» Articles » PMID: 33853298

Results of Endoscopic Surgery in Patients with Pituitary Adenomas : Association of Tumor Classification Grades with Resection, Remission, and Complication Rates

Overview
Date 2021 Apr 15
PMID 33853298
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach is a widely-used method for the surgical treatment of pituitary adenomas. We aimed to evaluate the results of endoscopic surgery by comparing preoperative classification methods and investigating their relationship with postoperative resection and remission rates and complications.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 236 patients (118 males) who underwent surgery for pituitary adenomas. Preoperative Knosp classification, tumor size (TS), suprasellar extension (SSE), postoperative resection and remission rates, and complications were evaluated.

Results: The follow-up period was 3 months to 6 years. The patients' ages ranged between 16 and 84 years. Endocrinologically, 114 patients (48.3%) had functional adenoma (FA), and 122 patients (51.7%) had non-functional adenoma (NFA). Among the FA group, 92 (80.7%) showed remission. A statistically significant difference was found between patients with and without remission in terms of the Knosp, TS, and SSE classifications (p<0.01). Knosp, TS, and SSE classification grades were found to be correlated with the resection rates (p<0.01). Meningitis was seen in seven patients (3.0%), diabetes insipidus in 16 (6.9%; permanently in two [0.9%]), and rhinorrhea in 19 (8.1%). Thirty-six patients (15.3%) developed pituitary insufficiency and received hormone replacement therapy.

Conclusion: The resection categories and remission rates of FAs were directly proportional to the adenoma sizes and Knosp grades, while the degree of suprasellar growth further complicated resection and remission rates. Adenoma sizes less than 2 cm and SSEs less than 1 cm are associated with favorable remission and resection rates.

Citing Articles

Medium and Long-Term Data from a Series of 96 Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgeries for Cushing Disease.

Erkan B, Bayindir M, Akpinar E, Tanriverdi O, Hasimoglu O, Postalci L J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2024; 67(2):237-248.

PMID: 38449382 PMC: 10924914. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2023.0100.


Prognostic Models in Growth-Hormone- and Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review.

Dumitriu-Stan R, Burcea I, Salmen T, Poiana C Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 37371013 PMC: 10297306. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122118.


Analysis of neuroendoscopy for the treatment of macroadenomas and giant pituitary adenomas.

Wu J, Zhang B, Shao D, Ji S, Li Y, Xie S Front Surg. 2022; 9:956345.

PMID: 36034373 PMC: 9403245. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.956345.


Analysis of perioperative negative emotion risk factors in patients with pituitary adenoma and its impact on prognosis: a retrospective study.

Yang G, Shen S, Zhang J, Gu Y Gland Surg. 2022; 11(7):1240-1250.

PMID: 35935570 PMC: 9346215. DOI: 10.21037/gs-22-387.


Radiological Knosp, Revised-Knosp, and Hardy-Wilson Classifications for the Prediction of Surgical Outcomes in the Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery of Pituitary Adenomas: Study of 228 Cases.

Araujo-Castro M, Acitores Cancela A, Vior C, Pascual-Corrales E, Berrocal V Front Oncol. 2022; 11:807040.

PMID: 35127519 PMC: 8810816. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.807040.

References
1.
Phan K, Xu J, Reddy R, Kalakoti P, Nanda A, Fairhall J . Endoscopic Endonasal versus Microsurgical Transsphenoidal Approach for Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2016; 97:398-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.029. View

2.
Dallapiazza R, Grober Y, Starke R, Laws Jr E, Jane Jr J . Long-term results of endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas. Neurosurgery. 2014; 76(1):42-52. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000563. View

3.
Singh H, Essayed W, Cohen-Gadol A, Zada G, Schwartz T . Resection of pituitary tumors: endoscopic versus microscopic. J Neurooncol. 2016; 130(2):309-317. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2124-y. View

4.
Goncalves M, de Oliveira J, Williams H, Alvarenga R, Landeiro J . Cavernous sinus medial wall: dural or fibrous layer? Systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev. 2011; 35(2):147-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-011-0360-3. View

5.
Tamasauskas A, Sinkunas K, Draf W, Deltuva V, Matukevicius A, Rastenyte D . Management of cerebrospinal fluid leak after surgical removal of pituitary adenomas. Medicina (Kaunas). 2008; 44(4):302-7. View