» Articles » PMID: 33886064

Robotic Colorectal Surgery and Ergonomics

Overview
Journal J Robot Surg
Publisher Springer
Date 2021 Apr 22
PMID 33886064
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Improved ergonomics for the operating surgeon may be an advantage of robotic colorectal surgery. Perceived robotic ergonomic advantages in visualisation include better exposure, three-dimensional vision, surgeon camera control, and line of sight screen location. Postural advantages include seated position and freedom from the constraints of the sterile operating field. Manipulation benefits include articulated instruments with seven degrees of freedom movement, elimination of fulcrum effect, tremor filtration, and scaling of movement. Potential ergonomic detriments of robotic surgery include lack of haptic feedback, visual, and mental strain from increased operating time and interruptions to workflow from crowding.

Citing Articles

Does robotic assisted surgery mitigate obesity related systemic inflammatory response and clinical outcomes in left sided colorectal cancer resections?.

Ingham A, McSorley S, McMillan D, Mansouri D, Chong D, MacKay G J Robot Surg. 2025; 19(1):98.

PMID: 40042780 PMC: 11882609. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02261-0.


Total Mesorectal Excision with New Robotic Platforms: A Scoping Review.

Marchegiani F, Schena C, Santambrogio G, Emma E, Tsimailo I, DeAngelis N J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518542 PMC: 11546395. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216403.


Learning Curve Analysis of Single-Incision Ovarian Cystectomy: Comparative Study of Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques.

Kim S, Lee S, Seol A, Lee S, Song J, Lee J J Pers Med. 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39201977 PMC: 11355174. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14080785.


Cologne ergonomic measurement for robotic surgery (CEMRobSurg) using the Hugo™ RAS System.

Brunner S, Muller D, Krauss D, Datta R, Eckhoff J, Storms C Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(10):6128-6138.

PMID: 39187727 PMC: 11458657. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11129-7.


Oncologic outcomes and survival of modern surgical approaches for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).

Freeman H, Mudgway R, Tran Z, Kim R, Lum S, Namm J Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(11):6854-6864.

PMID: 39179690 PMC: 11525429. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11152-8.


References
1.
Epstein S, Sparer E, Tran B, Ruan Q, Dennerlein J, Singhal D . Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons and Interventionalists: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2017; 153(2):e174947. PMC: 5838584. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4947. View

2.
Stylopoulos N, Rattner D . Robotics and ergonomics. Surg Clin North Am. 2004; 83(6):1321-37. DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00161-0. View

3.
Falk V, Mintz D, Grunenfelder J, Fann J, Burdon T . Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15(11):1282-8. DOI: 10.1007/s004640080053. View

4.
Hanna G, Shimi S, Cuschieri A . Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet. 1998; 351(9098):248-51. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08005-7. View

5.
Wang T, Zheng B . 3D presentation in surgery: a review of technology and adverse effects. J Robot Surg. 2019; 13(3):363-370. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-00900-3. View