» Articles » PMID: 33858405

What Does the Patient Have to Say? Valuing the Patient Experience to Improve the Patient Journey

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 Apr 16
PMID 33858405
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patient-reported data-satisfaction, preferences, outcomes and experience-are increasingly studied to provide excellent patient-centred care. In particular, healthcare professionals need to understand whether and how patient experience data can more pertinently inform the design of service delivery from a patient-centred perspective when compared with other indicators. This study aims to explore whether timely patient-reported data could capture relevant issues to improve the hospital patient journey.

Methods: Between January and February 2019, a longitudinal survey was conducted in the orthopaedics department of a 250-bed Italian university hospital with patients admitted for surgery; the aim was to analyse the patient journey from the first outpatient visit to discharge. The same patients completed a paper-and-pencil questionnaire, which was created to collect timely preference, experience and main outcomes data, and the hospital patient satisfaction questionnaire. The first was completed at the time of admission to the hospital and at the end of hospitalisation, and the second questionnaire was completed at the end of hospitalisation.

Results: A total of 254 patients completed the three questionnaires. The results show the specific value of patient-reported data. Greater or less negative satisfaction may not reveal pathology-related needs, but patient experience data can detect important areas of improvement along the hospital journey. As clinical conditions and the context of care change rapidly within a single hospital stay for surgery, collecting data at two different moments of the patient journey enables researchers to capture areas of potential improvement in the patient journey that are linked to the context, clinical conditions and emotions experienced by the patient.

Conclusion: By contributing to the literature on how patient-reported data could be collected and used in hospital quality improvement, this study opens the debate about the use of real-time focused data. Further studies should explore how to use patient-reported data effectively (including what the patient reports are working well) and how to improve hospital processes by profiling patients' needs and defining the appropriate methodologies to capture the experiences of vulnerable patients. These topics may offer new frontiers of research to achieve a patient-centred healthcare system.

Citing Articles

All the voices we cannot hear: a taxonomy of why some populations' experiences are missing from health and care quality evidence and the Toolkit for Assessing Under Representation in User Surveys (TAURUS).

Graham C, King J, Lerway C, Poots A BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e087627.

PMID: 40010825 PMC: 11865794. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087627.


Patient safety in eye care: a multi-method analysis of reported incidents involving implementation of care and clinical assessment in England and Wales.

Acton J, McFadzean J, Lau C, Foo J, Carson-Stevens A Eye (Lond). 2025; .

PMID: 39948402 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03669-6.


Improving the healthcare user experience: an optimization model grounded in patient-centredness.

Peruzzo E, Seghieri C, Vainieri M, De Rosis S BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):132.

PMID: 39849506 PMC: 11761721. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11960-7.


Assessing patients' experience of care in four referral hospitals: a cross-sectional survey of outpatients in two South African rural provinces.

Chitha W, Mnyaka O, Ncinitwa A, Giwu O, Mashao T, Mabophe K BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1566.

PMID: 39696375 PMC: 11654052. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12002-y.


Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of orthopedic operating room personnel regarding the use of pneumatic tourniquets.

Zu G, Zhang Q, Chen G, Yao E, Fei J, Han G PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0307545.

PMID: 39047025 PMC: 11268627. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307545.


References
1.
Brennan P, Strombom I . Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998; 5(3):257-62. PMC: 61299. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050257. View

2.
Pilnick A, Dingwall R . On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: a critical review. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72(8):1374-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.033. View

3.
Klose K, Kreimeier S, Tangermann U, Aumann I, Damm K . Patient- and person-reports on healthcare: preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction - an essay. Health Econ Rev. 2016; 6(1):18. PMC: 4875930. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-016-0094-6. View

4.
Boiko O, Campbell J, Elmore N, Davey A, Roland M, Burt J . The role of patient experience surveys in quality assurance and improvement: a focus group study in English general practice. Health Expect. 2014; 18(6):1982-94. PMC: 5810660. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12298. View

5.
Manary M, Boulding W, Staelin R, Glickman S . The patient experience and health outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2012; 368(3):201-3. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1211775. View