Current and Future Perspectives of Digital Microscopy with Fluorescence Confocal Microscope for Prostate Tissue Interpretation: a Narrative Review

Overview

Journal Transl Androl Urol

Date 2021 Apr 14

PMID 33850791

Citations 5

Authors

Bernardo Rocco

Alessia Cimadamore

Luca Sarchi

Luca Reggiani Bonetti

Laura Bertoni

Paola Azzoni

Simone Assumma

Filippo Turri

Giorgio Bozzini

Ahmed Eissa

Salvatore Micali

Giampaolo Bianchi

Antonino Maiorana

Rodolfo Montironi

Giovanni Pellacani

Maria Chiara Sighinolfi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is an optical imaging technique providing digital microscopical images of fresh tissue in a real time fashion, without conventional processing. FCM has been widely applied in several fields of dermatology, including the detection of basal cell carcinoma and of cutaneous inflammatory diseases. The aim of the paper is to provide an overview of FCM applications in the field of prostate tissue interpretation and prostate cancer (PCa) detection. A Literature search (PubMed & Web of Science) was performed to identify articles concerned with the clinical and surgical applications of FCM in prostatic and periprostatic tissues interpretation. Overall, six articles were identified. All articles investigated the level of agreement between FCM and conventional histopathological analysis (hematoxylin-eosin, HE) for the discrimination between normal and PCa tissues. An investigative article on prostate samples retrieved from radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens and an atlas of FCM digital images from the same series were found. Two prospective clinical trials, comparing FCM and HE, pointed out a "substantial" to "almost perfect" discriminative performance of FCM for the diagnosis of PCa on prostate biopsy core. Finally, two studies investigated the intra-operative role of FCM during RP for the control of surgical dissection. In this setting, FCM could be used to analyse samples retrieved from suspicious peri-prostatic areas; FCM has also been tested for an en-face evaluation of flat slices obtained from the systematic sampling of the posterolateral aspects of the prostate, in a NeuroSAFE-like approach. Generally, FCM provides digital microscopical images of fresh tissue in a real time fashion, without requiring conventional processing. Currently, available studies confirmed a high concordance with conventional pathology for the detection of PCa. Further studies are required to validate the technology, to evaluate ISUP score attribution and to implement the fields of application of FCM for the treatment of prostate diseases.

Citing Articles

Embedding radical prostatectomy specimens: selective with regular cassettes or complete with large cassettes.

Montironi R, Cimadamore A, Lopez-Beltran A, Rogers E, Cheng L Virchows Arch. 2025; .

PMID: 39960510 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-025-04052-2.

Predicting contralateral extraprostatic extension in unilateral high-risk prostate cancer: a multicentric external validation study.

Diamand R, Roche J, Lacetera V, Simone G, Windisch O, Benamran D World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):247.

PMID: 38647728 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04966-7.

Real-Time Evaluation of Thyroid Cytology Using New Digital Microscopy Allows for Sample Adequacy Assessment, Morphological Classification, and Supports Molecular Analysis.

Verri M, Scarpino S, Naciu A, Lopez G, Tabacco G, Taffon C Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(17).

PMID: 37686491 PMC: 10486817. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174215.

Ex Vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy (FCM) Ensures Representative Tissue in Prostate Cancer Biobanking: A Feasibility Study.

Titze U, Sommerkamp J, Stege C, Schneider F, Brochhausen C, Schulz B Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(20).

PMID: 36292970 PMC: 9603154. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012103.

Impact of human placental derivative allografts on functional and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a literature review.

Noel J, Ahmed S, Mascarenhas A, Stirt D, Moschovas M, Patel E J Robot Surg. 2022; 17(2):265-273.

PMID: 35717486 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01433-6.

