» Articles » PMID: 33882863

Growth Mixture Models: a Case Example of the Longitudinal Analysis of Patient-reported Outcomes Data Captured by a Clinical Registry

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Apr 22
PMID 33882863
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: An assumption in many analyses of longitudinal patient-reported outcome (PRO) data is that there is a single population following a single health trajectory. One approach that may help researchers move beyond this traditional assumption, with its inherent limitations, is growth mixture modelling (GMM), which can identify and assess multiple unobserved trajectories of patients' health outcomes. We describe the process that was undertaken for a GMM analysis of longitudinal PRO data captured by a clinical registry for outpatients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods: This expository paper describes the modelling approach and some methodological issues that require particular attention, including (a) determining the metric of time, (b) specifying the GMMs, and (c) including predictors of membership in the identified latent classes (groups or subtypes of patients with distinct trajectories). An example is provided of a longitudinal analysis of PRO data (patients' responses to the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) Questionnaire) collected between 2008 and 2016 for a population-based cardiac registry and deterministically linked with administrative health data.

Results: In determining the metric of time, multiple processes were required to ensure that "time" accounted for both the frequency and timing of the measurement occurrences in light of the variability in both the number of measures taken and the intervals between those measures. In specifying the GMM, convergence issues, a common problem that results in unreliable model estimates, required constrained parameter exploration techniques. For the identification of predictors of the latent classes, the 3-step (stepwise) approach was selected such that the addition of predictor variables did not change class membership itself.

Conclusions: GMM can be a valuable tool for classifying multiple unique PRO trajectories that have previously been unobserved in real-world applications; however, their use requires substantial transparency regarding the processes underlying model building as they can directly affect the results and therefore their interpretation.

Citing Articles

Prediction of post-hemorrhagic ventricular dilatation trajectory using a growth mixture model in preterm infants.

Musiime G, Mohammad K, Momin S, Kwong G, Riva-Cambrin J, Scott J Pediatr Res. 2024; 97(1):213-221.

PMID: 38982166 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03396-w.


Health-related social control among U.S. adults ages 30-80: Associations with alcohol use over four years.

Tucker J, Rodriguez A, Green Jr H, Seelam R, Henshel B, Pollard M Soc Sci Med. 2024; 352:117004.

PMID: 38815285 PMC: 11239279. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117004.


Characterizing hospitalization trajectories in the high-need, high-cost population using electronic health record data.

Lee S, French B, Balucan F, McCann M, Vasilevskis E Health Aff Sch. 2024; 1(6):qxad077.

PMID: 38756367 PMC: 10986247. DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxad077.


Interrelations of resilience factors and their incremental impact for mental health: insights from network modeling using a prospective study across seven timepoints.

Schafer S, Fritz J, Sopp M, Kunzler A, von Boros L, Tuscher O Transl Psychiatry. 2023; 13(1):328.

PMID: 37872216 PMC: 10593776. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-023-02603-2.


Longitudinal trajectories of atherogenic index of plasma and risks of cardiovascular diseases: results from the Korean genome and epidemiology study.

Chun D, Lee Y, Lee J, Lee J Thromb J. 2023; 21(1):99.

PMID: 37723571 PMC: 10506251. DOI: 10.1186/s12959-023-00542-y.


References
1.
Huang D, Brecht M, Hara M, Hser Y . Influences of a Covariate on Growth Mixture Modeling. J Drug Issues. 2011; 40(1):173-194. PMC: 3153912. DOI: 10.1177/002204261004000110. View

2.
Gilthorpe M, Dahly D, Tu Y, Kubzansky L, Goodman E . Challenges in modelling the random structure correctly in growth mixture models and the impact this has on model mixtures. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2014; 5(3):197-205. PMC: 4098080. DOI: 10.1017/S2040174414000130. View

3.
Kwon J, Sawatzky R, Baumbusch J, Ratner P . Patient-reported outcomes and the identification of subgroups of atrial fibrillation patients: a retrospective cohort study of linked clinical registry and administrative data. Qual Life Res. 2021; 30(6):1547-1559. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02777-6. View

4.
Berlin K, Parra G, Williams N . An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling (part 2): longitudinal latent class growth analysis and growth mixture models. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013; 39(2):188-203. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst085. View

5.
Bell M, Kenward M, Fairclough D, Horton N . Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not. BMJ. 2013; 346:e8668. PMC: 4688419. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e8668. View