» Articles » PMID: 33875899

Pyrolysis Kinetic Behaviour and TG-FTIR-GC-MS Analysis of Coronavirus Face Masks

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2021 Apr 20
PMID 33875899
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the times of Covid-19, face masks are considered to be the main source of protection against the virus that reduces its spread. These masks are classified as single-use medical products with a very short service life, estimated at few days, hence millions of contaminated masks are generated daily in the form of hazardous materials, what requires to develop a safe method to dispose of them, especially since some of them are loaded with viruses. 3-ply face masks (3PFM) represent the major fraction of this waste and are composed mainly from polypropylene and melt blown filter with high content of volatile substances (96.6 wt.%), what makes pyrolysis treatment an emerging technology that could be used to dispose of face masks and convert them into energy products. In this context, this work aims to study pyrolysis kinetic behaviour and TG-FTIR-GC-MS analysis of 3PFM. The research started with analysis of 3PFM using elemental analysis, proximate analysis, and compositional analyses. Afterwards, TG-FTIR system was used to study the thermal and chemical decomposition of 3PFM analyzed at different heating rates: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 °C/min. The GC/MS system was used to observe the synthesized volatile products at the maximum decomposition temperatures. After that, isoconversional methods, the advanced nonlinear integral isoconversional method, and the iterative linear integral isoconversional method were used to determine the activation energies of mask pyrolysis, while the distributed activation energy model and the independent parallel reactions kinetic model were used to fit TGA and DTG curves with deviations below <1. The TGA-DTG results showed that 3PFM can decompose in three different periods with a total weight loss of 95 % and maximum decomposition in the range 405-510 °C, while the FTIR spectra and GC-MS analysis exhibited that - C-H (aromatic and aliphatic) and 2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene (28-43 % based on heating rate) represented the major compounds in the released volatile components. Finally, Vyazovkin and the iterative linear integral isoconversional methods gave activation energies almost similar to that obtained by the KAS isoconversional method.

Citing Articles

Plastic Devolatilisation Kinetics During Isothermal High-Temperature Pyrolysis: Focus on Solid Products (Part I).

Kiminaite I, Wilhelm S, Martetschlager L, Eckert C, Berenguer Casco M, Striugas N Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40006187 PMC: 11859507. DOI: 10.3390/polym17040525.


Pyrolysis Kinetic Behavior and Thermodynamic Analysis of PET Nonwoven Fabric.

Yousef S, Eimontas J, Striugas N, Mohamed A, Ali Abdelnaby M Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(18).

PMID: 37763357 PMC: 10532786. DOI: 10.3390/ma16186079.


Co-pyrolysis of medical protective clothing and oil palm wastes for biofuel: Experimental, techno-economic, and environmental analyses.

Su G, Zulkifli N, Ong H, Ibrahim S, Cheah M, Zhu R Energy (Oxf). 2023; 273:127221.

PMID: 36942281 PMC: 10014877. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127221.


Thermal degradation model of used surgical masks based on machine learning methodology.

Chaudhary A, Kiran B, Sivagami K, Govindarajan D, Chakraborty S J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2023; 144:104732.

PMID: 36817942 PMC: 9922155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2023.104732.


Masks thermal degradation as an alternative of waste valorization on the COVID-19 pandemic: A kinetic study.

Montero-Calderon C, Tacuri R, Solis H, De-La-Rosa A, Gordillo G, Araujo-Granda P Heliyon. 2023; 9(2):e13518.

PMID: 36785832 PMC: 9907787. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13518.


References
1.
Wang J, Pan L, Tang S, Ji J, Shi X . Mask use during COVID-19: A risk adjusted strategy. Environ Pollut. 2020; 266(Pt 1):115099. PMC: 7314683. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115099. View

2.
Aragaw T . Surgical face masks as a potential source for microplastic pollution in the COVID-19 scenario. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020; 159:111517. PMC: 7381927. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111517. View

3.
Zhu H, Yan J, Jiang X, Lai Y, Cen K . Study on pyrolysis of typical medical waste materials by using TG-FTIR analysis. J Hazard Mater. 2007; 153(1-2):670-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.011. View

4.
Li J, Wang H, Geng C, Liu Z, Lin Y, Nie J . Suboptimal declines and delays in early breast cancer treatment after COVID-19 quarantine restrictions in China: A national survey of 8397 patients in the first quarter of 2020. EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 26:100503. PMC: 7511845. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100503. View

5.
Tripathi A, Tyagi V, Vivekanand V, Bose P, Suthar S . Challenges, opportunities and progress in solid waste management during COVID-19 pandemic. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng. 2024; 2:100060. PMC: 7686759. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100060. View