» Articles » PMID: 33870112

Clinicopathological Features of Breast Cancer with Polysomy 17 and Its Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Overview
Date 2021 Apr 19
PMID 33870112
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The interpretation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 () fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results may be challenging in tumors with polysomy 17, which is defined as increased signals of chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17). The effect of polysomy 17 on protein expression and tumor treatment response has not been established. In this retrospective study, we investigated the clinicopathological features of breast cancer with polysomy 17 and determined the tumors' response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Materials And Methods: The study included 366 patients with primary breast cancer whose tumors had a CEP17 count of ≥ three/nucleus based on FISH studies. These cases were categorized according to /CEP17 ratio and signals/nucleus using the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and tumor response to NACT among different groups.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference in patients' age at diagnosis, tumor pathological grade, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and NACT response among different FISH groups. Polysomy 17 tumors in group 1 had a higher rate of response (pathological complete response and residual cancer burden class I) to NACT containing anti- reagent than did those in other groups (p = 0.004), whereas polysomy 17 tumors in group 3 did not show a significant response to anti- treatment.

Conclusion: Polysomy 17 tumors in different FISH groups have different pathological features and respond to NACT differently. These results may help us identify patients who will benefit from anti- therapy.

Citing Articles

In situ HER2 RNA expression as a predictor of pathologic complete response of HER2-positive breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-HER2 targeted treatment.

Lien H, Lo C, Lee Y, Lin P, Wang M, Kuo W Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 26(1):100.

PMID: 38867307 PMC: 11170871. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01852-3.


HER2 copy number determination in breast cancer using the highly sensitive droplet digital PCR method.

Alinger-Scharinger B, Kronberger C, Hutarew G, Hitzl W, Reitsamer R, Frederike K Virchows Arch. 2023; 485(1):53-62.

PMID: 37996704 PMC: 11271376. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03706-3.


Standardized pathology report for HER2 testing in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer.

Ivanova M, Porta F, DErcole M, Pescia C, Sajjadi E, Cursano G Virchows Arch. 2023; 484(1):3-14.

PMID: 37770765 PMC: 10791807. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03656-w.


HER2 Amplification in p53-Mutated Endometrial Carcinomas.

Balestra A, Larsimont D, Noel J Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(5).

PMID: 36900227 PMC: 10001224. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051435.


Validation of HER2 Status in Whole Genome Sequencing Data of Breast Cancers with the Ploidy-Corrected Copy Number Approach.

Wojtaszewska M, Stepien R, Wozna A, Piernik M, Sztromwasser P, Dabrowski M Mol Diagn Ther. 2021; 26(1):105-116.

PMID: 34932189 PMC: 8766398. DOI: 10.1007/s40291-021-00571-1.

References
1.
Sneige N, Hess K, Multani A, Gong Y, Ibrahim N . Prognostic significance of equivocal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 results and clinical utility of alternative chromosome 17 genes in patients with invasive breast cancer: A cohort study. Cancer. 2016; 123(7):1115-1123. PMC: 5372352. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30460. View

2.
Vanden Bempt I, Van Loo P, Drijkoningen M, Neven P, Smeets A, Christiaens M . Polysomy 17 in breast cancer: clinicopathologic significance and impact on HER-2 testing. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(30):4869-74. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4296. View

3.
Wolff A, Hammond M, Allison K, Harvey B, Mangu P, Bartlett J . Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(20):2105-2122. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8738. View

4.
Petroni S, Addati T, Mattioli E, Caponio M, Quero C, Rubini V . Centromere 17 copy number alteration: negative prognostic factor in invasive breast cancer?. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012; 136(9):993-1000. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0327-OA. View

5.
Vogel C, Cobleigh M, Tripathy D, Gutheil J, Harris L, Fehrenbacher L . Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(3):719-26. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.719. View