» Articles » PMID: 33836812

Post-extubation Oxygenation Strategies in Acute Respiratory Failure: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2021 Apr 10
PMID 33836812
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: High-flow nasal cannula oxygenation (HFNC) and noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) possibly decrease tracheal reintubation rates better than conventional oxygen therapy (COT); however, few large-scale studies have compared HFNC and NPPV. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the effectiveness of three post-extubation respiratory support devices (HFNC, NPPV, and COT) in reducing the mortality and reintubation risk.

Methods: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ichushi databases were searched. COT, NPPV, and HFNC use were assessed in patients who were aged ≥ 16 years, underwent invasive mechanical ventilation for > 12 h for acute respiratory failure, and were scheduled for extubation after spontaneous breathing trials. The GRADE Working Group Approach was performed using a frequentist-based approach with multivariate random-effect meta-analysis. Short-term mortality and reintubation and post-extubation respiratory failure rates were compared.

Results: After evaluating 4631 records, 15 studies and 2600 patients were included. The main cause of acute hypoxic respiratory failure was pneumonia. Although NPPV/HFNC use did not significantly lower the mortality risk (relative risk [95% confidence interval] 0.75 [0.53-1.06] and 0.92 [0.67-1.27]; low and moderate certainty, respectively), HFNC use significantly lowered the reintubation risk (0.54 [0.32-0.89]; high certainty) compared to COT use. The associations of mortality with NPPV and HFNC use with respect to either outcome did not differ significantly (short-term mortality and reintubation, relative risk [95% confidence interval] 0.81 [0.61-1.08] and 1.02 [0.53-1.97]; moderate and very low certainty, respectively).

Conclusion: NPPV or HFNC use may not reduce the risk of short-term mortality; however, they may reduce the risk of endotracheal reintubation.

Trial Registration Number And Date Of Registration: PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020139112, 01/21/2020).

Citing Articles

Comparison of ROX index with modified indices incorporating heart rate, flow rate, and PaO/FiO ratio for early prediction of outcomes among patients initiated on post-extubation high-flow nasal cannula therapy.

Gutta S, Ong W, Sajeed S, Chern B, Gulati Kansal M, Khan F Eur J Med Res. 2025; 30(1):166.

PMID: 40083017 PMC: 11907874. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-025-02402-z.


Noninvasive respiratory support following extubation in critically ill adults with obesity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Pensier J, Naudet-Lasserre A, Monet C, Capdevila M, Aarab Y, Lakbar I EClinicalMedicine. 2025; 79():103002.

PMID: 39791108 PMC: 11715126. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103002.


Association between high-flow nasal cannula use and mortality in patients with sepsis-induced acute lung injury: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Song L, Li M, Zhang T, Huang L, Ying J, Ying L BMC Pulm Med. 2024; 24(1):197.

PMID: 38649913 PMC: 11036692. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-03022-9.


Physical and respiratory therapy in the critically ill patient with obesity: a narrative review.

Martinez-Camacho M, Jones-Baro R, Gomez-Gonzalez A, Morales-Hernandez D, Lugo-Garcia D, Melo-Villalobos A Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1321692.

PMID: 38455478 PMC: 10918845. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1321692.


Personalized Noninvasive Respiratory Support in the Perioperative Setting: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

Misseri G, Frassanito L, Simonte R, Rosa T, Grieco D, Piersanti A J Pers Med. 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38248757 PMC: 10817439. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010056.


References
1.
Ni Y, Luo J, Yu H, Liu D, Ni Z, Cheng J . Can High-flow Nasal Cannula Reduce the Rate of Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation?: A Systematic Review and.... Chest. 2017; 151(4):764-775. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.01.004. View

2.
Bello G, De Pascale G, Antonelli M . Noninvasive Ventilation. Clin Chest Med. 2016; 37(4):711-721. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.07.011. View

3.
Song H, Gu J, Xiu H, Cui W, Zhang G . The value of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy after extubation in patients with acute respiratory failure. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017; 72(9):562-567. PMC: 5629746. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2017(09)07. View

4.
Fernandez R, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G, Laborda C, Masclans J . High-flow nasal cannula to prevent postextubation respiratory failure in high-risk non-hypercapnic patients: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2017; 7(1):47. PMC: 5413462. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-017-0270-9. View

5.
Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Gonzalez P, Canabal A . Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Postextubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016; 316(15):1565-1574. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.14194. View