» Articles » PMID: 33881388

Reaching "hard to Reach" Workers: Evaluating Approaches to Disseminate Worker Safety Information Via the Mexican Consular Network

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2021 Apr 21
PMID 33881388
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mexican immigrants suffer a disproportionately large number of work-related injuries and deaths given their share of the workforce. Barriers of language, culture, and mistrust are often cited as factors that complicate efforts to reach these workers with occupational safety and health (OSH) interventions. By partnering with the Mexican government and its consulate network in the United States, researchers from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health were able to assess the impact of four different information dissemination approaches (posters, passively distributed brochures, actively distributed brochures, and video kiosks) in Spanish in a five-phase study. Exit interviews conducted with Mexicans seeking consular services indicated that while nearly all respondents considered OSH to be of importance, significant differences in impact measures, such as noticing the materials and liking of content, were found when comparing the different approaches. Despite these differences, even the least effective approaches were noticed by large numbers of individuals and significantly increased their stated behavioral intentions regarding OSH. Considering all materials together, significantly more participants reported liking the materials (p < 0.001) than did not, learning something new (p < 0.01), trusting the information (p < 0.05), intending to seek out additional OSH information (p < 0.01), and intending to speak to their bosses about OSH (p < 0.05). These findings contribute to building an evidence base for moving research knowledge into practice, which is an essential, but often overlooked, element of occupational safety and health research, particularly among workers from underserved communities.

Citing Articles

Disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake, attitudes, and experiences between food system and non-food system essential workers.

Smarsh B, Yankey D, Hung M, Blanck H, Kriss J, Flynn M J Agric Food Syst Community Dev. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 39286535 PMC: 11403359. DOI: 10.5304/jafscd.2024.132.012.


"Caminando Con Riesgo": perceptions of occupational injury, workplace safety and workers rights among Spanish-speaking hospitalized patients.

Zeidan A, Cortes J, Marcovitch H, Chicas R, Smith R, Stevens A Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1347534.

PMID: 38716243 PMC: 11074346. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1347534.


Mixed messages and COVID-19 prevention: Why information isn't always enough to protect meat processing workers.

Siven J, Coburn J, Call T, Mahoney D, Flores R, Kaur H AJPM Focus. 2023; :100128.

PMID: 37362400 PMC: 10284435. DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100128.


The impact of COVID-19 and access to health services in the Hispanic/Mexican population living in the United States.

Rangel Gomez M, Alcocer Varela J, Salazar Jimenez S, Olivares Marin L, Rosales C Front Public Health. 2022; 10:977792.

PMID: 36504982 PMC: 9732264. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.977792.


Worker Perspectives on COVID-19 Risks: A Qualitative Study of Latino Construction Workers in Oakland, California.

Meza E, Giglio L, Franco A, Rodriguez E, Stock L, Balmes J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(16).

PMID: 36011454 PMC: 9408167. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19169822.


References
1.
Flynn M, Eggerth D, Jacobson Jr C . Undocumented status as a social determinant of occupational safety and health: The workers' perspective. Am J Ind Med. 2015; 58(11):1127-37. PMC: 4632487. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22531. View

2.
Fujishiro K, Gong F, Baron S, Jacobson Jr C, DeLaney S, Flynn M . Translating questionnaire items for a multi-lingual worker population: the iterative process of translation and cognitive interviews with English-, Spanish-, and Chinese-speaking workers. Am J Ind Med. 2009; 53(2):194-203. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20733. View

3.
Dutta-Bergman M . Primary sources of health information: comparisons in the domain of health attitudes, health cognitions, and health behaviors. Health Commun. 2004; 16(3):273-88. DOI: 10.1207/S15327027HC1603_1. View

4.
Valerio M, Rodriguez N, Winkler P, Lopez J, Dennison M, Liang Y . Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16(1):146. PMC: 5084459. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0242-z. View

5.
Souza K, Steege A, Baron S . Surveillance of occupational health disparities: challenges and opportunities. Am J Ind Med. 2010; 53(2):84-94. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20777. View