» Articles » PMID: 33854796

Macular Vascular Density Changes Following Cataract Surgery in Diabetic Patients: An Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study

Overview
Journal J Ophthalmol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2021 Apr 15
PMID 33854796
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Cataracts and diabetes very commonly coexist. The aim of the present study was to quantify the effect of uncomplicated phacoemulsification on retinal microvasculature in diabetic patients by using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

Methods: A prospective observational study of diabetic and nondiabetic patients at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after cataract surgery was performed by using OCTA. We measured the macular thickness (MT), superficial capillary plexus (SCP), deep capillary plexuses (DCP), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in the 3 × 3 mm macular images.

Results: A total of 32 eyes of 32 type 2 diabetic patients and 40 eyes of 40 nondiabetic patients were assessed. There was a significant increase in MT at 1 month and 3 months after surgery in both groups (all < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (=0.217). At 3 months postoperatively, the SCP level in the diabetic group was significantly higher than that at baseline ( < 0.05). The MT and SCP were negatively correlated with logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), while the FAZ area and perimeter were positively correlated with logMAR BCVA in the diabetic group.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that phacoemulsification can increase macular thickness in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients and increase SCP in diabetic patients within 3 months after surgery. Whether these changes persist for a longer period still needs to be investigated.

Citing Articles

Impact of Delayed Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery on Diabetic Macular Edema: A Real-World Study in Northwestern China.

Ren Y, Yan H J Ophthalmol. 2024; 2024:2367292.

PMID: 39070304 PMC: 11281852. DOI: 10.1155/2024/2367292.


Macular changes following cataract surgery in eyes with early diabetic retinopathy: an OCT and OCT angiography study.

Yao H, Yang Z, Cheng Y, Shen X Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1290599.

PMID: 38034528 PMC: 10682095. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1290599.


Microstructural Changes in the Macula Following Cataract Surgery in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Detected Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

Svjascenkova L, Laganovska G, Tzivian L Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 36832094 PMC: 9955711. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040605.


A prospective randomized clinical trial of active-fluidics versus gravity-fluidics system in phacoemulsification for age-related cataract (AGSPC).

Luo Y, Li H, Chen W, Gao Y, Ma T, Ye Z Ann Med. 2022; 54(1):1977-1987.

PMID: 35838186 PMC: 9310653. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2098375.


Long-Term Variations in Retinal Parameters after Uncomplicated Cataract Surgery.

Gawecki M, Pradzynska N, Karska-Basta I J Clin Med. 2022; 11(12).

PMID: 35743496 PMC: 9225292. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123426.


References
1.
Ostri C, Lund-Andersen H, Sander B, La Cour M . Phacoemulsification cataract surgery in a large cohort of diabetes patients: visual acuity outcomes and prognostic factors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37(11):2006-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.030. View

2.
Cheour M, Mazlout H, Falfoul Y, Chakroun I, Marrakchi A, Skhiri M . [Progression of diabetic retinopathy after cataract surgery by phacoemulsification]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2012; 36(1):62-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2012.06.009. View

3.
Moreira Neto C, Moreira Junior C, Ramos Moreira A . Optical coherence tomography in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2015; 78(4):241-5. DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20150062. View

4.
Liao S, Ku W . Progression of diabetic retinopathy after phacoemulsification in diabetic patients: a three-year analysis. Chang Gung Med J. 2004; 26(11):829-34. View

5.
Lee J, Rosen R . Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2016; 16(12):123. DOI: 10.1007/s11892-016-0811-x. View