» Articles » PMID: 33866309

Comprehensive Analysis of Multiple Cohort Datasets Deciphers the Utility of Germline Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Apr 18
PMID 33866309
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prostate cancer susceptibility is a polygenic trait. We aimed to examine the controversial diagnostic utility of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) for prostate cancer. We analyzed two datasets collected from Europeans and one from Africans. These datasets were generated by the genome-wide association studies, that is, CGEMS, BPC3, and MEC-Africans, respectively. About 540,000 SNPs, including 61 risk markers that constitute a panel termed MK-61, were commonly genotyped. For each dataset, we augmented the MK-61 panel to generate an MK-61 one by adding several thousands of SNPs that were moderately associated with prostate cancer occurrence in external dataset(s). We assessed the diagnostic utility of both panels by measuring their predictive strength for prostate cancer occurrence with AUC statistics. We calculated the theoretical AUCs using quantitative genetics model-based formulae and obtained the empirical estimates via 10-fold cross-validation using statistical and machine learning techniques. For the MK-61 panel, the 95% confidence intervals of the theoretical AUCs (AUC-CI.95) were 0.578-0.655, 0.596-0.656, and 0.539-0.596 in the CGEMS, BPC3, and MEC-Africans cohorts, respectively. For the MK-61 panels, the corresponding AUC-CI.95 were 0.617-0.663, 0.527-0.736, and 0.547-0.565. The empirical AUCs largely fell within the theoretical interval. A promising result (AUC = 0.703, FNR = 0.354, FPR = 0.353) was obtained in the BPC3 cohort when the MK-61 panel was used. In the CGEMS cohort, the MK-61 panel complemented PSA in predicting the disease status of PSA ≥ 2.0 ng/mL samples. This study demonstrates that augmented risk SNP panels can enhance prostate cancer prediction for males of European ancestry, especially those with [Formula: see text]ng/mL. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that augmented risk SNP panels can enhance prostate cancer prediction for males of European ancestry, especially those with PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL.

Citing Articles

Understanding the Biological Basis of Polygenic Risk Scores and Disparities in Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Genomic Analysis.

Zhang W, Zhang K Cancer Inform. 2024; 23():11769351241276319.

PMID: 39444678 PMC: 11497523. DOI: 10.1177/11769351241276319.


Quantifying the Contributions of Environmental Factors to Prostate Cancer and Detecting Risk-Related Diet Metrics and Racial Disparities.

Zhang W, Zhang K Cancer Inform. 2023; 22:11769351231168006.

PMID: 37139178 PMC: 10150431. DOI: 10.1177/11769351231168006.


Deciphering the Polygenic Basis of Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer By an Integrative Analysis of Genomic and Transcriptomic Data.

Zhang W, Nicholson T, Zhang K Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021; 15(3):161-171.

PMID: 34965922 PMC: 8929532. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0406.

References
1.
Shenoy D, Packianathan S, Chen A, Vijayakumar S . Do African-American men need separate prostate cancer screening guidelines?. BMC Urol. 2016; 16(1):19. PMC: 4862049. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-016-0137-7. View

2.
Filella X, Fernandez-Galan E, Fernandez Bonifacio R, Foj L . Emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2018; 11:83-94. PMC: 5961643. DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S136026. View

3.
Dudbridge F . Power and predictive accuracy of polygenic risk scores. PLoS Genet. 2013; 9(3):e1003348. PMC: 3605113. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003348. View

4.
Benafif S, Kote-Jarai Z, Eeles R . A Review of Prostate Cancer Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018; 27(8):845-857. PMC: 6051932. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-1046. View

5.
Yeager M, Orr N, Hayes R, Jacobs K, Kraft P, Wacholder S . Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer identifies a second risk locus at 8q24. Nat Genet. 2007; 39(5):645-9. DOI: 10.1038/ng2022. View