» Articles » PMID: 33838448

Beyond Rationality: Expanding the Practice of Shared Decision Making in Modern Medicine

Overview
Journal Soc Sci Med
Date 2021 Apr 10
PMID 33838448
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The contemporary healthcare field operates according to an autonomy model of medical decision-making. This model stipulates that patients have the right to make informed choices about their care. Shared decision making (SDM) has arisen as the dominant approach for clinicians and patients to collaborate in care planning and implementation. This approach relies heavily on normative (rational) decision-making processes, and often leaves out descriptive influences that stem from personal, social, and environmental factors and explain how decisions are typically made in the real world. The lack of attention to descriptive decision-making limits SDM in many ways. A multi-level approach to expanding the practice of SDM is proposed, including tailoring the decision encounter based on patients' social, cultural, and environmental context; using relational elements strategically as part of the SDM process; and modifying incentive models to promote greater attention to descriptive impacts on decision-making. These modifications are expected to make SDM, and thus patient care, more inclusive, effective, and acceptable to diverse patients.

Citing Articles

Communication and relationships: how patients perceive informational and interactional organizational justice can improve patient-centered care, a study with samples from Spain and the U.S.

Perez-Arechaederra D, Briones E, Garcia-Ortiz L BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):350.

PMID: 40050937 PMC: 11883949. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12461-x.


Examining how goals of care communication are conducted between doctors and patients with severe acute illness in hospital settings: A realist systematic review.

Gross J, Koffman J PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0299933.

PMID: 38498549 PMC: 10947705. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299933.


Understanding how and under what circumstances decision coaching works for people making healthcare decisions: a realist review.

Zhao J, Jull J, Finderup J, Smith M, Kienlin S, Rahn A BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022; 22(1):265.

PMID: 36209086 PMC: 9548102. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-02007-0.


An absence of equipoise: Examining surgeons' decision talk during encounters with women considering breast cancer surgery.

Politi M, Saunders C, Grabinski V, Yen R, Cyr A, Durand M PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0260704.

PMID: 34914705 PMC: 8675712. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260704.

References
1.
Clayman M, Gulbrandsen P, Morris M . A patient in the clinic; a person in the world. Why shared decision making needs to center on the person rather than the medical encounter. Patient Educ Couns. 2016; 100(3):600-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.016. View

2.
Arrieta A, Garcia-Prado A, Gonzalez P, Pinto-Prades J . Risk attitudes in medical decisions for others: An experimental approach. Health Econ. 2017; 26 Suppl 3:97-113. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3628. View

3.
Skirbekk H, Middelthon A, Hjortdahl P, Finset A . Mandates of trust in the doctor-patient relationship. Qual Health Res. 2011; 21(9):1182-90. DOI: 10.1177/1049732311405685. View

4.
Rosen A, Tsai J, Downs S . Variations in risk attitude across race, gender, and education. Med Decis Making. 2003; 23(6):511-7. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X03258431. View

5.
Gigerenzer G, Brighton H . Homo heuristicus: why biased minds make better inferences. Top Cogn Sci. 2014; 1(1):107-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x. View