» Articles » PMID: 33844691

Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus Antibody Prevalence in Mauritanian Livestock (cattle, Goats, Sheep and Camels) is Stratified by the Animal's Age

Overview
Date 2021 Apr 12
PMID 33844691
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) is one of the most widespread zoonotic arthropod-borne viruses in many parts of Africa, Europe and Asia. It belongs to the family of Nairoviridae in the genus of Orthonairovirus. The main reservoir and vector are ticks of the genus Hyalomma. Livestock animals (such as cattle, small ruminants and camels) develop a viremias lasting up to two weeks with absence of clinical symptoms, followed by seroconversion. This study was carried out to assess risk factors that affect seroprevalence rates in different species. In total, 928 livestock animal samples (cattle = 201; sheep = 247; goats = 233; camels = 247) from 11 out of 13 regions in Mauritania were assayed for CCHFV-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (including a novel indirect camel-IgG-specific CCHFV ELISA). Inconclusive results were resolved by an immunofluorescence assay (IFA). A generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) was used to draw conclusions about the impact of certain factors (age, species, sex and region) which might have influenced the CCHFV antibody status of surveyed animals. In goats and sheep, about 15% of the animals were seropositive, whereas in cattle (69%) and camels (81%), the prevalence rate was significantly higher. On average, cattle and camels were up to twice to four times older than small ruminants. Interestingly, the seroprevalence in all species was directly linked to the age of the animals, i.e. older animals had significantly higher seroprevalence rates than younger animals. The highest CCHFV seroprevalence in Mauritania was found in camels and cattle, followed by small ruminants. The large proportion of positive animals in cattle and camels might be explained by the high ages of the animals. Future CCHFV prevalence studies should at least consider the age of surveyed animals in order to avoid misinterpretations.

Citing Articles

Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus in ticks, domestic, and wild animals.

Celina S, Italiya J, Tekkara A, cerny J Front Vet Sci. 2025; 11:1513123.

PMID: 39897158 PMC: 11782920. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1513123.


Serological evidence of tick-borne Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever and Dugbe orthonairovirus infections in cattle in Kwara State in northern Nigeria indicate independent endemics.

Daodu O, Hartlaub J, Olopade J, Oluwayelu D, Groschup M PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(10):e0012539.

PMID: 39432870 PMC: 11493413. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012539.


Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever outbreak in Northern Senegal in 2022: Prevalence of the virus in livestock and ticks, associated risk factors and epidemiological implications.

Ngom D, Khoule A, Faye E, Sene O, Diop S, Sagne S Zoonoses Public Health. 2024; 71(6):696-707.

PMID: 38627964 PMC: 11368619. DOI: 10.1111/zph.13136.


Investigating Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus seropositivity in camels and human behavioural risks in an abattoir in Nigeria.

Adamu A, Onoja A, Ugbodu V, Bala R, Maina M, Salisu U Epidemiol Infect. 2024; 152:e29.

PMID: 38299329 PMC: 10894886. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268824000189.


Dynamics of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in two wild ungulate hosts during a disease-induced population collapse.

Carrera-Faja L, Espunyes J, Cardells J, Aguilar X, Pailler-Garcia L, Napp S One Health. 2023; 17:100622.

PMID: 38024274 PMC: 10665167. DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100622.


References
1.
Whitehouse C . Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever. Antiviral Res. 2004; 64(3):145-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2004.08.001. View

2.
Apolloni A, Nicolas G, Coste C, El Mamy A, Yahya B, El Arbi A . Towards the description of livestock mobility in Sahelian Africa: Some results from a survey in Mauritania. PLoS One. 2018; 13(1):e0191565. PMC: 5783398. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191565. View

3.
Lardeux F, Torrico G, Aliaga C . Calculation of the ELISA's cut-off based on the change-point analysis method for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Bolivian dogs in the absence of controls. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2016; 111(8):501-4. PMC: 4981115. DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760160119. View

4.
Suliman H, Adam I, Saeed S, Abdelaziz S, Haroun E, Aradaib I . Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever among the one-humped camel (Camelus dromedaries) in Central Sudan. Virol J. 2017; 14(1):147. PMC: 5543554. DOI: 10.1186/s12985-017-0816-3. View

5.
Kasi K, von Arnim F, Schulz A, Rehman A, Chudhary A, Oneeb M . Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus in ticks collected from livestock in Balochistan, Pakistan. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020; 67(4):1543-1552. DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13488. View