Peer Influence in Adolescent Drinking Behavior: A Meta-analysis of Stochastic Actor-based Modeling Studies

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2021 Apr 16

PMID 33861781

Citations 11

Authors

Valeria Ivaniushina

Vera Titkova

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To measure the effects of peer influence and peer selection on drinking behavior in adolescence through a rigorous statistical approach designed to unravel these interrelated processes.

Methods: We conducted systematic searches of electronic databases, thesis collections and conference proceedings to identify studies that used longitudinal network design and stochastic actor-oriented modeling to analyze drinking behavior in adolescents. Parameter estimates collected from individual studies were analyzed using multilevel random-effects models.

Results: We identified 26 articles eligible for meta-analysis. Meta-analyses for different specifications of the peer influence effect were conducted separately. The peer influence effect was positive for every specification: for average similarity (avSim) mean log odds ratio was 1.27 with 95% confidence interval [0.04; 2.49]; for total similarity (totSim) 0.46 (95% CI = [0.44; 0.48]), and for average alter (avAlt) 0.70 (95% CI = [-0.01; 1.41]). The peer selection effect (simX) was also positive: 0.46 (95% CI = [0.28; 0.63]). Conversion log odds ratio values to Cohen's d gives estimates from 0.25 to 0.70, which is considered as medium to large effect.

Conclusions: Advances in methodology for social network analysis have made it possible to accurately estimate peer influence effects free from peer selection effects. More research is necessary to clarify the roles of age, gender, and individual susceptibility on the changing behavior of adolescents under the influence of their peers. Understanding the effects of peer influence should inform practitioners and policy makers to design and deliver more effective prevention programs.

Citing Articles

Decreasing brain activity caused by acute administration of ketamine and alcohol - A randomized, controlled, observer-blinded experimental study.

Ferreira L, Padilha da Silveira E, Paz C, Otake Hamoy M, Barbosa G, Santos M Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1456009.

PMID: 39478968 PMC: 11521905. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1456009.

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Associations with Mental Health, Substance Use, and Violence Perpetration among Young Adults in sub-Saharan Africa.

Brown C, Nkemjika S, Ratto J, Dube S, Gilbert L, Chiang L Child Abuse Negl. 2024; 150.

PMID: 38854869 PMC: 11160582. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106524.

Environmental enrichment enhances ethanol preference over social reward in male swiss mice: Involvement of oxytocin-dopamine interactions.

Rae M, Gomes I, Spelta L, Bailey A, Marcourakis T, Devi L Neuropharmacology. 2024; 253:109971.

PMID: 38705568 PMC: 11145911. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.109971.

Eviction as a community health exposure.

Schwartz G, Leifheit K, Arcaya M, Keene D Soc Sci Med. 2023; 340:116496.

PMID: 38091853 PMC: 11249083. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116496.

Testing mediating pathways between school segregation and health: Evidence on peer prejudice and health behaviors.

Schwartz G, Chiang A, Wang G, Kim M, White J, Hamad R Soc Sci Med. 2023; 335:116214.

PMID: 37716183 PMC: 11062255. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116214.

References

McMillan C, Felmlee D, Osgood D . Peer Influence, Friend Selection, and Gender: How Network Processes Shape Adolescent Smoking, Drinking, And Delinquency. Soc Networks. 2019; 55:86-96. PMC: 6433147. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2018.05.008. View

Cheadle J, Williams D . The role of drinking in new and existing friendships across high school settings. Health (Irvine Calif). 2015; 5(6A3):18-25. PMC: 4663454. DOI: 10.4236/health.2013.56A3004. View

Ivaniushina V, Titkova V, Alexandrov D . Peer influence in adolescent drinking behaviour: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of stochastic actor-based modeling studies. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(7):e028709. PMC: 6661693. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028709. View

Ali M, Dwyer D . Social network effects in alcohol consumption among adolescents. Addict Behav. 2010; 35(4):337-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.002. View

Steinberg L, Monahan K . Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Dev Psychol. 2007; 43(6):1531-1543. PMC: 2779518. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531. View

Valente T . Putting the network in network interventions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(36):9500-9501. PMC: 5594703. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712473114. View

Mundt M, Mercken L, Zakletskaia L . Peer selection and influence effects on adolescent alcohol use: a stochastic actor-based model. BMC Pediatr. 2012; 12:115. PMC: 3469361. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-115. View

Kiuru N, Burk W, Laursen B, Salmela-Aro K, Nurmi J . Pressure to drink but not to smoke: disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. J Adolesc. 2010; 33(6):801-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.07.006. View

Hingson R, Heeren T, Winter M . Age at drinking onset and alcohol dependence: age at onset, duration, and severity. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006; 160(7):739-46. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.160.7.739. View

10.

Allen J, Chango J, Szwedo D, Schad M, Marston E . Predictors of susceptibility to peer influence regarding substance use in adolescence. Child Dev. 2011; 83(1):337-50. PMC: 3390749. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01682.x. View

11.

Urberg K, Luo Q, Pilgrim C, Degirmencioglu S . A two-stage model of peer influence in adolescent substance use: individual and relationship-specific differences in susceptibility to influence. Addict Behav. 2003; 28(7):1243-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(02)00256-3. View

12.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

13.

Becker S, Curry J . Testing the effects of peer socialization versus selection on alcohol and marijuana use among treated adolescents. Subst Use Misuse. 2013; 49(3):234-42. PMC: 4075433. DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2013.824479. View

14.

Osgood D, Feinberg M, Ragan D . Social Networks and the Diffusion of Adolescent Problem Behavior: Reliable Estimates of Selection and Influence from Sixth Through Ninth Grades. Prev Sci. 2015; 16(6):832-43. PMC: 4498961. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-015-0558-7. View

15.

Wang C, Hipp J, Butts C, Jose R, Lakon C . Alcohol use among adolescent youth: the role of friendship networks and family factors in multiple school studies. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0119965. PMC: 4355410. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119965. View

16.

Clark A, Loheac Y . "It wasn't me, it was them!" social influence in risky behavior by adolescents. J Health Econ. 2006; 26(4):763-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.11.005. View

17.

Allen J, Porter M, McFarland F . Leaders and followers in adolescent close friendships: susceptibility to peer influence as a predictor of risky behavior, friendship instability, and depression. Dev Psychopathol. 2006; 18(1):155-72. PMC: 1557636. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579406060093. View

18.

Sumter S, Bokhorst C, Steinberg L, Westenberg P . The developmental pattern of resistance to peer influence in adolescence: will the teenager ever be able to resist?. J Adolesc. 2008; 32(4):1009-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.08.010. View

19.

Wang C, Hipp J, Butts C, Lakon C . The interdependence of cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use in the context of school-based social networks. PLoS One. 2018; 13(7):e0200904. PMC: 6054419. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200904. View

20.

Borsari B, Carey K . Peer influences on college drinking: a review of the research. J Subst Abuse. 2002; 13(4):391-424. DOI: 10.1016/s0899-3289(01)00098-0. View