» Articles » PMID: 33835197

[Evidence-based Primary Prevention and Health Promotion: Methods and Procedures in 5 Research Consortia]

Abstract

Between 2014 and 2022, the 5 German research networks AEQUIPA, CAPITAL4HEALTH, HLCA, PartKommPlus, and SMARTACT are investigating topics of primary prevention and health promotion with the aim of further deepening the evidence base in these areas. The work of the 5 research networks for primary prevention and health promotion is presented, analysed, and discussed from an internal perspective. A model of evidence-based public health serves as a structuring framework.The 5 research networks use a variety of access routes for the generation of evidence with regard to the participation of nonacademic, civil society actors and users. There is a wide range of study designs - from randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews to diverse qualitative designs. The use of models and theories supports the evidence base. Beyond evidence generation, all research networks focus on at least exemplary implementation of new evidence.Due to the diversity of methods, a diversified evidence-based approach can be realised, taking into account network-specific aspects. Structural circumstances limit the further systematic strengthening of the evidence base. In particular, the involvement of nonacademic, civil society actors for the work with hard-to-reach target groups often cannot be financed or is considered too time consuming under the given circumstances. The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the importance of a flexible spectrum of methods, employing both digital and analogue methods in a meaningful way.

Citing Articles

[Effects of citizen involvement and participation in knowledge processes of integrated municipal health promotion: a systematic scoping review].

Hartung S, Houwaart S, von Ruden U, Schaefer I Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025; 68(3):323-335.

PMID: 39964441 PMC: 11868145. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-025-04013-9.


Efficacy of Individualized Sensory-Based mHealth Interventions to Improve Distress Coping in Healthcare Professionals: A Multi-Arm Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial.

Baumann H, Heuel L, Bischoff L, Wollesen B Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(4).

PMID: 36850920 PMC: 9963645. DOI: 10.3390/s23042322.


Effects of the Population-Based "10,000 Steps Duesseldorf" Intervention for Promoting Physical Activity in Community-Dwelling Adults: Protocol for a Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Matos Fialho P, Gunther L, Schmitz E, Trummler J, Willemsen S, Vomhof M JMIR Res Protoc. 2022; 11(9):e39175.

PMID: 36129746 PMC: 11186676. DOI: 10.2196/39175.

References
1.
Kohatsu N, Robinson J, Torner J . Evidence-based public health: an evolving concept. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27(5):417-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.07.019. View

2.
Fischer F . [Digital interventions in prevention and health promotion: What kind of evidence do we have and what is needed?]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020; 63(6):674-680. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-020-03143-6. View

3.
Bammann K, Drell C, Lubs L, Stalling I . Cluster-randomised trial on participatory community-based outdoor physical activity promotion programs in adults aged 65-75 years in Germany: protocol of the OUTDOOR ACTIVE intervention trial. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):1197. PMC: 6199784. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6124-z. View

4.
Peters D, Adam T, Alonge O, Agyepong I, Tran N . Implementation research: what it is and how to do it. BMJ. 2013; 347:f6753. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f6753. View

5.
Muellmann S, Buck C, Voelcker-Rehage C, Bragina I, Lippke S, Meyer J . Effects of two web-based interventions promoting physical activity among older adults compared to a delayed intervention control group in Northwestern Germany: Results of the PROMOTE community-based intervention trial. Prev Med Rep. 2019; 15:100958. PMC: 6687228. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100958. View