» Articles » PMID: 33863315

Comparing the Characteristics and Predicting the Survival of Patients with Head and Neck Melanoma Versus Body Melanoma: a Population-based Study

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Apr 17
PMID 33863315
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous studies reported cutaneous melanoma in head and neck (HNM) differed from those in other regions (body melanoma, BM). Individualized tools to predict the survival of patients with HNM or BM remain insufficient. We aimed at comparing the characteristics of HNM and BM, developing and validating nomograms for predicting the survival of patients with HNM or BM.

Methods: The information of patients with HNM or BM from 2004 to 2015 was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The HNM group and BM group were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. We used the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox models to identify independent prognostic factors. Nomograms were developed via the rms and dynnom packages, and were measured by the concordance index (C-index), the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration plots.

Results: Of 70,605 patients acquired, 21% had HNM and 79% had BM. The HNM group contained more older patients, male sex and lentigo maligna melanoma, and more frequently had thicker tumors and metastases than the BM group. The 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 88.1 ± 0.3% and 74.4 ± 0.4% in the HNM group and 92.5 ± 0.1% and 85.8 ± 0.2% in the BM group, respectively. Eight variables (age, sex, histology, thickness, ulceration, stage, metastases, and surgery) were identified to construct nomograms of CSS and OS for patients with HNM or BM. Additionally, four dynamic nomograms were available on web. The internal and external validation of each nomogram showed high C-index values (0.785-0.896) and AUC values (0.81-0.925), and the calibration plots showed great consistency.

Conclusions: The characteristics of HNM and BM are heterogeneous. We constructed and validated four nomograms for predicting the 3-, 5- and 10-year CSS and OS probabilities of patients with HNM or BM. These nomograms can serve as practical clinical tools for survival prediction and individual health management.

Citing Articles

Dermoscopy Training Course Improves Ophthalmologists' Accuracy in Diagnosing Atypical Pigmented Periorbital Skin Lesions.

Rubegni G, Cartocci A, Tognetti L, Orione M, Gagliano C, Bacci T Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(22).

PMID: 39594236 PMC: 11593280. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14222571.


Comparative study of cutaneous malignant melanoma according to anatomical site: plantar versus non-plantar melanoma.

Hali F, Bousmara R, Mellouki A, Kerouach A, Marnissi F, Diouri M Arch Dermatol Res. 2024; 317(1):35.

PMID: 39565418 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-024-03523-x.


Associations Between Cutaneous Melanoma Traits and the Likelihood of Metastasis.

Butrimas G, Cibulskaite R, Janonyte U, Silickyte R Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65754.

PMID: 39211683 PMC: 11361285. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65754.


Risk prediction and treatment assessment in glioma patients using SEER database: a prospective observational study.

Li X, Shao Y, Wang Z, Zhu J BMJ Open. 2023; 13(12):e079341.

PMID: 38070919 PMC: 10729083. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079341.


The Impact of Clinical and Histopathological Factors on Disease Progression and Survival in Thick Cutaneous Melanomas.

Tapoi D, Derewicz D, Gheorghisan-Galateanu A, Dumitru A, Ciongariu A, Costache M Biomedicines. 2023; 11(10).

PMID: 37892990 PMC: 10604442. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11102616.


References
1.
Lachiewicz A, Berwick M, Wiggins C, Thomas N . Survival differences between patients with scalp or neck melanoma and those with melanoma of other sites in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Arch Dermatol. 2008; 144(4):515-21. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.144.4.515. View

2.
Callender G, Egger M, Burton A, Scoggins C, Ross M, Stromberg A . Prognostic implications of anatomic location of primary cutaneous melanoma of 1 mm or thicker. Am J Surg. 2011; 202(6):659-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.048. View

3.
Gulati M, Black H, Shaw L, Arnsdorf M, Merz C, Lauer M . The prognostic value of a nomogram for exercise capacity in women. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353(5):468-75. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa044154. View

4.
Schadendorf D, van Akkooi A, Berking C, Griewank K, Gutzmer R, Hauschild A . Melanoma. Lancet. 2018; 392(10151):971-984. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31559-9. View

5.
Xiao Y, Peng S, Hu Y, Zhang J, Cao X . Development and validation of prognostic nomogram in patients with nonmetastatic malignant melanoma: a SEER population-based study. Cancer Med. 2020; 9(22):8562-8570. PMC: 7666721. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3318. View