» Articles » PMID: 33897962

The Feasibility of Blinding Residency Programs to USMLE Step 1 Scores During GME Application, Interview, and Match Processes

Overview
Journal J Grad Med Educ
Date 2021 Apr 26
PMID 33897962
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: With the recent announcement that Step 1 score reporting will soon change to pass/fail, residency programs will need to reconsider their recruitment processes.

Objective: We (1) evaluated the feasibility of blinding residency programs to applicants' Step 1 scores and their number of attempts throughout the recruitment process; (2) described the selection process that resulted from the blinding; and (3) reviewed if a program's initial rank list, created before scores were known, would be changed before submission for the Match.

Methods: During the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 recruitment seasons, all programs at a single sponsoring institution were invited to develop selection criteria in the absence of Step 1 data, and to remain blinded to this data throughout recruitment. Participating programs were surveyed to determine factors affecting feasibility and metrics used for residency selection. Once unblinded to Step 1 scores, programs had the option to change their initial rank lists.

Results: Of 24 residency programs, 4 participated (17%) in the first year: emergency medicine, neurology, pediatrics, and psychiatry. The second year had the same participants, with the addition of family and community medicine and radiation oncology (n = 6, 25%). Each program was able to determine mission-specific qualities in the absence of Step 1 data. In both years, one program made changes to the final rank list.

Conclusions: It was feasible for programs to establish metrics for residency recruitment in the absence of Step 1 data, and most programs made no changes to final rank lists after Step 1 scores were known.

Citing Articles

Selection and Recruitment Strategies among Competitive Pediatric Training Programs and the Impact of Diversity.

Tiyyagura G, Weiss J, Goldman M, Crawley D, Langhan M Acad Pediatr. 2023; 24(2):338-346.

PMID: 37748536 PMC: 11217005. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.09.010.

References
1.
Sharma A, Schauer D, Kelleher M, Kinnear B, Sall D, Warm E . USMLE Step 2 CK: Best Predictor of Multimodal Performance in an Internal Medicine Residency. J Grad Med Educ. 2019; 11(4):412-419. PMC: 6699543. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00099.1. View

2.
Rubright J, Jodoin M, Barone M . Examining Demographics, Prior Academic Performance, and United States Medical Licensing Examination Scores. Acad Med. 2018; 94(3):364-370. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002366. View

3.
Jones Jr M, Yamashita T, Ross R, Gong J . Positive predictive value of medical student specialty choices. BMC Med Educ. 2018; 18(1):33. PMC: 5845137. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1138-x. View

4.
Brustman L, Williams F, Carroll K, Lurie H, Ganz E, Langer O . The effect of blinded versus nonblinded interviews in the resident selection process. J Grad Med Educ. 2011; 2(3):349-53. PMC: 2951773. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00051.1. View

5.
McGaghie W, Cohen E, Wayne D . Are United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 and 2 scores valid measures for postgraduate medical residency selection decisions?. Acad Med. 2010; 86(1):48-52. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ffacdb. View