» Articles » PMID: 33828516

Risky Sexual Behavior of Young Adults in Hong Kong: An Exploratory Study of Psychosocial Risk Factors

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2021 Apr 8
PMID 33828516
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is limited knowledge of the prevalence and nature of risky sexual behavior (RSB) among young adults in Hong Kong. This cross-sectional study explored the psychosocial risk factors of RSB with a sample of 1,171 Hong Kong university students (aged 18-40 years). Grounded in the theoretical propositions of several criminological theories (i.e., the theories of self-control, general strain, social learning, social control, and routine activity), engagement in three types of RSB (i.e., general, penetrative, and non-penetrative) was studied alongside a range of psychosocial risk factors. Relative to female participants, male participants reported significantly higher mean levels of general, penetrative, and non-penetrative RSB. Male participants also reported significantly higher mean levels of negative temperament, use of alcohol and other drugs, and paraphilic interests than female participants, who reported significantly higher mean levels of self-control and social bonds than their male counterparts. The results of multivariate analyses (i.e., OLS regressions) revealed that, to a large extent, the male and female participants shared a similar set of psychosocial risk factors (i.e., use of alcohol and other drugs, and paraphilic interest) for their involvement in general, penetrative, and non-penetrative RSB. Furthermore, a high level of negative temperament was significantly associated with penetrative RSB for both genders, while a high level of perceived neighborhood disorganization was found to be an important factor in the participation of females in general, penetrative, and non-penetrative RSB. The findings of this study may have important implications for practice in regard to reducing, if not entirely preventing, the tendency to engage in RSB.

Citing Articles

Energy and vulnerability: Exploring the energy poverty-risky sexual behavior nexus among young women in Ghana.

Okyere M, Christian A, Essel-Gaisey F, Zuka F SSM Popul Health. 2024; 25:101597.

PMID: 39669773 PMC: 11636782. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101597.


Secondary School Students' Views on Sexuality and Sexual Health Education.

Ng H, Boey K, Kwan C, To H Int J Sex Health. 2024; 36(3):391-405.

PMID: 39148916 PMC: 11323859. DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2341627.


Risky Sexual Behavior and Psychopathy: Testing the Relationship in a Non-Clinical Sample of Young Adults in Hong Kong.

Chan H, Beech A Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38392448 PMC: 10885930. DOI: 10.3390/bs14020094.


Female Affective Perception of Mainstream and Paraphilic Pornography: Associations with Sexual and Psychological Intrapersonal Variables.

Prantner S, Gimenez-Garcia C, Espino-Paya A, Escrig M, Fuentes-Sanchez N, Ballester-Arnal R Arch Sex Behav. 2023; 53(2):715-733.

PMID: 37863863 PMC: 10844147. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-023-02701-8.


Youth sexual offending in Hong Kong: examining the role of self-control, risky sexual behaviors, and paraphilic interests.

Chan H Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1143271.

PMID: 37377476 PMC: 10292797. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1143271.


References
1.
Stuewig J, Tangney J, Kendall S, Folk J, Meyer C, Dearing R . Children's proneness to shame and guilt predict risky and illegal behaviors in young adulthood. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2014; 46(2):217-27. PMC: 4239200. DOI: 10.1007/s10578-014-0467-1. View

2.
Lansford J, Dodge K, Fontaine R, Bates J, Pettit G . Peer rejection, affiliation with deviant peers, delinquency, and risky sexual behavior. J Youth Adolesc. 2014; 43(10):1742-51. PMC: 4163526. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-014-0175-y. View

3.
Kafka M, Hennen J . Hypersexual desire in males: are males with paraphilias different from males with paraphilia-related disorders?. Sex Abuse. 2003; 15(4):307-21. DOI: 10.1177/107906320301500407. View

4.
Dawson S, Bannerman B, Lalumiere M . Paraphilic Interests: An Examination of Sex Differences in a Nonclinical Sample. Sex Abuse. 2014; 28(1):20-45. DOI: 10.1177/1079063214525645. View

5.
t Hart-Kerkhoffs L, Vermeiren R, Jansen L, Doreleijers T . Juvenile group sex offenders: a comparison of group leaders and followers. J Interpers Violence. 2010; 26(1):3-20. DOI: 10.1177/0886260510362882. View