» Articles » PMID: 33846433

Hemostasis, Coagulation and Thrombin in Venoarterial and Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: the HECTIC Study

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support has a high incidence of both bleeding and thrombotic complications. Despite clear differences in patient characteristics and pathologies between veno-venous (VV) and veno-arterial (VA) ECMO support, anticoagulation practices are often the same across modalities. Moreover, there is very little data on their respective coagulation profiles and comparisons of thrombin generation in these patients. This study compares the coagulation profile and thrombin generation between patients supported with either VV and VA ECMO. A prospective cohort study of patients undergoing VA and VV ECMO at an Intensive care department of a university hospital and ECMO referral centre. In addition to routine coagulation testing and heparin monitoring per unit protocol, thromboelastography (TEG), multiplate aggregometry (MEA), calibrated automated thrombinography (CAT) and von-Willebrand's activity (antigen and activity ratio) were sampled second-daily for 1 week, then weekly thereafter. VA patients had significantly lower platelets counts, fibrinogen, anti-thrombin and clot strength with higher d-dimer levels than VV patients, consistent with a more pronounced consumptive coagulopathy. Thrombin generation was higher in VA than VV patients, and the heparin dose required to suppress thrombin generation was lower in VA patients. There were no significant differences in total bleeding or thrombotic event rates between VV and VA patients when adjusted for days on extracorporeal support. VA patients received a lower median daily heparin dose 8500 IU [IQR 2500-24000] versus VV 28,800 IU [IQR 17,300-40,800.00]; < 0.001. Twenty-eight patients (72%) survived to hospital discharge; comprising 53% of VA patients and 77% of VV patients. Significant differences between the coagulation profiles of VA and VV patients exist, and anticoagulation strategies for patients of these modalities should be different. Further research into the development of tailored anticoagulation strategies that include the mode of ECMO support need to be completed.

Citing Articles

Anticoagulation and associated complications in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vlok R, Buscher H, Delaney A, Garside T, McDonald G, Chatoor R Crit Care Resusc. 2025; 26(4):332-363.

PMID: 39781486 PMC: 11704180. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.10.003.


Successful Microsurgical Clipping under Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Treatment for a Poor-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patient with Severe Pulmonary Neurogenic Lung.

Saito K, Ito S, Miyata T, Mayanagi K, Inamasu J, Nakatsukasa M Asian J Neurosurg. 2024; 19(4):812-815.

PMID: 39606301 PMC: 11588602. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791189.


Neutrophils: a key component in ECMO-related acute organ injury.

Zhang M, Li S, Ying J, Qu Y Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1432018.

PMID: 39346902 PMC: 11427252. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1432018.


Surface Engineering for Endothelium-Mimicking Functions to Combat Infection and Thrombosis in Extracorporeal Life Support Technologies.

Ashcraft M, Garren M, Lautner-Csorba O, Pinon V, Wu Y, Crowley D Adv Healthc Mater. 2024; 13(22):e2400492.

PMID: 38924661 PMC: 11468007. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202400492.


Refractory ventricular fibrillation secondary to hyperkalemia resuscitated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A case report.

Lin K, Siao F Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e31178.

PMID: 38799756 PMC: 11126849. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31178.


References
1.
Gaffney A, Wildhirt S, Griffin M, Annich G, Radomski M . Extracorporeal life support. BMJ. 2010; 341:c5317. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c5317. View

2.
Mazzeffi M, Strauss E, Meyer M, Hasan S, Judd M, Abuelkasem E . Coagulation Factor Levels and Underlying Thrombin Generation Patterns in Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients. Anesth Analg. 2019; 129(3):659-666. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004275. View

3.
Nair P, Hoechter D, Buscher H, Venkatesh K, Whittam S, Joseph J . Prospective observational study of hemostatic alterations during adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) using point-of-care thromboelastometry and platelet aggregometry. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015; 29(2):288-96. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.06.006. View

4.
Urlesberger B, Zobel G, Zenz W, Maurer U, Reiterer F, Riccabona M . Activation of the clotting system during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in term newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1996; 129(2):264-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70252-4. View

5.
Lukito P, Wong A, Jing J, Arthur J, Marasco S, Murphy D . Mechanical circulatory support is associated with loss of platelet receptors glycoprotein Ibα and glycoprotein VI. J Thromb Haemost. 2016; 14(11):2253-2260. DOI: 10.1111/jth.13497. View