» Articles » PMID: 33878421

The Potential for Midtreatment Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) Score to Individualize Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Abstract

Purpose: Our individualized functional response adaptive approach to liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with assessment of indocyanine green (ICG) retention at baseline and midtreatment to detect subclinical changes in liver function, permitting dose adjustment, has decreased toxicity while preserving efficacy. We hypothesized that assessment of the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score at baseline and midtreatment would allow for more practical identification of patients at risk for treatment-related toxicity (TRT).

Methods And Materials: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were treated on 3 prospective institutional review board-approved trials using baseline and midtreatment ICG to deliver individualized functional response adaptive liver SBRT. Patients received 3 or 5 fractions, with fraction 3 followed by a 1-month treatment break. TRT was a ≥2-point rise in Child-Pugh score within 6 months of SBRT. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for assessment of TRT. Area under the receiver operating curve was used to compare predictive ability across models.

Results: In total, 151 patients underwent 166 treatments. Baseline Child-Pugh class and ALBI grade were A (66.9%), B (31.3%), or C (1.8%) and 1 (25.9%), 2 (65.7%), or 3 (8.4%), respectively. Thirty-five patients (20.3%) experienced TRT. On univariate analysis, baseline ALBI (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.24-2.62; P = .02), baseline ICG (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.17-2.35; P = .04), and change in ALBI (OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.29-7.32; P = .003) were associated with increased odds of TRT. ALBI-centric models performed similarly to ICG-centric models on multivariate analyses predicting toxicity (area under the receiver operating curve of 0.79 for both). In a model incorporating baseline and midtreatment change in ALBI and ICG, both ALBI values were statistically significantly associated with toxicity, whereas ICG values were not.

Conclusions: Incorporation of midtreatment change in ALBI in addition to baseline ALBI improves the ability to predict TRT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving SBRT. Our findings suggest that functional response adaptive treatment could be implemented in a practical manner because the ALBI score is easily obtained from standard laboratory values.

Citing Articles

The role of ALBI score in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for locally advanced primary liver tumors: a pooled analysis of two prospective studies.

Gkika E, Radicioni G, Eichhorst A, Kirste S, Sprave T, Nicolay N Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1427332.

PMID: 39421444 PMC: 11484445. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1427332.


Albumin-bilirubin score is a useful predictor of worsening liver reserve after stereotactic body radiation therapy in elderly Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Yoshino Y, Suzuki G, Shiomi H, Kimoto T, Seri S, Yamazaki H J Radiat Res. 2024; 65(2):244-250.

PMID: 38415344 PMC: 10959440. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae006.


Evolution of Response-Based Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Cancer.

Elaimy A, Cao Y, Lawrence T Cancer J. 2023; 29(5):266-271.

PMID: 37796644 PMC: 10558084. DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000679.


Predictive Power of the Albumin-Bilirubin Score for Hepatotoxicity in Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Joo J, Jeon H, Kim D, Kim W, Nam J, Kim D Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(15).

PMID: 37568593 PMC: 10416911. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153777.


A Phase II Study of Optimized Individualized Adaptive Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Herr D, Wang C, Mendiratta-Lala M, Matuszak M, Mayo C, Cao Y Clin Cancer Res. 2023; 29(19):3852-3858.

PMID: 37471457 PMC: 10592290. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1044.


References
1.
Cousins M, Morris E, Maurino C, Devasia T, Karnak D, Ray D . TNFR1 and the TNFα axis as a targetable mediator of liver injury from stereotactic body radiation therapy. Transl Oncol. 2021; 14(1):100950. PMC: 7744766. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100950. View

2.
Culleton S, Jiang H, Haddad C, Kim J, Brierley J, Brade A . Outcomes following definitive stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with Child-Pugh B or C hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2014; 111(3):412-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.05.002. View

3.
Mathew A, Atenafu E, Owen D, Maurino C, Brade A, Brierley J . Long term outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma without macrovascular invasion. Eur J Cancer. 2020; 134:41-51. PMC: 7340168. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.024. View

4.
Murray L, Dawson L . Advances in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2017; 27(3):247-255. DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.02.002. View

5.
Feng M, Suresh K, Schipper M, Bazzi L, Ben-Josef E, Matuszak M . Individualized Adaptive Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Liver Tumors in Patients at High Risk for Liver Damage: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 4(1):40-47. PMC: 5766368. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2303. View