» Articles » PMID: 33849924

Radiomics Analysis for Predicting Pembrolizumab Response in Patients with Advanced Rare Cancers

Abstract

Background: We present a radiomics-based model for predicting response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced rare cancers.

Methods: The study included 57 patients with advanced rare cancers who were enrolled in our phase II clinical trial of pembrolizumab. Tumor response was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and immune-related RECIST (irRECIST). Patients were categorized as 20 "controlled disease" (stable disease, partial response, or complete response) or 37 progressive disease). We used 3D-slicer to segment target lesions on standard-of-care, pretreatment contrast enhanced CT scans. We extracted 610 features (10 histogram-based features and 600 second-order texture features) from each volume of interest. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression was used to detect the most discriminatory features. Selected features were used to create a classification model, using XGBoost, for the prediction of tumor response to pembrolizumab. Leave-one-out cross-validation was performed to assess model performance.

Findings: The 10 most relevant radiomics features were selected; XGBoost-based classification successfully differentiated between controlled disease (complete response, partial response, stable disease) and progressive disease with high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in patients assessed by RECIST (94.7%, 97.3%, and 90%, respectively; p<0.001) and in patients assessed by irRECIST (94.7%, 93.9%, and 95.8%, respectively; p<0.001). Additionally, the common features of the RECIST and irRECIST groups also highly predicted pembrolizumab response with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and p value of 94.7%, 97%, 90%, p<0.001% and 96%, 96%, 95%, p<0.001, respectively.

Conclusion: Our radiomics-based signature identified imaging differences that predicted pembrolizumab response in patients with advanced rare cancer.

Interpretation: Our radiomics-based signature identified imaging differences that predicted pembrolizumab response in patients with advanced rare cancer.

Citing Articles

Radiomic analysis of patient and interorgan heterogeneity in response to immunotherapies and BRAF-targeted therapy in metastatic melanoma.

Tompkins A, Gray Z, Dadey R, Zenkin S, Batavani N, Newman S J Immunother Cancer. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39939139 PMC: 11822426. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-009568.


Integrating artificial intelligence into radiological cancer imaging: from diagnosis and treatment response to prognosis.

Zheng S, Cui X, Ye Z Cancer Biol Med. 2025; 22(1).

PMID: 39907115 PMC: 11795265. DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0422.


Preoperative CT radiomic model combined with clinical and CT imaging features to predict the spread through air spaces in T1 invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

Xu P, Yu H, Zhao H, Bian H, Jia D, Zhi S Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(10):6106-6118.

PMID: 39544799 PMC: 11558366. DOI: 10.62347/UJYU8551.


Predicting response to immunotherapy in oral squamous cell carcinoma via a CT-based radiomics model.

Ma Q, Ren J, Wang R, Yuan Y, Tao X BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):266.

PMID: 39375583 PMC: 11460018. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01444-9.


Using three-dimensional model-based tumour volume change to predict the symptom improvement in patients with renal cell cancer.

Fu C, Dong J, Zhang J, Li X, Zuo S, Zhang H 3 Biotech. 2024; 14(5):148.

PMID: 38711822 PMC: 11070407. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-024-03967-y.


References
1.
Ferris R, Blumenschein Jr G, Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas A, Licitra L . Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(19):1856-1867. PMC: 5564292. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602252. View

2.
Rosenberg J, Hoffman-Censits J, Powles T, van der Heijden M, Balar A, Necchi A . Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2016; 387(10031):1909-20. PMC: 5480242. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00561-4. View

3.
Le D, Uram J, Wang H, Bartlett B, Kemberling H, Eyring A . PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(26):2509-20. PMC: 4481136. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500596. View

4.
Taube J, Klein A, Brahmer J, Xu H, Pan X, Kim J . Association of PD-1, PD-1 ligands, and other features of the tumor immune microenvironment with response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20(19):5064-74. PMC: 4185001. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3271. View

5.
Davis A, Patel V . The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker: an analysis of all US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer. 2019; 7(1):278. PMC: 6815032. DOI: 10.1186/s40425-019-0768-9. View