» Articles » PMID: 33868712

Not So Clonal Asexuals: Unraveling the Secret Sex Life of

Overview
Journal Evol Lett
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Apr 19
PMID 33868712
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The maintenance of sex is paradoxical as sexual species pay the "twofold cost of males" and should thus quickly be replaced by asexual mutants reproducing clonally. However, asexuals may not be strictly clonal and engage in "cryptic sex," challenging this simple scenario. We study the cryptic sex life of the brine shrimp , which has once been termed an "ancient asexual" and where no genetic differences have ever been observed between parents and offspring. This asexual species rarely produces males, which can hybridize with sexual females of closely related species and transmit asexuality to their offspring. Using such hybrids, we show that recombination occurs in asexual lineages, causing loss-of-heterozygosity and parent-offspring differences. These differences cannot generally be observed in field-sampled asexuals because once heterozygosity is lost, subsequent recombination leaves no footprint. Furthermore, using extensive paternity tests, we show that hybrid females can reproduce both sexually and asexually, and transmit asexuality to both sexually and asexually produced offspring in a dominant fashion. Finally, we show that, contrary to previous reports, field-sampled asexual females also rarely reproduce sexually (rate ∼2‰). Overall, most previously known facts about asexuality turned out to be erroneous. More generally, our findings suggest that the evidence for strictly clonal reproduction of asexual species needs to be reconsidered, and that rare sex and consequences of nonclonal asexuality, such as gene flow within asexuals, need to be more widely taken into account in more realistic models for the maintenance of sex and the persistence of asexual lineages.

Citing Articles

Lack of successful sexual reproduction suggests the irreversible parthenogenesis in a stick insect.

Nozaki T, Chikami Y, Yano K, Sato R, Suetsugu K, Kaneko S Ecology. 2025; 106(1):e4522.

PMID: 39888009 PMC: 11779601. DOI: 10.1002/ecy.4522.


Parthenogenetic Stick Insects Exhibit Signatures of Preservation in the Molecular Architecture of Male Reproduction.

Forni G, Mantovani B, Mikheyev A, Luchetti A Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(5).

PMID: 38573594 PMC: 11108686. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae073.


Spatio-temporal patterns of ovarian development and gene silencing reduced fecundity in parthenogenetic .

Duan H, Shao X, Liu W, Xiang J, Pan N, Wang X Open Biol. 2023; 13(11):230172.

PMID: 37963545 PMC: 10645507. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.230172.


Evidence for cryptic sex in parthenogenetic stick insects of the genus .

Freitas S, Parker D, Labedan M, Dumas Z, Schwander T Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2007):20230404.

PMID: 37727092 PMC: 10509586. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0404.


Evolutionary Potential of Parthenogenesis-Bisexual Lineages within Triploid Apomictic Thelytoky in (Flor, 1861) (Hemiptera, Psylloidea) in Fennoscandia.

Nokkala S, Kuznetsova V, Pietarinen P, Nokkala C Insects. 2022; 13(12).

PMID: 36555050 PMC: 9781518. DOI: 10.3390/insects13121140.


References
1.
Engelstadter J . Asexual but Not Clonal: Evolutionary Processes in Automictic Populations. Genetics. 2017; 206(2):993-1009. PMC: 5499200. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.196873. View

2.
Liu H, Huang J, Sun X, Li J, Hu Y, Yu L . Tetrad analysis in plants and fungi finds large differences in gene conversion rates but no GC bias. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017; 2(1):164-173. PMC: 5733138. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0372-7. View

3.
Burt A . Perspective: sex, recombination, and the efficacy of selection--was Weismann right?. Evolution. 2000; 54(2):337-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00038.x. View

4.
Nougue O, Rode N, Jabbour-Zahab R, Segard A, Chevin L, Haag C . Automixis in Artemia: solving a century-old controversy. J Evol Biol. 2015; 28(12):2337-48. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12757. View

5.
Paland S, Colbourne J, Lynch M . Evolutionary history of contagious asexuality in Daphnia pulex. Evolution. 2005; 59(4):800-13. View