References

Rocco B, Sighinolfi M, Cimadamore A, Reggiani Bonetti L, Bertoni L, Puliatti S . Digital frozen section of the prostate surface during radical prostatectomy: a novel approach to evaluate surgical margins. BJU Int. 2020; 126(3):336-338. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15108. View

Reggiani C, Pellacani G, Bonetti L, Zanelli G, Azzoni P, Chester J . An intraoperative study with ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: diagnostic accuracy of the three visualization modalities. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020; 35(1):e92-e94. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16831. View

Paddock S, Eliceiri K . Laser scanning confocal microscopy: history, applications, and related optical sectioning techniques. Methods Mol Biol. 2013; 1075:9-47. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-847-8_2. View

Mir M, Bancalari B, Calatrava A, Casanova J, Dominguez Escrig J, Ramirez-Backhaus M . Ex-vivo confocal fluorescence microscopy for rapid evaluation of renal core biopsy. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019; 72(1):109-113. DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03627-0. View

Marenco J, Calatrava A, Casanova J, Claps F, Mascaros J, Wong A . Evaluation of Fluorescent Confocal Microscopy for Intraoperative Analysis of Prostate Biopsy Cores. Eur Urol Focus. 2020; 7(6):1254-1259. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.013. View

Puliatti S, Bertoni L, Pirola G, Azzoni P, Bevilacqua L, Eissa A . Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: the first application for real-time pathological examination of prostatic tissue. BJU Int. 2019; 124(3):469-476. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14754. View

Oxley J, Bray A, Rowe E . Could a Mohs technique make NeuroSAFE a viable option?. BJU Int. 2018; 122(3):358-359. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14377. View

Eissa A, Zoeir A, Sighinolfi M, Puliatti S, Bevilacqua L, Del Prete C . "Real-time" Assessment of Surgical Margins During Radical Prostatectomy: State-of-the-Art. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019; 18(2):95-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.07.012. View

Huang E, Knight S, Guetter C, Davis C, Moller M, Slama E . Telemedicine and telementoring in the surgical specialties: A narrative review. Am J Surg. 2019; 218(4):760-766. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.07.018. View

10.

Cimadamore A, Lopez-Beltran A, Scarpelli M, Cheng L, Montironi R . Digital pathology and COVID-19 and future crises: pathologists can safely diagnose cases from home using a consumer monitor and a mini PC. J Clin Pathol. 2020; 73(11):695-696. DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206943. View

11.

Longo C, Pampena R, Bombonato C, Gardini S, Piana S, Mirra M . Diagnostic accuracy of ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy in Mohs surgery of basal cell carcinomas: a prospective study on 753 margins. Br J Dermatol. 2018; 180(6):1473-1480. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17507. View

12.

Strom P, Kartasalo K, Olsson H, Solorzano L, Delahunt B, Berney D . Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21(2):222-232. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30738-7. View

13.

Yossepowitch O, Briganti A, Eastham J, Epstein J, Graefen M, Montironi R . Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update. Eur Urol. 2013; 65(2):303-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.07.039. View

14.

Cicione A, De Nunzio C, Manno S, Damiano R, Posti A, Lima E . An update on prostate biopsy in the era of magnetic resonance imaging. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018; 70(3):264-274. DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03048-5. View

15.

Gerston K, Blumberg L, Tshabalala V, Murray J . Viability of mycobacteria in formalin-fixed lungs. Hum Pathol. 2004; 35(5):571-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.01.009. View

16.

Montironi R, Cheng L, Cimadamore A, Lopez-Beltran A, Scarpelli M . Uropathologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: What Can Be Learned in Terms of Social Interaction, Visibility, and Social Distance. Eur Urol. 2020; 78(3):478-481. PMC: 7212258. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.070. View

17.

Boyette L, Reardon M, Mirelman A, Kirkley T, Lysiak J, Tuttle J . Fiberoptic imaging of cavernous nerves in vivo. J Urol. 2007; 178(6):2694-700. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.124. View

18.

Comperat E . What Does COVID-19 Mean for the Pathology-Urology Interaction?. Eur Urol. 2020; 78(1):e43-e44. PMC: 7136874. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.041. View

19.

Cimadamore A, Scarpelli M, Cheng L, Lopez-Beltran A, Galosi A, Montorsi F . Re: Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Bernardo Rocco's Words of Wisdom re: EAU Guidelines: Prostate Cancer 2019. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-Cancer/. Eur Urol 2019;76:871. Eur Urol. 2020; 77(5):e122-e127. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.02.005. View

20.

Amos W, White J . How the confocal laser scanning microscope entered biological research. Biol Cell. 2003; 95(6):335-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0248-4900(03)00078-9. View