» Articles » PMID: 33891687

Underperformance of Clinical Risk Scores in Identifying Vascular Ultrasound-based High Cardiovascular Risk in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Overview
Date 2021 Apr 23
PMID 33891687
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of eight clinical risk prediction scores to identify individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, as defined by the presence of atherosclerotic plaques.

Methods: CVD risk was estimated in 210 eligible SLE patients without prior CVD or diabetes mellitus (female: 93.3%, mean age: 44.8 ± 12 years) using five generic (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), Framingham Risk Score (FRS), Pooled Cohort Risk Equations (ASCVD), Globorisk, Prospective Cardiovascular Münster Study risk calculator (PROCAM)) and three 'SLE-adapted' (modified-SCORE, modified-FRS, QRESEARCH risk estimator, version 3 (QRISK3)) CVD risk scores, as well as ultrasound examination of the carotid and femoral arteries. Calibration, discrimination and classification measures to identify high CVD risk based on the presence of atherosclerotic plaques were assessed for all risk models. CVD risk reclassification was applied for all scores by incorporating ultrasound results.

Results: Moderate calibration (p-value range from 0.38 to 0.63) and discrimination (area under the curve 0.73-0.84), and low-to-moderate sensitivity (8.3-71.4%) and classification ability (Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) 0.25-0.47) were observed for all risk models to identify patients with plaques at any arterial site as high-risk. MCC was improved for modified-FRS versus FRS (0.43 vs 0.36), but not for modified-SCORE versus SCORE (0.25 vs 0.25). Based on plaque presence, CVD risk was upgraded to high-risk in 10%, 16.1%, 20.5%, 21.5%, 24%, 28.2% and 28.6% of cases classified as non-high-risk by QRISK3, modified-FRS, Globorisk, FRS/PROCAM, ASCVD, modified-SCORE and SCORE, respectively.

Conclusions: Most of the five generic and three 'SLE-adapted' clinical risk scores underestimated high CVD risk defined by atherosclerotic plaque presence in patients with SLE.

Citing Articles

Predicting the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event in systemic lupus erythematosus: a Chinese SLE treatment and research group study XXVI.

Huang C, Li Y, Wang Z, Lin S, Zhao J, Wang Q RMD Open. 2024; 10(3).

PMID: 39313305 PMC: 11418496. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004425.


Microvascular Density Analysis of Patients with Inactive Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-A Two-Year Follow-Up Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study.

Leclaire M, Esser E, Dierse S, Koch R, Zimmermann J, Storp J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 38792521 PMC: 11122300. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102979.


A predictive model for premature atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus based on clinical characteristics.

Liang R, Xu H, Yao R, Pei W, Wang Z, Liang R Clin Rheumatol. 2024; 43(5):1541-1550.

PMID: 38565803 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-024-06934-3.


Cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a cross-sectional performance analysis of nine clinical risk prediction tools.

Drosos G, Konstantonis G, Sfikakis P, Tektonidou M RMD Open. 2023; 9(4).

PMID: 38016710 PMC: 10685980. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003601.


Application of EULAR and European Society of Cardiology recommendations with regard to blood pressure and lipid management in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Drosos G, Konstantonis G, Sfikakis P, Tektonidou M RMD Open. 2023; 9(3).

PMID: 37558493 PMC: 10414104. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003326.