» Articles » PMID: 33836520

Unsupervised Machine Learning Can Delineate Central Sulcus by Using the Spatiotemporal Characteristic of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials

Overview
Journal J Neural Eng
Date 2021 Apr 9
PMID 33836520
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) recorded with electrocorticography (ECoG) for central sulcus (CS) identification is a widely accepted procedure in routine intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Clinical practices test the short-latency SSEPs for the phase reversal over strip electrodes. However, assessments based on waveform morphology are susceptible to variations in interpretations due to the hand area's localized nature and usually require multiple electrode placements or electrode relocation. We investigated the feasibility of unsupervised delineation of the CS by using the spatiotemporal patterns of the SSEP captured with the ECoG grid.. Intraoperatively, SSEPs were recorded from eight patients using ECoG grids placed over the sensorimotor cortex. Neurosurgeons blinded to the electrophysiology identified the sensory and motor gyri using neuronavigation based on sulcal anatomy. We quantified the most discriminatory time points in SSEPs temporal profile between the primary motor (M1) and somatosensory (S1) cortex using the Fisher discrimination criterion. We visualized the amplitude gradient of the SSEP over a 2D heat map to provide visual feedback for the delineation of the CS based on electrophysiology. Subsequently, we employed spectral clustering using the entire the SSEP waveform without selecting any time points and grouped ECoG channels in an unsupervised fashion.Consistently in all patients, two different time points provided almost equal discrimination between anterior and posterior channels, which vividly outlined the CS when we viewed the SSEP amplitude distribution as a spatial 2D heat map. The first discriminative time point was in proximity to the conventionally favored ∼20 ms peak (N20), and the second time point was slightly later than the markedly high ∼30 ms peak (P30). Still, the location of these time points varied noticeably across subjects. Unsupervised clustering approach separated the anterior and posterior channels with an accuracy of 96.3% based on the time derivative of the SSEP trace without the need for a subject-specific time point selection. In contrast, the raw trace resulted in an accuracy of 88.0%.. We show that the unsupervised clustering of the SSEP trace assessed with subdural electrode grids can delineate the CS automatically with high precision, and the constructed heat maps can localize the motor cortex. We anticipate that the spatiotemporal patterns of SSEP fused with machine learning can serve as a useful tool to assist in surgical planning.

Citing Articles

Mapping of the central sulcus using non-invasive ultra-high-density brain recordings.

Schreiner L, Jordan M, Sieghartsleitner S, Kapeller C, Pretl H, Kamada K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6527.

PMID: 38499709 PMC: 10948849. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57167-y.


Long-latency gamma modulation after median nerve stimulation delineates the central sulcus and contrasts the states of consciousness.

Asman P, Pellizzer G, Tummala S, Tasnim I, Bastos D, Bhavsar S Clin Neurophysiol. 2022; 145:1-10.

PMID: 36370685 PMC: 11905291. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.10.008.


Machine learning and clinical neurophysiology.

Ray J, Wijesekera L, Cirstea S J Neurol. 2022; 269(12):6678-6684.

PMID: 35907045 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11283-9.


Automated intraoperative central sulcus localization and somatotopic mapping using median nerve stimulation.

Xie T, Wu Z, Schalk G, Tong Y, Vato A, Raviv N J Neural Eng. 2022; 19(4).

PMID: 35785769 PMC: 9534515. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac7dfd.

References
1.
Gross D, Merlet I, Boling W, Gotman J . Relationships between the epileptic focus and hand area in central epilepsy: combining dipole models and anatomical landmarks. J Neurosurg. 2000; 92(5):785-92. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2000.92.5.0785. View

2.
Cedzich C, Taniguchi M, Schafer S, Schramm J . Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region. Neurosurgery. 1996; 38(5):962-70. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199605000-00023. View

3.
Endisch C, Storm C, Ploner C, Leithner C . Amplitudes of SSEP and outcome in cardiac arrest survivors: A prospective cohort study. Neurology. 2015; 85(20):1752-60. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002123. View

4.
Pondal-Sordo M, Diosy D, Tellez-Zenteno J, Girvin J, Wiebe S . Epilepsy surgery involving the sensory-motor cortex. Brain. 2006; 129(Pt 12):3307-14. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awl305. View

5.
Jiang T, Liu S, Pellizzer G, Aydoseli A, Karamursel S, Sabanci P . Characterization of Hand Clenching in Human Sensorimotor Cortex Using High-, and Ultra-High Frequency Band Modulations of Electrocorticogram. Front Neurosci. 2018; 12:110. PMC: 5835101. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00110. View