» Articles » PMID: 33877548

Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM Tests Using an Automated Chemiluminescent Assay

Overview
Journal Curr Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Apr 20
PMID 33877548
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Serology tests for viral antibodies provide an important tool to support nucleic acid testing for diagnosis of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is useful for documenting previous exposures to SARS-CoV-2, the etiological agent of COVID-19. The sensitivities of the chemiluminescent SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM immunoassay were assessed by using serum samples collected from 728 patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The specificity was evaluated on a panel of 60 serum samples from non-COVID-19 patients with high levels of rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody, or antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), mycoplasma pneumonia, human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus, influenza A or influenza B. The imprecision and interference were assessed by adopting the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP15-A2 and EP7-A2, respectively. Sensitivities between 1 and 65 days after onset of symptoms were 94.4% and 78.7%, for IgG and IgM test, respectively. The sensitivity increased with the time after symptom onset, and rose to the top on the 22nd to 28th days. The total imprecision (CVs) was less than 6.0% for IgG and less than 6.5% for IgM. Limited cross-reactions with antibodies against EBV, CMV, mycoplasma pneumonia, human RSV, adenovirus, influenza A or influenza B were found. These data suggested the chemiluminescent SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM, assay with reliable utility and sensitivity, could be used for rapid screening and retrospective surveillance of COVID-19.

Citing Articles

Post COVID-19 joint pain: Preliminary report of the relationship with antinuclear antibodies and inflammation.

Tamariz L, Bast E, Abad M, Klimas N, Caralis P, Palacio A J Med Virol. 2022; 94(8):3479-3481.

PMID: 35355291 PMC: 9088578. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27753.


Dynamic changes of IgM and IgG antibodies in asymptomatic patients as an effective way to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Li P, Shen G, Zhu Z, Shi S, Hu Y, Zeng Z J Clin Lab Anal. 2021; 36(1):e24080.

PMID: 34914135 PMC: 8761420. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24080.


Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 Capture IgM Antibody Assay in Convalescent Sera.

Ha B, Jadhao S, Hussaini L, Gibson T, Stephens K, Salazar L Microbiol Spectr. 2021; 9(2):e0045821.

PMID: 34494855 PMC: 8557898. DOI: 10.1128/Spectrum.00458-21.

References
1.
Woo P, Lau S, Wong B, Tsoi H, Fung A, Kao R . Differential sensitivities of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus spike polypeptide enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and SARS coronavirus nucleocapsid protein ELISA for serodiagnosis of SARS coronavirus pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(7):3054-8. PMC: 1169156. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.7.3054-3058.2005. View

2.
Hsueh P, Huang L, Chen P, Kao C, Yang P . Chronological evolution of IgM, IgA, IgG and neutralisation antibodies after infection with SARS-associated coronavirus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004; 10(12):1062-6. PMC: 7129952. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01009.x. View

3.
Peiris J, Chu C, Cheng V, Chan K, Hung I, Poon L . Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: a prospective study. Lancet. 2003; 361(9371):1767-72. PMC: 7112410. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13412-5. View

4.
Kroll M . Evaluating interference caused by lipemia. Clin Chem. 2004; 50(11):1968-9. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.038075. View

5.
Hsueh P, Kao C, Lee C, Chen L, Ho M, Sia C . SARS antibody test for serosurveillance. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004; 10(9):1558-62. PMC: 3320307. DOI: 10.3201/eid1009.040101. View