» Articles » PMID: 33865750

Birth Intentions Among US Fathers with Disabilities

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2021 Apr 18
PMID 33865750
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Men's birth intention is an indicator of their sexual health and plays an important role for their child's health and development; however, birth intendedness in fathers with disabilities has been unknown.

Objective: This study examines disparities in birth intendedness among fathers with and without disabilities and explores whether the differences vary by marital status or race/ethnicity.

Methods: Data from the 2011-2017 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) were used to examine pregnancy intendedness for fathers with (n = 380) and without disabilities (n = 1,324) about their last birth in the five years preceding the interview. Multinomial regression models estimated the odds ratios of fathers' disability status on birth intention controlling for covariates. Interaction effects of disability status by marital status or race/ethnicity were also tested.

Results: Fathers with disabilities were 1.89 (95% CI = 1.21, 2.95) times as likely to report their last birth as unwanted versus intended compared to those without disabilities after adjusting for covariates. Although married fathers without disabilities were less likely to report unintended birth than their unmarried counterparts, the protective effect of marriage was not evident among fathers with disabilities.

Conclusions: Disabled fathers are at a higher risk of unintended birth compared to nondisabled fathers. These findings highlight the need to increase access to family planning services for disabled men. Further research is needed to better understand the risk factors that contribute to disabled fathers' unintended birth and how these are linked to their child and family well-being.

Citing Articles

Pregnancy intention, preconception health, health behaviours, and information and health advice seeking among expectant male partners.

Carter T, Schoenaker D, Adams J, Steel A BMC Prim Care. 2025; 26(1):36.

PMID: 39939932 PMC: 11817563. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-025-02703-6.


Socioeconomic Characteristics, Lifestyle Behaviors, and Health Conditions Among Males of Reproductive Age With and Without Disabilities, NHANES 2013-2018.

Deierlein A, Sun Y, Prado G, Stein C Am J Mens Health. 2023; 17(4):15579883221138190.

PMID: 37462134 PMC: 10357054. DOI: 10.1177/15579883221138190.

References
1.
Horner-Johnson W, Biel F, Caughey A, Darney B . Differences in Prenatal Care by Presence and Type of Maternal Disability. Am J Prev Med. 2019; 56(3):376-382. PMC: 6402767. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.021. View

2.
Kim T, Dagher R, Chen J . Racial/Ethnic Differences in Unintended Pregnancy: Evidence From a National Sample of U.S. Women. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 50(4):427-435. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.027. View

3.
Finer L, Zolna M . Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. 2011; 84(5):478-85. PMC: 3338192. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013. View

4.
Clinton J, Kelber S . Stress and coping in fathers of newborns: comparisons of planned versus unplanned pregnancy. Int J Nurs Stud. 1993; 30(5):437-43. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7489(93)90053-w. View

5.
Beets M, Foley J . Association of father involvement and neighborhood quality with kindergartners' physical activity: a multilevel structural equation model. Am J Health Promot. 2008; 22(3):195-203. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.22.3.195. View