a cohort of 17 patients who underwent manual implantation of a MED-El Flex 24-electrode array.

Conclusion: To minimize disturbance to the cochlea while atraumatic electrode arrays are inserted, electrodes can be inserted at a constant, slow speed in the inner ear with the assistance of the RobOtol® robot in a normal clinical surgical setting.

Citing Articles

Preclinical evaluation of a hydraulic actuation system with guide tube for robotic cochlear implant electrode insertion.

Cramer J, Salcher R, Frohlich M, Bottcher-Rebmann G, Artukarslan E, Lenarz T Biomed Eng Online. 2025; 24(1):19.

PMID: 39953541 PMC: 11829445. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-025-01338-z.


Robotic assistance during cochlear implantation: the rationale for consistent, controlled speed of electrode array insertion.

Kashani R, Henslee A, Nelson R, Hansen M Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1335994.

PMID: 38318440 PMC: 10839068. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1335994.


Combining Intraoperative Electrocochleography with Robotics-Assisted Electrode Array Insertion.

Kashani R, Kocharyan A, Bennion D, Scheperle R, Etler C, Oleson J Otol Neurotol. 2024; 45(2):143-149.

PMID: 38206061 PMC: 10786337. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004094.


Word Recognition with a Cochlear Implant in Relation to Prediction and Electrode Position.

Franke-Trieger A, Lailach S, Shetty J, Murrmann K, Zahnert T, Neudert M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38202190 PMC: 10780042. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010183.


The impact of the size and angle of the cochlear basal turn on translocation of a pre-curved mid-scala cochlear implant electrode.

Pai I, Connor S, Komninos C, Ourselin S, Bergeles C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):1024.

PMID: 38200135 PMC: 10781700. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47133-5.