Motivational Interviewing: An Evidence-Based Approach for Use in Medical Practice

Overview

Journal Dtsch Arztebl Int

Specialties General Medicine
Public Health

Date 2021 Apr 9

PMID 33835006

Citations 37

Authors

Gallus Bischof

Anja Bischof

Hans-Jurgen Rumpf

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Motivational factors in health-relevant modes of behavior are an important matter in medical practice. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a technique that has been specifically developed to help motivate ambivalent patients to change their behav - ior.

Methods: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Special attention was paid to systematic reviews and meta-analyses concerning the efficacy of MI in the medical care of various target groups. The present review focuses on the relevance of MI for patients with highly prevalent disorders.

Results: Meta-analyses reveal statistically significant mean intervention effects of MI in medical care with respect to a variety of health-relevant modes of behavior, in comparison to standard treatment and no treatment in the control groups (odds ratio [OR]: 1.55; 95% confidence interval: [1.40; 1.71]). Statistically significant effect sizes were reported for substance consumption, physical activity, dental hygiene, body weight, treatment adherence, willingness to change behavior, and mortality; effects on healthpromoting behavior were mixed. Studies of the factors that contribute to the efficacy of MI suggest that it exerts its effects largely through the selective reinforcement of statements made by the patients themselves about potential changes in their behavior.

Conclusion: MI has been found useful for strengthening the motivation for behavioral change in patients with various behavioral - ly influenced health problems and for promoting treatment adherence. It can be used to optimize medical interventions. Further research is needed with respect to its specific mechanisms of action, its efficacy in reinforcing health-promoting modes of be - havior, differential indications for different patient groups, and the cost-efficiency of the technique across the spectrum of disorders in which it is used.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of motivational interview on psychological distress of women with human papilloma virus: a randomized clinical trial.

Galeshi M, Shirafkan H, Yazdani S, Motaghi Z BMC Womens Health. 2025; 25(1):73.

PMID: 39972290 PMC: 11837719. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-025-03595-5.

Motivational Interviewing (MI) in Obesity Care: Cultivating Person-Centered and Supportive Clinical Conversations to Reduce Stigma: A Narrative Review.

Moize V, Graham Y, Salas X, Balcells M Obes Sci Pract. 2025; 11(1):e70057.

PMID: 39936107 PMC: 11810810. DOI: 10.1002/osp4.70057.

Effectiveness of a hybrid, obesity-specific counselling programme in improving medical students' self-efficacy and motivational interviewing skills for paediatric obesity counselling.

Ng W, Koura R, Khaider K, Chew C, Davis C BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25(1):224.

PMID: 39934793 PMC: 11817560. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06589-3.

Concussion and the Autonomic, Immune, and Endocrine Systems: An Introduction to the Field and a Treatment Framework for Persisting Symptoms.

Pertab J, Merkley T, Winiarski H, Cramond K, Cramond A J Pers Med. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39852225 PMC: 11766534. DOI: 10.3390/jpm15010033.

Investigating assumptions in motivational interviewing among general practitioners: a qualitative study.

Aujoulat P, Manach A, Le Reste C, Le Goff D, Le Reste J, Barais M BMC Prim Care. 2025; 26(1):15.

PMID: 39833675 PMC: 11744887. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-025-02706-3.

References

DiClemente C, Corno C, Graydon M, Wiprovnick A, Knoblach D . Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: A review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017; 31(8):862-887. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000318. View

Lundahl B, Moleni T, Burke B, Butters R, Tollefson D, Butler C . Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 93(2):157-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.012. View

Palacio A, Garay D, Langer B, Taylor J, Wood B, Tamariz L . Motivational Interviewing Improves Medication Adherence: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 31(8):929-40. PMC: 4945560. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3685-3. View

Jungst C, Graber S, Simons S, Wedemeyer H, Lammert F . Medication adherence among patients with chronic diseases: a survey-based study in pharmacies. QJM. 2019; 112(7):505-512. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcz058. View

Romano M, Peters L . Evaluating the mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing in the treatment of mental health problems: A review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015; 38:1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.02.008. View

Zomahoun H, Guenette L, Gregoire J, Lauzier S, Lawani A, Ferdynus C . Effectiveness of motivational interviewing interventions on medication adherence in adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2016; 46(2):589-602. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw273. View

Copeland L, McNamara R, Kelson M, Simpson S . Mechanisms of change within motivational interviewing in relation to health behaviors outcomes: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 98(4):401-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.022. View

. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018; 392(10159):1859-1922. PMC: 6252083. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32335-3. View

Stalnikowicz R, Brezis M . Meaningful shared decision-making: complex process demanding cognitive and emotional skills. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020; 26(2):431-438. DOI: 10.1111/jep.13349. View

10.

Magill M, Hallgren K . Mechanisms of behavior change in motivational interviewing: do we understand how MI works?. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019; 30:1-5. PMC: 6581630. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.010. View

11.

Steindl C, Jonas E, Sittenthaler S, Traut-Mattausch E, Greenberg J . Understanding Psychological Reactance: New Developments and Findings. Z Psychol. 2016; 223(4):205-214. PMC: 4675534. DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000222. View

12.

Ryan R, Deci E . Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will?. J Pers. 2006; 74(6):1557-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x. View

13.

Brown M, Bussell J, Dutta S, Davis K, Strong S, Mathew S . Medication Adherence: Truth and Consequences. Am J Med Sci. 2016; 351(4):387-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.01.010. View

14.

Plass D, Vos T, Hornberg C, Scheidt-Nave C, Zeeb H, Kramer A . Trends in disease burden in Germany: results, implications and limitations of the Global Burden of Disease study. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014; 111(38):629-38. PMC: 4199248. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0629. View

15.

Frost H, Campbell P, Maxwell M, OCarroll R, Dombrowski S, Williams B . Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on adult behaviour change in health and social care settings: A systematic review of reviews. PLoS One. 2018; 13(10):e0204890. PMC: 6193639. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204890. View

16.

VanBuskirk K, Wetherell J . Motivational interviewing with primary care populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Med. 2013; 37(4):768-80. PMC: 4118674. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-013-9527-4. View

17.

Durand H, Hayes P, C Morrissey E, Newell J, Casey M, Murphy A . Medication adherence among patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2017; 35(12):2346-2357. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001502. View