» Articles » PMID: 33854834

Forbidden Links, Trait Matching and Modularity in Plant-hummingbird Networks: Are Specialized Modules Characterized by Higher Phenotypic Floral Integration?

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2021 Apr 15
PMID 33854834
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Plant-pollinator mutualistic networks show non-random structural properties that promote species coexistence. However, these networks show high variability in the interacting species and their connections. Mismatch between plant and pollinator attributes can prevent interactions, while trait matching can enable exclusive access, promoting pollinators' niche partitioning and, ultimately, modularity. Thus, plants belonging to specialized modules should integrate their floral traits to optimize the pollination function. Herein, we aimed to analyze the biological processes involved in the structuring of plant-hummingbird networks by linking network morphological constraints, specialization, modularity and phenotypic floral integration.

Methods: We investigated the understory plant-hummingbird network of two adjacent habitats in the Lacandona rainforest of Mexico, one characterized by lowland rainforest and the other by savanna-like vegetation. We performed monthly censuses to record plant-hummingbird interactions for 2 years (2018-2020). We also took hummingbird bill measurements and floral and nectar measurements. We summarized the interactions in a bipartite matrix and estimated three network descriptors: connectance, complementary specialization (H'), and nestedness. We also analyzed the modularity and average phenotypic floral integration index of each module.

Results: Both habitats showed strong differences in the plant assemblage and network dynamics but were interconnected by the same four hummingbird species, two Hermits and two Emeralds, forming a single network of interaction. The whole network showed low levels of connectance (0.35) and high specialization (H' = 0.87). Flower morphologies ranged from generalized to specialized, but trait matching was an important network structurer. Modularity was associated with morphological specialization. The Hermits and each formed a module by themselves, and a third module was formed by the less-specialized Emeralds: and . The floral integration values were higher in specialized modules but not significantly higher than that formed by generalist species.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that biological processes derived from both trait matching and "forbidden" links, or nonmatched morphological attributes, might be important network drivers in tropical plant-hummingbird systems while morphological specialization plays a minor role in the phenotypic floral integration. The broad variety of corolla and bill shapes promoted niche partitioning, resulting in the modular organization of the assemblage according to morphological specialization. However, more research adding larger datasets of both the number of modules and pollination networks for a wider region is needed to conclude whether phenotypic floral integration increases with morphological specialization in plant-hummingbird systems.

Citing Articles

Species morphology better predicts plant-hummingbird interactions across elevations than nectar traits.

Maglianesi M, Brenes E, Chaves-Elizondo N, Zuniga K, Castro Jimenez A, Barreto E Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2031):20241279.

PMID: 39317323 PMC: 11421924. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1279.


Ego network analysis of the trophic structure of an island land bird through 300 years of climate change and invaders.

Olesen J Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(5):e8916.

PMID: 35600677 PMC: 9121045. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8916.


Pollinator richness, pollination networks, and diet adjustment along local and landscape gradients of resource diversity.

Gomez-Martinez C, Gonzalez-Estevez M, Cursach J, Lazaro A Ecol Appl. 2022; 32(6):e2634.

PMID: 35403772 PMC: 9539497. DOI: 10.1002/eap.2634.

References
1.
Olesen J, Bascompte J, Dupont Y, Jordano P . The modularity of pollination networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(50):19891-6. PMC: 2148393. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706375104. View

2.
Armbruster W, Di Stilio V, Tuxill J, Flores T, Velasquez Runk J . Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine Neotropical plants: a re-evaluation of Berg's correlation-pleiades concept. Am J Bot. 2011; 86(1):39-55. View

3.
Marquez-Luna U, Lara C, Corcuera P, Valverde P . Factors affecting the dominance hierarchy dynamics in a hummingbird assemblage. Curr Zool. 2019; 65(3):261-268. PMC: 6595422. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoy057. View

4.
Smith R, Rausher M . Selection for character displacement is constrained by the genetic architecture of floral traits in the ivyleaf morning glory. Evolution. 2008; 62(11):2829-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00494.x. View

5.
Bluthgen N, Menzel F, Hovestadt T, Fiala B, Bluthgen N . Specialization, constraints, and conflicting interests in mutualistic networks. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(4):341-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.039. View