Surface Area Graphic Evaluation (SAGE) Diagram Documentation in Burn Patients: Room for Quality Improvement

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2021 Apr 12

PMID 33842109

Authors

Mattalynn Chavez-Navin

Barkat Ali

EunHo Eunice Choi

Ryan Keffer

Sydney Cooper

Whitney Elks

Victor Andujo

Gregory Borah

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background The first step in the management of burn patients is an accurate estimation of the total body surface area (TBSA) involvement. Depending on which, burns are categorized as major (>20%) and minor (<20%). This then dictates fluid resuscitation and level of care. At the University of New Mexico Burn Center, we use Surface Area Graphic Evaluation (SAGE) diagramming to objectively estimate the body surface area involvement. We hypothesized patients undergoing SAGE documentation will have better outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective study of 320 consecutive patients from 2014-2018 at the University of New Mexico Burn Center. Only patients treated surgically were included. We recorded patient demographics, comorbidities, and burn details. The primary measure of interest was SAGE documentation and the secondary measure of interest was outcomes associated with it. Results We found that a SAGE diagram was only documented for a minority of patients (40%). After comparing patients in the SAGE group vs. No SAGE group, we found that the patients were the same in both groups with regards to demographics, comorbidities, and burn characteristics. The use of a SAGE diagram did not appear to be a significant predictor of complications, including surgical site infections, graft loss, donor site complications, postoperative pneumonia, urinary tract infections, deep vein thrombosis, or myocardial infarction (p=0.254). Conclusion Only a minority of patients get a SAGE diagram documented. However, our study did not find any improved outcomes with the use of a SAGE diagram. There is a need for prospective studies to validate the utility of SAGE diagramming in predicting adverse outcomes in major burns.

References

Parvizi D, Kamolz L, Giretzlehner M, Haller H, Trop M, Selig H . The potential impact of wrong TBSA estimations on fluid resuscitation in patients suffering from burns: things to keep in mind. Burns. 2013; 40(2):241-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.06.019. View

Harish V, Raymond A, Issler A, Lajevardi S, Chang L, Maitz P . Accuracy of burn size estimation in patients transferred to adult Burn Units in Sydney, Australia: an audit of 698 patients. Burns. 2014; 41(1):91-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.05.005. View

Haller H, Dirnberger J, Giretzlehner M, Rodemund C, Kamolz L . "Understanding burns": research project BurnCase 3D--overcome the limits of existing methods in burns documentation. Burns. 2008; 35(3):311-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.07.010. View

Retrouvey H, Chan J, Shahrokhi S . Comparison of two-dimensional methods versus three-dimensional scanning systems in the assessment of total body surface area estimation in burn patients. Burns. 2017; 44(1):195-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.07.003. View

Farrar E, Pujji O, Jeffery S . Three-dimensional wound mapping software compared to expert opinion in determining wound area. Burns. 2017; 43(8):1736-1741. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.015. View

Neuwalder J, Sampson C, Breuing K, Orgill D . A review of computer-aided body surface area determination: SAGE II and EPRI's 3D Burn Vision. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002; 23(1):55-9; discussion 54. DOI: 10.1097/00004630-200201000-00011. View

Alharbi Z, Piatkowski A, Dembinski R, Reckort S, Grieb G, Kauczok J . Treatment of burns in the first 24 hours: simple and practical guide by answering 10 questions in a step-by-step form. World J Emerg Surg. 2012; 7(1):13. PMC: 3506488. DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-7-13. View

Roman J, Shank W, Demirjian J, Tang A, Vercruysse G . Overutilization of Helicopter Transport in the Minimally Burned-A Healthcare System Problem That Should Be Corrected. J Burn Care Res. 2019; 41(1):15-22. DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irz143. View

Serrano C, Boloix-Tortosa R, Gomez-Cia T, Acha B . Features identification for automatic burn classification. Burns. 2015; 41(8):1883-1890. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.05.011. View

10.

Hagstrom M, Wirth G, Evans G, Ikeda C . A review of emergency department fluid resuscitation of burn patients transferred to a regional, verified burn center. Ann Plast Surg. 2003; 51(2):173-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.SAP.0000058494.24203.99. View

11.

Richard R, Jones J, Parshley P . Hierarchical decomposition of burn body diagram based on cutaneous functional units and its utility. J Burn Care Res. 2014; 36(1):33-43. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000150. View

12.

Freiburg C, Igneri P, Sartorelli K, Rogers F . Effects of differences in percent total body surface area estimation on fluid resuscitation of transferred burn patients. J Burn Care Res. 2007; 28(1):42-8. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0B013E31802C88B2. View

13.

Hettiaratchy S, Papini R . Initial management of a major burn: II--assessment and resuscitation. BMJ. 2004; 329(7457):101-3. PMC: 449823. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7457.101. View