» Articles » PMID: 33843946

Evaluation of Time-Limited Trials Among Critically Ill Patients With Advanced Medical Illnesses and Reduction of Nonbeneficial ICU Treatments

Abstract

Importance: For critically ill patients with advanced medical illnesses and poor prognoses, overuse of invasive intensive care unit (ICU) treatments may prolong suffering without benefit.

Objective: To examine whether use of time-limited trials (TLTs) as the default care-planning approach for critically ill patients with advanced medical illnesses was associated with decreased duration and intensity of nonbeneficial ICU care.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This prospective quality improvement study was conducted from June 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, at the medical ICUs of 3 academic public hospitals in California. Patients at risk for nonbeneficial ICU treatments due to advanced medical illnesses were identified using categories from the Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines for admission and triage.

Interventions: Clinicians were trained to use TLTs as the default communication and care-planning approach in meetings with family and surrogate decision makers.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Quality of family meetings (process measure) and ICU length of stay (clinical outcome measure).

Results: A total of 209 patients were included (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [16.3] years; 127 men [60.8%]; 101 Hispanic patients [48.3%]), with 113 patients (54.1%) in the preintervention period and 96 patients (45.9%) in the postintervention period. Formal family meetings increased from 68 of 113 (60.2%) to 92 of 96 (95.8%) patients between the preintervention and postintervention periods (P < .01). Key components of family meetings, such as discussions of risks and benefits of ICU treatments (preintervention, 15 [34.9%] vs postintervention, 56 [94.9%]; P < .01), eliciting values and preferences of patients (20 [46.5%] vs 58 [98.3%]; P < .01), and identifying clinical markers of improvement (9 [20.9%] vs 52 [88.1%]; P < .01), were discussed more frequently after intervention. Median ICU length of stay was significantly reduced between preintervention and postintervention periods (8.7 [interquartile range (IQR), 5.7-18.3] days vs 7.4 [IQR, 5.2-11.5] days; P = .02). Hospital mortality was similar between the preintervention and postintervention periods (66 of 113 [58.4%] vs 56 of 96 [58.3%], respectively; P = .99). Invasive ICU procedures were used less frequently in the postintervention period (eg, mechanical ventilation preintervention, 97 [85.8%] vs postintervention, 70 [72.9%]; P = .02).

Conclusions And Relevance: In this study, a quality improvement intervention that trained physicians to communicate and plan ICU care with family members of critically ill patients in the ICU using TLTs was associated with improved quality of family meetings and a reduced intensity and duration of ICU treatments. This study highlights a patient-centered approach for treating critically ill patients that may reduce nonbeneficial ICU care.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04181294.

Citing Articles

Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: Integrating the 'Time-limited Trial' in the emergency department.

Hashimoto T, Putman R, Massaro A, Shiozawa Y, McGough K, McCabe K PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0313858.

PMID: 39715103 PMC: 11666031. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313858.


ICU Admission Preferences in the Hypothetical Event of Acute Critical Illness: A Survey of Very Old Norwegians and Their Next-of-Kins.

Schwarz G, Skaar E, Miljeteig I, Hufthammer K, Burns K, Kvale R Crit Care Explor. 2024; 6(12):e1185.

PMID: 39652434 PMC: 11630954. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001185.


Unclear Trajectory and Uncertain Benefit: Creating a Lexicon for Clinical Uncertainty in Patients with Critical or Advanced Illness Using a Delphi Consensus Process.

McGowan S, Corrales-Martinez M, Brender T, Smith A, Kim S, Harrison K Med Decis Making. 2024; 45(1):34-44.

PMID: 39559986 PMC: 11645224. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X241293446.


Goals of care conversations and advance care planning for paediatric patients living with serious illness.

Rapoport A Paediatr Child Health. 2024; 29(6):397-410.

PMID: 39539786 PMC: 11557145. DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxae041.


Les objectifs des échanges sur les soins et de la planification préalable des soins chez les patients d'âge pédiatrique atteints d'une maladie grave.

Rapoport A Paediatr Child Health. 2024; 29(6):397-410.

PMID: 39539778 PMC: 11557128. DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxae038.


References
1.
Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D . SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 25(12):986-992. PMC: 5256233. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. View

2.
Curtis J, Rubenfeld G . Improving palliative care for patients in the intensive care unit. J Palliat Med. 2005; 8(4):840-54. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.840. View

3.
Nilsen P . Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015; 10:53. PMC: 4406164. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0. View

4.
Kon A, Davidson J, Morrison W, Danis M, White D . Shared Decision-Making in Intensive Care Units. Executive Summary of the American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 193(12):1334-6. PMC: 4910896. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0269ED. View

5.
Turnbull A, Davis W, Needham D, White D, Eakin M . Intensivist-reported Facilitators and Barriers to Discussing Post-Discharge Outcomes with Intensive Care Unit Surrogates. A Qualitative Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016; 13(9):1546-52. PMC: 5059504. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-212OC. View