» Articles » PMID: 33853564

Consensus on Pre-operative Total Knee Replacement Education and Prehabilitation Recommendations: a UK-based Modified Delphi Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2021 Apr 15
PMID 33853564
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Over 90,000 total knee replacement (TKR) procedures are performed annually in the United Kingdom (UK). Patients awaiting TKR face long delays whilst enduring severe pain and functional limitations. Almost 20% of patients who undergo TKR are not satisfied post-operatively. Optimising pre-operative TKR education and prehabilitation could help improve patient outcomes pre- and post-operatively; however, current pre-operative TKR care varies widely. Definitive evidence on the optimal content and delivery of pre-operative TKR care is lacking. This study aimed to develop evidence- and consensus-based recommendations on pre-operative TKR education and prehabilitation.

Methods: A UK-based, three-round, online modified Delphi study was conducted with a 60-member expert panel. All panellists had experience of TKR services as patients (n = 30) or professionals (n = 30). Round 1 included initial recommendations developed from a mixed methods rapid review. Panellists rated the importance of each item on a five-point Likert scale. Panellists could also suggest additional items in Round 1. Rounds 2 and 3 included all items from Round 1, new items suggested in Round 1 and charts summarising panellists' importance ratings from the preceding round. Free-text responses were analysed using content analysis. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. All items rated as 'Important' or 'Very important' by at least 70% of all respondents in Round 3 were included in the final set of recommendations.

Results: Fifty-five panellists (92%) (patients n = 26; professionals n = 29) completed Round 3. Eighty-six recommendation items were included in Round 1. Fifteen new items were added in Round 2. Rounds 2 and 3 therefore included 101 items. Seventy-seven of these reached consensus in Round 3. Six items reached consensus amongst patient or professional panellists only in Round 3. The final set of recommendations comprises 34 education topics, 18 education delivery approaches, 10 exercise types, 13 exercise delivery approaches and two other treatments.

Conclusions: This modified Delphi study developed a comprehensive set of recommendations that represent a useful resource for guiding decision-making on the content and delivery of pre-operative TKR education and prehabilitation. The recommendations will need to be interpreted and reviewed periodically in light of emerging evidence.

Citing Articles

Above knee amputation following periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty: a fatal outcome.

Purcell C, Gangadharan R, Ampat G J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 2025(1):rjae806.

PMID: 39717412 PMC: 11663409. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjae806.


Developing lifestyle intervention program for pre-hypertensive patients; consensus building using a modified Delphi approach.

Hassan D, Rehman S, Khalid S, Tipu I, Husnain M PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0311766.

PMID: 39388493 PMC: 11469599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311766.


[Prehabilitation before total knee arthroplasty].

Valle C, von Roth P Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024; 53(11):819-823.

PMID: 39190158 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-024-04544-0.


Evaluating two implant designs in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty using a novel measure of early optimal recovery: a retrospective observational study.

van Keulen L, Sonnega R, Baas N, Hogervorst T, Muehlendyck C, Bourras P Musculoskelet Surg. 2024; 109(1):71-79.

PMID: 39093383 PMC: 11876230. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-024-00851-z.


Improved intra-operative decision making in RA-TKR with the help of pre-operative CT scan.

Mukartihal R, Arun S, Patil S, Reddy A, Annapareddy A, Ratnakar V J Orthop. 2024; 52:107-111.

PMID: 38440411 PMC: 10909574. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.02.023.


References
1.
Junger S, Payne S, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearley S . Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med. 2017; 31(8):684-706. DOI: 10.1177/0269216317690685. View

2.
Murphy M, Black N, Lamping D, McKEE C, Sanderson C, Askham J . Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess. 1998; 2(3):i-iv, 1-88. View

3.
Bunzli S, OBrien P, Ayton D, Dowsey M, Gunn J, Choong P . Misconceptions and the Acceptance of Evidence-based Nonsurgical Interventions for Knee Osteoarthritis. A Qualitative Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 477(9):1975-1983. PMC: 7000096. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000784. View

4.
Drew S, Judge A, Cohen R, Fitzpatrick R, Barker K, Gooberman-Hill R . Enhanced Recovery After Surgery implementation in practice: an ethnographic study of services for hip and knee replacement. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(3):e024431. PMC: 6429914. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024431. View

5.
Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C . Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011; 6(6):e20476. PMC: 3111406. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476. View