Understanding Patient Needs and Gaps in Radiology Reports Through Online Discussion Forum Analysis

Overview

Journal Insights Imaging

Publisher Springer

Specialty Radiology

Date 2021 Apr 19

PMID 33871753

Citations 9

Authors

Mohammad Alarifi

Timothy Patrick

Abdulrahman Jabour

Min Wu

Jake Luo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Our objective is to investigate patient needs and understand information gaps in radiology reports using patient questions that were posted on online discussion forums. We leveraged online question and answer platforms to collect questions posted by patients to understand current gaps and patient needs. We retrieved six hundred fifty-nine (659) questions using the following sites: Yahoo Answers, Reddit.com, Quora, and Wiki Answers. The questions retrieved were analyzed and the major themes and topics were identified. The questions retrieved were classified into eight major themes. The themes were related to the following topics: radiology report, safety, price, preparation, procedure, meaning, medical staff, and patient portal. Among the 659 questions, 35.50% were concerned with the radiology report. The most common question topics in the radiology report focused on patient understanding of the radiology report (62 of 234 [26.49%]), image visualization (53 of 234 [22.64%]), and report representation (46 of 234 [19.65%]). We also found that most patients were concerned about understanding the MRI report (32%; n = 143) compared with the other imaging modalities (n = 434). Using online discussion forums, we discussed major unmet patient needs and information gaps in radiology reports. These issues could be improved to enhance radiology design in the future.

Citing Articles

Optimizing patient understanding of spine MRI reports using AI: A prospective single center study.

Encalada S, Gupta S, Hunt C, Eldrige J, Evans 2nd J, Mosquera-Moscoso J Interv Pain Med. 2025; 4(1):100550.

PMID: 40051774 PMC: 11883401. DOI: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100550.

American College of Veterinary Radiology and European College of Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging consensus statement on imaging report foundations.

Scrivani P, Watson E, Joostens Z, Yanchik A, Specchi S, Skogmo H Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2024; 66(1):e13471.

PMID: 39681983 PMC: 11649853. DOI: 10.1111/vru.13471.

Generating colloquial radiology reports with large language models.

Tang C, Nagesh S, Fussell D, Glavis-Bloom J, Mishra N, Li C J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024; 31(11):2660-2667.

PMID: 39178375 PMC: 11491646. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae223.

Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare: A Journey through History, Present Innovations, and Future Possibilities.

Hirani R, Noruzi K, Khuram H, Hussaini A, Aifuwa E, Ely K Life (Basel). 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38792579 PMC: 11122160. DOI: 10.3390/life14050557.

Characterization of COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial discussions on the social question-and-answer site Quora.

Xu Q, McMann T, Li J, Wenzel C, Mackey T Trials. 2023; 24(1):790.

PMID: 38053216 PMC: 10696860. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07837-5.

References

Hayashi D, Guermazi A . Taking a proactive role in patient management of important incidental imaging findings: How can we increase the 'value' of diagnostic radiology service and improve quality of patient care?. Jpn J Radiol. 2018; 36(10):579-580. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-018-0766-8. View

Gunderman R, Baskin M, Brown B . When a report is both more and less than a report. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014; 12(5):493-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.006. View

Alarifi M, Patrick T, Jabour A, Wu M, Luo J . Full Radiology Report through Patient Web Portal: A Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(10). PMC: 7277373. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103673. View

Smith J, BERLIN L . Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) and the loss of patient examination records. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 176(6):1381-4. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.176.6.1761381. View

Doshi A, Somberg M, Rosenkrantz A . Factors Influencing Patients' Perspectives of Radiology Imaging Centers: Evaluation Using an Online Social Media Ratings Website. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015; 13(2):210-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.08.020. View

Park M, He Z, Chen Z, Oh S, Bian J . Consumers' Use of UMLS Concepts on Social Media: Diabetes-Related Textual Data Analysis in Blog and Social Q&A Sites. JMIR Med Inform. 2016; 4(4):e41. PMC: 5146325. DOI: 10.2196/medinform.5748. View

Househ M, Borycki E, Kushniruk A . Empowering patients through social media: the benefits and challenges. Health Informatics J. 2014; 20(1):50-8. DOI: 10.1177/1460458213476969. View

Lee K, Kwon H, Lee B, Lee G, Lee J, Park Y . Effect of self-monitoring on long-term patient engagement with mobile health applications. PLoS One. 2018; 13(7):e0201166. PMC: 6062090. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201166. View

Rosenkrantz A . Differences in Perceptions Among Radiologists, Referring Physicians, and Patients Regarding Language for Incidental Findings Reporting. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 208(1):140-143. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.16633. View

10.

Johnson A, Easterling D, Williams L, Glover S, Frankel R . Insight from patients for radiologists: improving our reporting systems. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009; 6(11):786-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.07.010. View

11.

Vaughan Sarrazin M, Cram P, Mazur A, Ward M, Reisinger H . Patient perspectives of dabigatran: analysis of online discussion forums. Patient. 2013; 7(1):47-54. PMC: 5029125. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-013-0027-y. View

12.

Henshaw D, Okawa G, Ching K, Garrido T, Qian H, Tsai J . Access to Radiology Reports via an Online Patient Portal: Experiences of Referring Physicians and Patients. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015; 12(6):582-6.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.01.015. View

13.

Lee K, Hoti K, Hughes J, Emmerton L . Dr Google and the consumer: a qualitative study exploring the navigational needs and online health information-seeking behaviors of consumers with chronic health conditions. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(12):e262. PMC: 4275480. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3706. View

14.

Carman K, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C . Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32(2):223-31. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133. View

15.

Gray B, Gunderman R . Constricting the Radiologic Lexicon: An Orwellian Errand?. Acad Radiol. 2018; 26(2):300-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.005. View

16.

Tachakra S, Potts D, Idowu A . Evaluation of a computerised system for medical records in an accident and emergency department. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1990; 7(3):187-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF02915584. View

17.

Cukor D, Cohen L, Cope E, Ghahramani N, Hedayati S, Hynes D . Patient and Other Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Funded Studies of Patients with Kidney Diseases. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 11(9):1703-1712. PMC: 5012486. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.09780915. View

18.

Miller P, Gunderman R, Lightburn J, Miller D . Enhancing patients' experiences in radiology: through patient-radiologist interaction. Acad Radiol. 2013; 20(6):778-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.12.015. View

19.

Martin-Carreras T, Kahn Jr C . Coverage and Readability of Information Resources to Help Patients Understand Radiology Reports. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018; 15(12):1681-1686. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.019. View

20.

Sprague Martinez L, Carolan K, ODonnell A, Diaz Y, Freeman E . Community engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: Benefits, barriers, and measurement. J Clin Transl Sci. 2019; 2(6):371-376. PMC: 6676439. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2018.341. View