» Articles » PMID: 33833552

Combined Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and CURB-65 Score As an Accurate Predictor of Mortality for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Elderly

Overview
Journal Int J Gen Med
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Apr 9
PMID 33833552
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is common among the elderly; it typically has a poor prognosis and high mortality. This study evaluated the factors predicting CAP-related in-hospital mortality in the elderly to identify a simpler and more accurate predictor.

Patients And Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study. The data used in this study was collected from all older patients (≥65) with CAP admitted to our hospital between January 2012 and April 2020.

Results: A total of 2028 older patients with CAP were included; 121 (5.97%) died in hospital. Of the patients in the study, 1267 (62.5%) were men and 261 (12.9%) had a history of malignant tumors. After performing univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, sex, history of malignant tumor, CURB-65 score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), hemoglobin level, and NLR*CURB-65 levels were associated with CAP mortality. By comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the predicted factors, the NLR*CURB-65 level used to predict CAP mortality in the elderly was 0.755, and was superior to other measurements. All included patients were then dichotomized into two groups based on NLR*CURB-65 level (≤9.06 and >9.06) according to the ROC analysis. Patients with a high NLR*CURB-65 level had higher in-hospital mortality than those with a low NLR*CURB-65 level. The two divided groups showed significant differences in age, sex, smoking history, comorbidity, and laboratory findings. This indicates that NLR*CURB-65 is a predictive index that could reflect the comprehensive condition of older patients with CAP.

Conclusion: NLR*CURB-65 is a simpler and more accurate predictor of CAP-related in-hospital mortality in the elderly.

Citing Articles

Establishment of risk model for elderly CAP at different age stages: a single-center retrospective observational study.

Lv C, Pan T, Shi W, Peng W, Gao Y, Muhith A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):12432.

PMID: 37528213 PMC: 10393957. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39542-3.


Prognostic Factors for Cardiovascular Events in Elderly Patients with Community Acquired Pneumonia: Results from the CAP-China Network.

Han X, Chen L, Li H, Zhou F, Xing X, Zhang C Clin Interv Aging. 2022; 17:603-614.

PMID: 35497052 PMC: 9047947. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S356925.


Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio: An Emerging Marker of the Relationships between the Immune System and Diseases.

Buonacera A, Stancanelli B, Colaci M, Malatino L Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(7).

PMID: 35408994 PMC: 8998851. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23073636.

References
1.
Kartal O, Kartal A . Value of neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratios in pneumonia. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2017; 118(9):513-516. DOI: 10.4149/BLL_2017_099. View

2.
Schuetz P, Koller M, Christ-Crain M, Steyerberg E, Stolz D, Muller C . Predicting mortality with pneumonia severity scores: importance of model recalibration to local settings. Epidemiol Infect. 2008; 136(12):1628-37. PMC: 2870789. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268808000435. View

3.
Mandell L, Wunderink R, Anzueto A, Bartlett J, Campbell G, Dean N . Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44 Suppl 2:S27-72. PMC: 7107997. DOI: 10.1086/511159. View

4.
Lim W, van der Eerden M, Laing R, Boersma W, Karalus N, Town G . Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax. 2003; 58(5):377-82. PMC: 1746657. DOI: 10.1136/thorax.58.5.377. View

5.
Chong C, Street P . Pneumonia in the elderly: a review of severity assessment, prognosis, mortality, prevention, and treatment. South Med J. 2008; 101(11):1134-40. DOI: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31818247f1. View