» Articles » PMID: 33883086

Impact of Clinical and Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease As Assessed by Coronary Artery Calcium in COVID-19

Abstract

Background And Aims: The potential impact of coronary atherosclerosis, as detected by coronary artery calcium, on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients remains unsettled. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of clinical and subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD), as assessed by coronary artery calcium score (CAC), in a large, unselected population of hospitalized COVID-19 patients undergoing non-gated chest computed tomography (CT) for clinical practice.

Methods: SARS-CoV 2 positive patients from the multicenter (16 Italian hospitals), retrospective observational SCORE COVID-19 (calcium score for COVID-19 Risk Evaluation) registry were stratified in three groups: (a) "clinical CAD" (prior revascularization history), (b) "subclinical CAD" (CAC >0), (c) "No CAD" (CAC = 0). Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality and the secondary endpoint was a composite of myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident (MI/CVA).

Results: Amongst 1625 patients (male 67.2%, median age 69 [interquartile range 58-77] years), 31%, 57.8% and 11.1% had no, subclinical and clinical CAD, respectively. Increasing rates of in-hospital mortality (11.3% vs. 27.3% vs. 39.8%, p < 0.001) and MI/CVA events (2.3% vs. 3.8% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.001) were observed for patients with no CAD vs. subclinical CAD vs clinical CAD, respectively. The association with in-hospital mortality was independent of in-study outcome predictors (age, peripheral artery disease, active cancer, hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, LDH, aerated lung volume): subclinical CAD vs. No CAD: adjusted hazard ratio (adj-HR) 2.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-7.17, p=0.025); clinical CAD vs. No CAD: adj-HR 3.74 (95% CI 1.21-11.60, p=0.022). Among patients with subclinical CAD, increasing CAC burden was associated with higher rates of in-hospital mortality (20.5% vs. 27.9% vs. 38.7% for patients with CAC score thresholds≤100, 101-400 and > 400, respectively, p < 0.001). The adj-HR per 50 points increase in CAC score 1.007 (95%CI 1.001-1.013, p=0.016). Cardiovascular risk factors were not independent predictors of in-hospital mortality when CAD presence and extent were taken into account.

Conclusions: The presence and extent of CAD are associated with in-hospital mortality and MI/CVA among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 disease and they appear to be a better prognostic gauge as compared to a clinical cardiovascular risk assessment.

Citing Articles

Erector Spinae Muscle to Epicardial Visceral Fat Ratio on Chest CT Predicts the Severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Shimada T, Maetani T, Chubachi S, Tanabe N, Asakura T, Namkoong H J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025; 16(1):e13721.

PMID: 39868664 PMC: 11770476. DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13721.


Coronary artery calcification score as a prognostic indicator for COVID-19 mortality: evidence from a retrospective cohort study in Iran.

Hedayati Goudarzi M, Abrotan S, Ziaie N, Amin K, Saravi M, Jalali S Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(6):3227-3232.

PMID: 38846865 PMC: 11152861. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001661.


CT coronary artery calcification score as a prognostic marker in COVID-19.

Meyer H, Gottschling S, Borggrefe J, Surov A J Thorac Dis. 2023; 15(10):5559-5565.

PMID: 37969270 PMC: 10636427. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-728.


Clinical utilization of artificial intelligence-based COVID-19 pneumonia quantification using chest computed tomography - a multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan.

Tanaka H, Maetani T, Chubachi S, Tanabe N, Shiraishi Y, Asakura T Respir Res. 2023; 24(1):241.

PMID: 37798709 PMC: 10552312. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-023-02530-2.


A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence and impact of coronary artery disease in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Merzah M, Sulaiman D, Karim A, Khalil M, Gupta S, Almuzaini Y Heliyon. 2023; 9(9):e19493.

PMID: 37681130 PMC: 10480662. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19493.


References
1.
Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, Antonelli M, Cabrini L, Castelli A . Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA. 2020; 323(16):1574-1581. PMC: 7136855. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.5394. View

2.
Evans P, Rainger G, Mason J, Guzik T, Osto E, Stamataki Z . Endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19: a position paper of the ESC Working Group for Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology, and the ESC Council of Basic Cardiovascular Science. Cardiovasc Res. 2020; 116(14):2177-2184. PMC: 7454368. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa230. View

3.
Thygesen K, Alpert J, Jaffe A, Chaitman B, Bax J, Morrow D . Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72(18):2231-2264. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038. View

4.
Cosco T, Best J, Davis D, Bryden D, Arkill S, van Oppen J . What is the relationship between validated frailty scores and mortality for adults with COVID-19 in acute hospital care? A systematic review. Age Ageing. 2021; 50(3):608-616. PMC: 7929406. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab008. View

5.
Fovino L, Cademartiri F, Tarantini G . Subclinical coronary artery disease in COVID-19 patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020; 21(9):1055-1056. PMC: 7454480. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa202. View