» Articles » PMID: 33884375

"Is That Something That Should Concern Me?": a Qualitative Exploration of Parent Understanding of Their Child's Genomic Test Results

Overview
Journal HGG Adv
Specialty Genetics
Date 2021 Apr 22
PMID 33884375
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genetic counselors are trained to deliver complicated genomic test results to parents of pediatric patients. However, there is limited knowledge on how parents perceive this information and what they understand about the results. This research aims to qualitatively explore parents' experiences receiving genomic test results for their children. As part of formative research for the NYCKidSeq Study, we recruited a purposive sample of parents of 22 children stratified by child race/ethnicity and test result classification (positive, uncertain, or negative) and conducted in-depth interviews using a semi-structured guide. Analysis was conducted using grounded theory's constant comparative method across cases and themes. Parents described different elements of understanding: genetics knowledge; significance and meaning of positive, uncertain, or negative results; and implications for the health of their child and family. Parents reported challenges understanding technical details and significance of their child's results but gladly allowed their providers to be custodians of this information. However, of the different elements of understanding described, parents cared most deeply about being able to understand implications for their child's and family's health. These findings suggest that a counseling approach that primarily addresses parents' desire to understand how to best care for their child and family may be more appropriate than an information-heavy approach focused on technical details. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings in larger parent cohorts and to explore ways genetic counseling can support parents' preferences without sacrificing important components of parent understanding and overall satisfaction with their experiences with genomic medicine.

Citing Articles

Investigating the Impact of Screen-Sharing Visual Aids during Genomic Results Disclosure via Telehealth in Diverse Families in the TeleKidSeq Pilot Study.

Odgis J, Kelly N, Sebastin M, Scarimbolo L, Golfinopoulos L, Insel B Public Health Genomics. 2025; 28(1):85-101.

PMID: 39827879 PMC: 11839312. DOI: 10.1159/000542444.


Employing effective recruitment and retention strategies to engage a diverse pediatric population in genomics research.

Ramos M, Bonini K, Scarimbolo L, Kelly N, Insel B, Suckiel S Am J Hum Genet. 2024; 111(12):2607-2617.

PMID: 39566494 PMC: 11639093. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.10.015.


The NYCKidSeq randomized controlled trial: Impact of GUÍA digitally enhanced genetic results disclosure in diverse families.

Suckiel S, Kelly N, Odgis J, Gallagher K, Sebastin M, Bonini K Am J Hum Genet. 2023; 110(12):2029-2041.

PMID: 38006881 PMC: 10716481. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.10.016.


What matters to parents? A scoping review of parents' service experiences and needs regarding genetic testing for rare diseases.

Crellin E, Martyn M, McClaren B, Gaff C Eur J Hum Genet. 2023; 31(8):869-878.

PMID: 37308600 PMC: 10400618. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01376-y.


Key drivers of family-level utility of pediatric genomic sequencing: a qualitative analysis to support preference research.

Smith H, Bonkowski E, Deloge R, Gutierrez A, Recinos A, Lavelle T Eur J Hum Genet. 2022; 31(4):445-452.

PMID: 36434257 PMC: 10133279. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01245-0.


References
1.
Fitzgerald-Butt S, Bodine A, Fry K, Ash J, Zaidi A, Garg V . Measuring genetic knowledge: a brief survey instrument for adolescents and adults. Clin Genet. 2015; 89(2):235-43. PMC: 5215811. DOI: 10.1111/cge.12618. View

2.
Underhill-Blazey M, Stopfer J, Chittenden A, Nayak M, Lansang K, Lederman R . Development and testing of the KnowGene scale to assess general cancer genetic knowledge related to multigene panel testing. Patient Educ Couns. 2019; 102(8):1558-1564. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.014. View

3.
Lowe C, Beach M, Roter D . Genetic counselor implicit bias and its effects on cognitive and affective exchanges in racially discordant simulations. J Genet Couns. 2020; 29(3):332-341. PMC: 7272306. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1243. View

4.
Madlensky L, Trepanier A, Cragun D, Lerner B, Shannon K, Zierhut H . A Rapid Systematic Review of Outcomes Studies in Genetic Counseling. J Genet Couns. 2017; 26(3):361-378. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0067-x. View

5.
Dodgson J . Reflexivity in Qualitative Research. J Hum Lact. 2019; 35(2):220-222. DOI: 10.1177/0890334419830990. View