» Articles » PMID: 33842035

Which Hop Tests Can Best Identify Functional Limb Asymmetry in Patients 9-12 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Employing a Hamstrings Tendon Autograft?

Overview
Date 2021 Apr 12
PMID 33842035
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Hop tests are commonly employed to evaluate functional limb symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Purpose: To investigate the ability of eight hop tests to identify functional limb asymmetry in patients after ACLR.

Study Design: Prospective cohort.

Methods: Fifty patients were assessed 9-12 months following ACLR. Functional performance on both the operated and non-operated limb was assessed via eight hop tests, assessed in a randomised order. These included the: single (SHD), triple (THD) and triple crossover (TCHD) hop for distance, 6m timed hop (6MTH), single medial (MHD) and single lateral (LHD) hop for distance, single countermovement jump (SLCMJ) and timed speedy hop (TSHT). Differences in Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) across hop tests were compared, while Pearson's correlations were undertaken to investigate the significance and strength of the association between hop test LSIs.

Results: Significant differences were observed across hop LSIs (p<0.0001). Mean LSIs for the SHD (95.0%), 6MTH (95.0%), THD (96.1%) and TCHD (95.3%) were ≥90% and significantly greater (p<0.05) than the MHD (87.3%), LHD (87.5%), SLCMJ (83.4%) and TSHT (86.5%), which were all <90%. The LSI for the SLCMJ was significantly lower (p<0.05) than all other hop tests. While significant correlations existed across the majority of hop LSIs, the strongest correlations existed between the SHD, THD and TCHD (r=0.70-0.80), and lowest correlations between the TSHT and the other hop tests (r=0.26-0.49).

Conclusions: The LHD, MHD and TSHT, as well as the SLCMJ in particular, were best able to demonstrate functional limb asymmetry in patients following ACLR. These hop measures should be incorporated into hop test batteries, if the purpose is to detect the presence of lingering functional deficits.

Level Of Evidence: Level 3.

Citing Articles

Relationship Between Single-Leg Vertical Jump and Drop Jump Performance, and Return to Sports After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Graft.

Ohji S, Aizawa J, Hirohata K, Ohmi T, Kawasaki T, Koga H Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024; 19(10):1204-1215.

PMID: 39371195 PMC: 11446733. DOI: 10.26603/001c.123479.


A hop testing alternative for functional performance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Ripic Z, Letter M, Schoenwether B, Kaplan L, Baraga M, Costello Ii J PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309003.

PMID: 39150940 PMC: 11329148. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309003.


Qualitative and quantitative return-to-sport test battery and second anterior cruciate ligament injury risk factors.

Butler L, Martinez A, Entessari M, Cardenas G, Wright M, Sugimoto D BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024; 10(3):e002000.

PMID: 39104374 PMC: 11298729. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002000.


Assessing the Relationship of Psychological Sport Readiness, Single-leg Vertical Jump, and Non-Sagittal Single-Leg Hops to Quadriceps Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Kuwik P, Florkiewicz E, Benedict T, Mason J, Morris J, Crowell M Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024; 19(8):942-955.

PMID: 39100937 PMC: 11297365. DOI: 10.26603/001c.121597.


Reliability of Spatiotemporal Characteristics During Single-Legged Hop and Bilateral Drop Jump Tasks Using an Instrumented Pressure Walkway.

McManigal M, Post A, Allen M, Jorgensen A, Rosenthal M, Wellsandt M Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024; 19(6):704-713.

PMID: 38835980 PMC: 11144667. DOI: 10.26603/001c.117401.


References
1.
Gustavsson A, Neeter C, Thomee P, Silbernagel K, Augustsson J, Thomee R . A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006; 14(8):778-88. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0045-6. View

2.
Hegedus E, McDonough S, Bleakley C, Cook C, Baxter G . Clinician-friendly lower extremity physical performance measures in athletes: a systematic review of measurement properties and correlation with injury, part 1. The tests for knee function including the hop tests. Br J Sports Med. 2014; 49(10):642-8. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094094. View

3.
Wiggins A, Grandhi R, Schneider D, Stanfield D, Webster K, Myer G . Risk of Secondary Injury in Younger Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(7):1861-76. PMC: 5501245. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515621554. View

4.
Itoh H, Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Ichihashi N, Mizuno K . Evaluation of functional deficits determined by four different hop tests in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998; 6(4):241-5. DOI: 10.1007/s001670050106. View

5.
Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen A . Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish registry for knee ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(7):1551-7. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512446000. View