6.
Folkman J
. Angiogenesis. Annu Rev Med. 2006; 57:1-18.
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131306.
View
7.
Wei J, Luo Y, Fu D
. Early and late outcomes of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as a neoadjuvant treatment in HER2-negative nonmetastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Onco Targets Ther. 2018; 11:9049-9059.
PMC: 6296181.
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S186816.
View
8.
Vaklavas C, Roberts B, Varley K, Lin N, Liu M, Rugo H
. TBCRC 002: a phase II, randomized, open-label trial of preoperative letrozole with or without bevacizumab in postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed stage 2/3 hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2020; 22(1):22.
PMC: 7027068.
DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-01258-x.
View
9.
Conley S, Gheordunescu E, Kakarala P, Newman B, Korkaya H, Heath A
. Antiangiogenic agents increase breast cancer stem cells via the generation of tumor hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(8):2784-9.
PMC: 3286974.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018866109.
View
10.
Jaber M, Song B, Taylor C, Vaske C, Benz S, Rabizadeh S
. A deep learning image-based intrinsic molecular subtype classifier of breast tumors reveals tumor heterogeneity that may affect survival. Breast Cancer Res. 2020; 22(1):12.
PMC: 6988279.
DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-1248-3.
View
11.
Qaseem A, Lin J, Mustafa R, Horwitch C, Wilt T, Forciea M
. Screening for Breast Cancer in Average-Risk Women: A Guidance Statement From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 170(8):547-560.
DOI: 10.7326/M18-2147.
View
12.
Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche P, Ioannidis J
. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000100.
PMC: 2707010.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
View
13.
Toi M, Hoshina S, Takayanagi T, Tominaga T
. Association of vascular endothelial growth factor expression with tumor angiogenesis and with early relapse in primary breast cancer. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1994; 85(10):1045-9.
PMC: 5919354.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1994.tb02904.x.
View
14.
Hanahan D, Folkman J
. Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell. 1996; 86(3):353-64.
DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80108-7.
View
15.
von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer J, Costa S, Eidtmann H, Fasching P
. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(15):1796-804.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595.
View
16.
Bear H, Tang G, Rastogi P, Geyer Jr C, Liu Q, Robidoux A
. Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant bevacizumab in early breast cancer (NSABP B-40 [NRG Oncology]): secondary outcomes of a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(9):1037-1048.
PMC: 4624323.
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00041-8.
View
17.
Earl H, Hiller L, Dunn J, Blenkinsop C, Grybowicz L, Vallier A
. Disease-free and overall survival at 3.5 years for neoadjuvant bevacizumab added to docetaxel followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, for women with HER2 negative early breast cancer: ARTemis Trial. Ann Oncol. 2017; 28(8):1817-1824.
PMC: 5834079.
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx173.
View
18.
von der Lippe Gythfeldt H, Lien T, Tekpli X, Silwal-Pandit L, Borgen E, Garred O
. Immune phenotype of tumor microenvironment predicts response to bevacizumab in neoadjuvant treatment of ER-positive breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2020; 147(9):2515-2525.
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33108.
View
19.
Janning M, Muller V, Vettorazzi E, Cubas-Cordova M, Gensch V, Ben-Batalla I
. Evaluation of soluble carbonic anhydrase IX as predictive marker for efficacy of bevacizumab: A biomarker analysis from the geparquinto phase III neoadjuvant breast cancer trial. Int J Cancer. 2019; 145(3):857-868.
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32163.
View
20.
Mariotto A, Etzioni R, Hurlbert M, Penberthy L, Mayer M
. Estimation of the Number of Women Living with Metastatic Breast Cancer in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017; 26(6):809-815.
PMC: 5833304.
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0889.
View